SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
"We, the undersigned, believe that a healthy food system is necessary to meet the urgent challenges of our time," begins the final draft of the Declaration for Healthy Food and Agriculture. Initiated by Roots of Change and half a year in the drafting, it will be released August 29 at Slow Food Nation (SFN) at San Francisco's City Hall.
Organizers of the Labor Day weekend celebration to follow expect to draw over 50,000 people to a variety of events, including a victory garden, food tastings, a Food for Thought speakers' series, a marketplace, and chef demonstrations. It could be the largest food event in American history.
Some of the leading voices in "the good food movement" have drafted the petition. It seeks to change the food policy of the United States and is described as a "national call for a new, sustainable food system." It intends to provide "a clear and commonly held framework for future action to educate citizens and policy makers."
The president of Roots of Change (ROC), a San Francisco-based group, and former chairman of Slow Food USA, Michael Dimock, initiated the concept of such a petition. "This declaration is a call to action by and for all Americans," he said. (www.rocfund.org) "The purpose of U.S. food and agriculture must change and it can no longer focus on the production of cheap calories. Conditions demand a more holistic approach to human and community health that begins on our farms and ranches," he added.
Among the drafting team and original framers were the following: UC Berkeley professor Michael Pollan, Dan Imhoff, author of "Food Fight," and Chez Panisse Restaurant founder Alice Waters. Additional contributors to the final draft to be presented at SFN included Kentucky author and farmer Wendell Berry, environmentalist Bll McKibbon, and Native American leader Winona LaDuke.
Former Deputy Secretary of the U.S. Department of Agriculture Richard Rominger, a farmer, helped draft the petition and said, "This Declaration, which is being crafted by a broad coalition, is the preamble for the next generation of farm policy, and we hope it will stimulate the discussion to help get us there."
"Behind us stands a half-century of industrial food production, underwritten by cheap fossil fuels, abundant land and water resources, and a drive to maximize the global harvest of cheap calories," the Declaration's first paragraph asserts. "Ahead lie rising energy and food costs, a changing climate, declining water supplies, a growing population, and the paradox of widespread hunger and obesity," it continues.
Such claims were documented at the weeklong Stockholm International Water Conference attended by 2,400 water experts and government officials. "A spectre is haunting the cities and villages of most developing nations, warns a senior official of a World Bank-affiliated organization," begins an Aug. 22 Inter Press Service (IPS) article by Thalif Deen.
"'It's the spectre of a food, fuel and water crisis,' says Lars Thunell," the IPS article continues. He is the executive vice president of the Washington-based International Finance Corporation. Agriculture is the most water-intensive sector. The decline in fresh water threatens the food supply. Thunell described recent riots over food prices, growing hunger, and rising malnutrition. Current estimates are that the world will not have enough water to feed itself within 40 years.
"Keeping water under local, public and democratic control is the most just way to insure the greatest degree of water access for the greatest number of people," according to Patti Lynn of Corporate Accountability International, the IPS article concludes.
This is the context within which the Food Declaration will be unveiled in San Francisco and posted at www.fooddeclaration.org. Endorsements and comments will be solicited. The public will be given 90 days to comment before the drafting team creates the final document. The goal is to get at least 300,000 signatures to present it in Washington, D.C. to Congress in the Fall of 2009.
"The movement to create better food and agriculture in the U.S. has been slowly and steadily gaining ground for well over a decade," according to a recent Roots of Change (ROC) statement. "The public's increasing interest and the media's deepening coverage of climate change, energy, agriculture, labor issues, food costs, food quality and obesity may finally illuminate the interrelationship of these crises and provide a context for urgently needed changes," ROC continues.
The intention is to influence the next national farm bill. "The last farm bill cycle," ROC maintains, "confirmed that a tight cadre of lobbyists control the debate to protect the status quo rather than aid the population of the nation." The current farm policy "is mired in a 20th Century industrial paradigm" that benefits "entrenched interests," ROC asserts.
The Declaration calls "for a radically different approach to food and agriculture. We believe that the food system must be reorganized on a foundation of health."
A healthy food and agriculture policy, according to the Declaration, would follow twelve foundational principles. Among them are the following:
* Provides access to affordable, nutritious food for everyone;
* Prevents the exploitation of farmers, workers and natural resources and the cruel treatment of animals;
* Informs customers of how food is produced, where it comes from, and what it contains;
* Protects the finite resources of productive soils, fresh water, and biological diversity;
* Strives to remove fossil fuel from every link in the food chain and replace it with renewable resources and energy;
* Originates from a biological rather than an industrial framework;
* Requires a national dialog concerning technologies used in production.
The final principle affirms "the development of just and sustainable regional farm and food networks."
"Most all the major organizations seeking reform in agriculture in the U.S. have signed on to the Declaration. The challenge remains to bring in more of the current mainstream," ROC president Dimock explained in a phone interview from his home in Santa Rosa, Northern California. "Slow Food Nation is part of a mosaic that can help change food policy in the U.S.," according to Dimock.
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
"We, the undersigned, believe that a healthy food system is necessary to meet the urgent challenges of our time," begins the final draft of the Declaration for Healthy Food and Agriculture. Initiated by Roots of Change and half a year in the drafting, it will be released August 29 at Slow Food Nation (SFN) at San Francisco's City Hall.
Organizers of the Labor Day weekend celebration to follow expect to draw over 50,000 people to a variety of events, including a victory garden, food tastings, a Food for Thought speakers' series, a marketplace, and chef demonstrations. It could be the largest food event in American history.
