May 01, 2008
The Bush administration proposed today to allow concealed weapons inside national parks, fulfilling a long-sought goal of the influential US gun lobby.
The plan put forward by the interior department, which supervises America's 390 national parks and 548 wildlife refuges, would repeal a decades-old rule banning guns in the park system.
"The safety and protection of park and refuge visitors remains a top priority," interior secretary Dirk Kempthorne said in a statement announcing the rules change.
Conservative politicians have joined the National Rifle Association, the largest gun-rights group in the country, to press for weapons in the parks before a new - and possibly Democratic - president takes office next year. Supporters of the ban argue that park visitors need protection from animals or criminal attacks.
Although threats to rangers in national parks have risen according to some independent research, the sites remain highly safe for visitors. The chance of becoming a crime victim in an official US refuge is 1 in more than 708,000, park service advocacy groups have noted.
Under the new rules, concealed weapons would remain prohibited in California, as well as other states that have passed separate laws against bringing guns into parks.
But that exception is prompting critics, such as Democratic senator Dianne Feinstein, to question what happens when one national park crosses a line between two states with two different laws.
"This sort of inconsistency would be an open invitation to poachers, would be almost impossible to enforce, and would seriously place public safety at risk," Feinstein said.
The park service advocacy groups, representing rangers and frequent visitors to the scenic areas, have condemned the rule as a politically motivated sop to the right wing.
"This proposed regulation increases the risk to visitors, employees and wildlife rather than reducing it," Bill Wade, chairman of the coalition of national parks retirees, said.
(c) 2008 The Guardian
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
The Bush administration proposed today to allow concealed weapons inside national parks, fulfilling a long-sought goal of the influential US gun lobby.
The plan put forward by the interior department, which supervises America's 390 national parks and 548 wildlife refuges, would repeal a decades-old rule banning guns in the park system.
"The safety and protection of park and refuge visitors remains a top priority," interior secretary Dirk Kempthorne said in a statement announcing the rules change.
Conservative politicians have joined the National Rifle Association, the largest gun-rights group in the country, to press for weapons in the parks before a new - and possibly Democratic - president takes office next year. Supporters of the ban argue that park visitors need protection from animals or criminal attacks.
Although threats to rangers in national parks have risen according to some independent research, the sites remain highly safe for visitors. The chance of becoming a crime victim in an official US refuge is 1 in more than 708,000, park service advocacy groups have noted.
Under the new rules, concealed weapons would remain prohibited in California, as well as other states that have passed separate laws against bringing guns into parks.
But that exception is prompting critics, such as Democratic senator Dianne Feinstein, to question what happens when one national park crosses a line between two states with two different laws.
"This sort of inconsistency would be an open invitation to poachers, would be almost impossible to enforce, and would seriously place public safety at risk," Feinstein said.
The park service advocacy groups, representing rangers and frequent visitors to the scenic areas, have condemned the rule as a politically motivated sop to the right wing.
"This proposed regulation increases the risk to visitors, employees and wildlife rather than reducing it," Bill Wade, chairman of the coalition of national parks retirees, said.
(c) 2008 The Guardian
The Bush administration proposed today to allow concealed weapons inside national parks, fulfilling a long-sought goal of the influential US gun lobby.
The plan put forward by the interior department, which supervises America's 390 national parks and 548 wildlife refuges, would repeal a decades-old rule banning guns in the park system.
"The safety and protection of park and refuge visitors remains a top priority," interior secretary Dirk Kempthorne said in a statement announcing the rules change.
Conservative politicians have joined the National Rifle Association, the largest gun-rights group in the country, to press for weapons in the parks before a new - and possibly Democratic - president takes office next year. Supporters of the ban argue that park visitors need protection from animals or criminal attacks.
Although threats to rangers in national parks have risen according to some independent research, the sites remain highly safe for visitors. The chance of becoming a crime victim in an official US refuge is 1 in more than 708,000, park service advocacy groups have noted.
Under the new rules, concealed weapons would remain prohibited in California, as well as other states that have passed separate laws against bringing guns into parks.
But that exception is prompting critics, such as Democratic senator Dianne Feinstein, to question what happens when one national park crosses a line between two states with two different laws.
"This sort of inconsistency would be an open invitation to poachers, would be almost impossible to enforce, and would seriously place public safety at risk," Feinstein said.
The park service advocacy groups, representing rangers and frequent visitors to the scenic areas, have condemned the rule as a politically motivated sop to the right wing.
"This proposed regulation increases the risk to visitors, employees and wildlife rather than reducing it," Bill Wade, chairman of the coalition of national parks retirees, said.
(c) 2008 The Guardian
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.