

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Mokhiber: Ari, there's a report today that the President's decision on carbon dioxide emissions was routed through the legislative affairs director, Nicholas Calio. Calio in 1997 -- his firm -- was paid $420,000 to lobby on this issue by Tenneco Automotive, which is the largest auto exhaust systems company in the country.
I'm wondering if the President is concerned about a perception of corporate lobbyists coming into the White House and making decisions on things they were paid for just a couple of years ago.
Fleischer: Who is the author of this report?
Mokhiber: Center for Public Integrity -- Chuck Lewis' group here.
Fleischer: That decision was made by the President, that decision was made by the policy staff. Calio is our liaison to the Congress. He then conveys to the Congress the decisions that have been made -- or that was the case here.
Mokhiber: Is he concerned about this perception -- this growing perception -- that corporate lobbyists that work on exactly the same issues as paid lobbyists, come in and make the public policy decisions?
Fleischer: The President makes his decisions on the merits, makes his decisions on what he believes is in the national interest.
For example, there are many people who are seeking business tax credits, business tax breaks in the tax bill. The President, others of course on staff, made it very clear to everybody in town that was not going to be the case this year.
If you recall, Larry Linsey had a meeting with K Street lobbyists, who expected to have business provisions added to the tax bill. That would not be the case. As the President put it -- this tax bill should take care of people first, not business.
So, there are going to be issues in which the President takes actions that he believes are in the national interest. Sometimes that will include business, and other times it will not.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Mokhiber: Ari, there's a report today that the President's decision on carbon dioxide emissions was routed through the legislative affairs director, Nicholas Calio. Calio in 1997 -- his firm -- was paid $420,000 to lobby on this issue by Tenneco Automotive, which is the largest auto exhaust systems company in the country.
I'm wondering if the President is concerned about a perception of corporate lobbyists coming into the White House and making decisions on things they were paid for just a couple of years ago.
Fleischer: Who is the author of this report?
Mokhiber: Center for Public Integrity -- Chuck Lewis' group here.
Fleischer: That decision was made by the President, that decision was made by the policy staff. Calio is our liaison to the Congress. He then conveys to the Congress the decisions that have been made -- or that was the case here.
Mokhiber: Is he concerned about this perception -- this growing perception -- that corporate lobbyists that work on exactly the same issues as paid lobbyists, come in and make the public policy decisions?
Fleischer: The President makes his decisions on the merits, makes his decisions on what he believes is in the national interest.
For example, there are many people who are seeking business tax credits, business tax breaks in the tax bill. The President, others of course on staff, made it very clear to everybody in town that was not going to be the case this year.
If you recall, Larry Linsey had a meeting with K Street lobbyists, who expected to have business provisions added to the tax bill. That would not be the case. As the President put it -- this tax bill should take care of people first, not business.
So, there are going to be issues in which the President takes actions that he believes are in the national interest. Sometimes that will include business, and other times it will not.
Mokhiber: Ari, there's a report today that the President's decision on carbon dioxide emissions was routed through the legislative affairs director, Nicholas Calio. Calio in 1997 -- his firm -- was paid $420,000 to lobby on this issue by Tenneco Automotive, which is the largest auto exhaust systems company in the country.
I'm wondering if the President is concerned about a perception of corporate lobbyists coming into the White House and making decisions on things they were paid for just a couple of years ago.
Fleischer: Who is the author of this report?
Mokhiber: Center for Public Integrity -- Chuck Lewis' group here.
Fleischer: That decision was made by the President, that decision was made by the policy staff. Calio is our liaison to the Congress. He then conveys to the Congress the decisions that have been made -- or that was the case here.
Mokhiber: Is he concerned about this perception -- this growing perception -- that corporate lobbyists that work on exactly the same issues as paid lobbyists, come in and make the public policy decisions?
Fleischer: The President makes his decisions on the merits, makes his decisions on what he believes is in the national interest.
For example, there are many people who are seeking business tax credits, business tax breaks in the tax bill. The President, others of course on staff, made it very clear to everybody in town that was not going to be the case this year.
If you recall, Larry Linsey had a meeting with K Street lobbyists, who expected to have business provisions added to the tax bill. That would not be the case. As the President put it -- this tax bill should take care of people first, not business.
So, there are going to be issues in which the President takes actions that he believes are in the national interest. Sometimes that will include business, and other times it will not.