

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Russell Mokhiber: Two questions.
On Adelphia, individuals were charged criminally, but the company was only charged in a civil fraud case by the SEC. Why wasn't the company charged with a criminal charge, as the individuals were?
Ari Fleischer: Any decisions made about prosecutions I would refer you to the [Justice Department] -- they are not White House matters.
Mokhiber: Okay, but although I do remember last week that you made a big announcement here on those matters.
Fleischer: That's correct. I noted the arrests, but I referred people to the Justice Department for details about those specific charges.
Mokhiber: Second question on the bankruptcy [bill], most of the consumer groups are opposed to it. They say that it creates a double standard, that corporations that get into trouble because of crimes, like WorldCom, run to court declare bankruptcy without any trouble. This law would create hurdles for individuals to do the same. Why is the President going to sign this law that creates this double standard?
Fleischer: This has been an issue that the Congress has debated and heard many of those same questions themselves and they arrived at what Congress thought, and the President agrees, is a helpful compromise that protects the rights of individuals, that is consumer related, but at the same time it makes certain that people who go bankrupt can't walk away without any of their debts. This is a classic balancing question of how to make certain that people who go bankrupt pay for their debts and to do so in a way that doesn't give people an incentive to have their debts forgiven. The law is creating more incentives for people to go bankrupt.
Mokhiber: But corporations are going bankrupt without -- and there are no hurdles for them created by this law.
Fleischer: I think the laws also covers corporations and their obligations to repay their debt -- that's part of the law that's on the books today too.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Russell Mokhiber: Two questions.
On Adelphia, individuals were charged criminally, but the company was only charged in a civil fraud case by the SEC. Why wasn't the company charged with a criminal charge, as the individuals were?
Ari Fleischer: Any decisions made about prosecutions I would refer you to the [Justice Department] -- they are not White House matters.
Mokhiber: Okay, but although I do remember last week that you made a big announcement here on those matters.
Fleischer: That's correct. I noted the arrests, but I referred people to the Justice Department for details about those specific charges.
Mokhiber: Second question on the bankruptcy [bill], most of the consumer groups are opposed to it. They say that it creates a double standard, that corporations that get into trouble because of crimes, like WorldCom, run to court declare bankruptcy without any trouble. This law would create hurdles for individuals to do the same. Why is the President going to sign this law that creates this double standard?
Fleischer: This has been an issue that the Congress has debated and heard many of those same questions themselves and they arrived at what Congress thought, and the President agrees, is a helpful compromise that protects the rights of individuals, that is consumer related, but at the same time it makes certain that people who go bankrupt can't walk away without any of their debts. This is a classic balancing question of how to make certain that people who go bankrupt pay for their debts and to do so in a way that doesn't give people an incentive to have their debts forgiven. The law is creating more incentives for people to go bankrupt.
Mokhiber: But corporations are going bankrupt without -- and there are no hurdles for them created by this law.
Fleischer: I think the laws also covers corporations and their obligations to repay their debt -- that's part of the law that's on the books today too.
Russell Mokhiber: Two questions.
On Adelphia, individuals were charged criminally, but the company was only charged in a civil fraud case by the SEC. Why wasn't the company charged with a criminal charge, as the individuals were?
Ari Fleischer: Any decisions made about prosecutions I would refer you to the [Justice Department] -- they are not White House matters.
Mokhiber: Okay, but although I do remember last week that you made a big announcement here on those matters.
Fleischer: That's correct. I noted the arrests, but I referred people to the Justice Department for details about those specific charges.
Mokhiber: Second question on the bankruptcy [bill], most of the consumer groups are opposed to it. They say that it creates a double standard, that corporations that get into trouble because of crimes, like WorldCom, run to court declare bankruptcy without any trouble. This law would create hurdles for individuals to do the same. Why is the President going to sign this law that creates this double standard?
Fleischer: This has been an issue that the Congress has debated and heard many of those same questions themselves and they arrived at what Congress thought, and the President agrees, is a helpful compromise that protects the rights of individuals, that is consumer related, but at the same time it makes certain that people who go bankrupt can't walk away without any of their debts. This is a classic balancing question of how to make certain that people who go bankrupt pay for their debts and to do so in a way that doesn't give people an incentive to have their debts forgiven. The law is creating more incentives for people to go bankrupt.
Mokhiber: But corporations are going bankrupt without -- and there are no hurdles for them created by this law.
Fleischer: I think the laws also covers corporations and their obligations to repay their debt -- that's part of the law that's on the books today too.