Jan 10, 2014
According to Evan Perez writing for CNN, at a recent meeting in Washington, federal prosecutors asked the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency--the chief body responsible for regulating JPMorgan and other big banks--what would happen if criminal charges were filed against JPMorgan.
The prosecutors were told by regulators that U.S. law requires that they pull the licenses of banks convicted of criminal charges. As a result, the prosecutors reportedly felt pressured not to press criminal charges, for fear of doing damage to the economy.
"Prosecutors complain that when they push for tougher penalties, regulators warn of consequences that could mean damage to the U.S. economy," Perez writes.
Perez's claims appear to be confirmed by the statements of U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara, following JPMorgan's settlement Tuesday for its complicity in Bernard Madoff's Ponzi scheme. When asked by reporters why the the bank and its leaders did not face stiffer consequences, Bharara replied,
You have to consider consequences such as employees being laid off, the bank failing... You have to consider consequences such as innocent shareholders losing substantial value. You have to consider the possibility that regulators will take action against the charter of the financial institution.
According to Perez, "The result is that highly profitable banks pay large settlements and move on."
_____________________
Join the Movement: Become Part of the Solution Today
We're optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place.
We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter counts.
Your contribution supports this new media model—free, independent, and dedicated to uncovering the truth. Stand with us in the fight for social justice, human rights, and equality. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today!
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
According to Evan Perez writing for CNN, at a recent meeting in Washington, federal prosecutors asked the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency--the chief body responsible for regulating JPMorgan and other big banks--what would happen if criminal charges were filed against JPMorgan.
The prosecutors were told by regulators that U.S. law requires that they pull the licenses of banks convicted of criminal charges. As a result, the prosecutors reportedly felt pressured not to press criminal charges, for fear of doing damage to the economy.
"Prosecutors complain that when they push for tougher penalties, regulators warn of consequences that could mean damage to the U.S. economy," Perez writes.
Perez's claims appear to be confirmed by the statements of U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara, following JPMorgan's settlement Tuesday for its complicity in Bernard Madoff's Ponzi scheme. When asked by reporters why the the bank and its leaders did not face stiffer consequences, Bharara replied,
You have to consider consequences such as employees being laid off, the bank failing... You have to consider consequences such as innocent shareholders losing substantial value. You have to consider the possibility that regulators will take action against the charter of the financial institution.
According to Perez, "The result is that highly profitable banks pay large settlements and move on."
_____________________
According to Evan Perez writing for CNN, at a recent meeting in Washington, federal prosecutors asked the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency--the chief body responsible for regulating JPMorgan and other big banks--what would happen if criminal charges were filed against JPMorgan.
The prosecutors were told by regulators that U.S. law requires that they pull the licenses of banks convicted of criminal charges. As a result, the prosecutors reportedly felt pressured not to press criminal charges, for fear of doing damage to the economy.
"Prosecutors complain that when they push for tougher penalties, regulators warn of consequences that could mean damage to the U.S. economy," Perez writes.
Perez's claims appear to be confirmed by the statements of U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara, following JPMorgan's settlement Tuesday for its complicity in Bernard Madoff's Ponzi scheme. When asked by reporters why the the bank and its leaders did not face stiffer consequences, Bharara replied,
You have to consider consequences such as employees being laid off, the bank failing... You have to consider consequences such as innocent shareholders losing substantial value. You have to consider the possibility that regulators will take action against the charter of the financial institution.
According to Perez, "The result is that highly profitable banks pay large settlements and move on."
_____________________
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.