SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Bush Administration Proposes Allowing Concealed Guns At Parks
May 01, 2008
The Bush administration proposed today to allow concealed weapons inside national parks, fulfilling a long-sought goal of the influential US gun lobby.
The plan put forward by the interior department, which supervises America's 390 national parks and 548 wildlife refuges, would repeal a decades-old rule banning guns in the park system.
"The safety and protection of park and refuge visitors remains a top priority," interior secretary Dirk Kempthorne said in a statement announcing the rules change.
Conservative politicians have joined the National Rifle Association, the largest gun-rights group in the country, to press for weapons in the parks before a new - and possibly Democratic - president takes office next year. Supporters of the ban argue that park visitors need protection from animals or criminal attacks.
Although threats to rangers in national parks have risen according to some independent research, the sites remain highly safe for visitors. The chance of becoming a crime victim in an official US refuge is 1 in more than 708,000, park service advocacy groups have noted.
Under the new rules, concealed weapons would remain prohibited in California, as well as other states that have passed separate laws against bringing guns into parks.
But that exception is prompting critics, such as Democratic senator Dianne Feinstein, to question what happens when one national park crosses a line between two states with two different laws.
"This sort of inconsistency would be an open invitation to poachers, would be almost impossible to enforce, and would seriously place public safety at risk," Feinstein said.
The park service advocacy groups, representing rangers and frequent visitors to the scenic areas, have condemned the rule as a politically motivated sop to the right wing.
"This proposed regulation increases the risk to visitors, employees and wildlife rather than reducing it," Bill Wade, chairman of the coalition of national parks retirees, said.
(c) 2008 The Guardian
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
The Bush administration proposed today to allow concealed weapons inside national parks, fulfilling a long-sought goal of the influential US gun lobby.
The plan put forward by the interior department, which supervises America's 390 national parks and 548 wildlife refuges, would repeal a decades-old rule banning guns in the park system.
"The safety and protection of park and refuge visitors remains a top priority," interior secretary Dirk Kempthorne said in a statement announcing the rules change.
Conservative politicians have joined the National Rifle Association, the largest gun-rights group in the country, to press for weapons in the parks before a new - and possibly Democratic - president takes office next year. Supporters of the ban argue that park visitors need protection from animals or criminal attacks.
Although threats to rangers in national parks have risen according to some independent research, the sites remain highly safe for visitors. The chance of becoming a crime victim in an official US refuge is 1 in more than 708,000, park service advocacy groups have noted.
Under the new rules, concealed weapons would remain prohibited in California, as well as other states that have passed separate laws against bringing guns into parks.
But that exception is prompting critics, such as Democratic senator Dianne Feinstein, to question what happens when one national park crosses a line between two states with two different laws.
"This sort of inconsistency would be an open invitation to poachers, would be almost impossible to enforce, and would seriously place public safety at risk," Feinstein said.
The park service advocacy groups, representing rangers and frequent visitors to the scenic areas, have condemned the rule as a politically motivated sop to the right wing.
"This proposed regulation increases the risk to visitors, employees and wildlife rather than reducing it," Bill Wade, chairman of the coalition of national parks retirees, said.
(c) 2008 The Guardian
The Bush administration proposed today to allow concealed weapons inside national parks, fulfilling a long-sought goal of the influential US gun lobby.
The plan put forward by the interior department, which supervises America's 390 national parks and 548 wildlife refuges, would repeal a decades-old rule banning guns in the park system.
"The safety and protection of park and refuge visitors remains a top priority," interior secretary Dirk Kempthorne said in a statement announcing the rules change.
Conservative politicians have joined the National Rifle Association, the largest gun-rights group in the country, to press for weapons in the parks before a new - and possibly Democratic - president takes office next year. Supporters of the ban argue that park visitors need protection from animals or criminal attacks.
Although threats to rangers in national parks have risen according to some independent research, the sites remain highly safe for visitors. The chance of becoming a crime victim in an official US refuge is 1 in more than 708,000, park service advocacy groups have noted.
Under the new rules, concealed weapons would remain prohibited in California, as well as other states that have passed separate laws against bringing guns into parks.
But that exception is prompting critics, such as Democratic senator Dianne Feinstein, to question what happens when one national park crosses a line between two states with two different laws.
"This sort of inconsistency would be an open invitation to poachers, would be almost impossible to enforce, and would seriously place public safety at risk," Feinstein said.
The park service advocacy groups, representing rangers and frequent visitors to the scenic areas, have condemned the rule as a politically motivated sop to the right wing.
"This proposed regulation increases the risk to visitors, employees and wildlife rather than reducing it," Bill Wade, chairman of the coalition of national parks retirees, said.
(c) 2008 The Guardian
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.