Some of the leading voices in "the good food movement" have drafted the petition. It seeks to change the food policy of the United States and is described as a "national call for a new, sustainable food system." It intends to provide "a clear and commonly held framework for future action to educate citizens and policy makers."
The president of Roots of Change (ROC), a San Francisco-based group, and former chairman of Slow Food USA, Michael Dimock, initiated the concept of such a petition. "This declaration is a call to action by and for all Americans," he said. (www.rocfund.org) "The purpose of U.S. food and agriculture must change and it can no longer focus on the production of cheap calories. Conditions demand a more holistic approach to human and community health that begins on our farms and ranches," he added.
Among the drafting team and original framers were the following: UC Berkeley professor Michael Pollan, Dan Imhoff, author of "Food Fight," and Chez Panisse Restaurant founder Alice Waters. Additional contributors to the final draft to be presented at SFN included Kentucky author and farmer Wendell Berry, environmentalist Bll McKibbon, and Native American leader Winona LaDuke.
Former Deputy Secretary of the U.S. Department of Agriculture Richard Rominger, a farmer, helped draft the petition and said, "This Declaration, which is being crafted by a broad coalition, is the preamble for the next generation of farm policy, and we hope it will stimulate the discussion to help get us there."
"Behind us stands a half-century of industrial food production, underwritten by cheap fossil fuels, abundant land and water resources, and a drive to maximize the global harvest of cheap calories," the Declaration's first paragraph asserts. "Ahead lie rising energy and food costs, a changing climate, declining water supplies, a growing population, and the paradox of widespread hunger and obesity," it continues.
Such claims were documented at the weeklong Stockholm International Water Conference attended by 2,400 water experts and government officials. "A spectre is haunting the cities and villages of most developing nations, warns a senior official of a World Bank-affiliated organization," begins an Aug. 22 Inter Press Service (IPS) article by Thalif Deen.
"'It's the spectre of a food, fuel and water crisis,' says Lars Thunell," the IPS article continues. He is the executive vice president of the Washington-based International Finance Corporation. Agriculture is the most water-intensive sector. The decline in fresh water threatens the food supply. Thunell described recent riots over food prices, growing hunger, and rising malnutrition. Current estimates are that the world will not have enough water to feed itself within 40 years.
"Keeping water under local, public and democratic control is the most just way to insure the greatest degree of water access for the greatest number of people," according to Patti Lynn of Corporate Accountability International, the IPS article concludes.
This is the context within which the Food Declaration will be unveiled in San Francisco and posted at www.fooddeclaration.org. Endorsements and comments will be solicited. The public will be given 90 days to comment before the drafting team creates the final document. The goal is to get at least 300,000 signatures to present it in Washington, D.C. to Congress in the Fall of 2009.
"The movement to create better food and agriculture in the U.S. has been slowly and steadily gaining ground for well over a decade," according to a recent Roots of Change (ROC) statement. "The public's increasing interest and the media's deepening coverage of climate change, energy, agriculture, labor issues, food costs, food quality and obesity may finally illuminate the interrelationship of these crises and provide a context for urgently needed changes," ROC continues.
The intention is to influence the next national farm bill. "The last farm bill cycle," ROC maintains, "confirmed that a tight cadre of lobbyists control the debate to protect the status quo rather than aid the population of the nation." The current farm policy "is mired in a 20th Century industrial paradigm" that benefits "entrenched interests," ROC asserts.
The Declaration calls "for a radically different approach to food and agriculture. We believe that the food system must be reorganized on a foundation of health."
A healthy food and agriculture policy, according to the Declaration, would follow twelve foundational principles. Among them are the following:
* Provides access to affordable, nutritious food for everyone;
* Prevents the exploitation of farmers, workers and natural resources and the cruel treatment of animals;
* Informs customers of how food is produced, where it comes from, and what it contains;
* Protects the finite resources of productive soils, fresh water, and biological diversity;
* Strives to remove fossil fuel from every link in the food chain and replace it with renewable resources and energy;
* Originates from a biological rather than an industrial framework;
* Requires a national dialog concerning technologies used in production.
The final principle affirms "the development of just and sustainable regional farm and food networks."
"Most all the major organizations seeking reform in agriculture in the U.S. have signed on to the Declaration. The challenge remains to bring in more of the current mainstream," ROC president Dimock explained in a phone interview from his home in Santa Rosa, Northern California. "Slow Food Nation is part of a mosaic that can help change food policy in the U.S.," according to Dimock.
"We, the undersigned, believe that a healthy food system is necessary to meet the urgent challenges of our time," begins the final draft of the Declaration for Healthy Food and Agriculture. Initiated by Roots of Change and half a year in the drafting, it will be released August 29 at Slow Food Nation (SFN) at San Francisco's City Hall.
Organizers of the Labor Day weekend celebration to follow expect to draw over 50,000 people to a variety of events, including a victory garden, food tastings, a Food for Thought speakers' series, a marketplace, and chef demonstrations. It could be the largest food event in American history.
Some of the leading voices in "the good food movement" have drafted the petition. It seeks to change the food policy of the United States and is described as a "national call for a new, sustainable food system." It intends to provide "a clear and commonly held framework for future action to educate citizens and policy makers."
The president of Roots of Change (ROC), a San Francisco-based group, and former chairman of Slow Food USA, Michael Dimock, initiated the concept of such a petition. "This declaration is a call to action by and for all Americans," he said. (www.rocfund.org) "The purpose of U.S. food and agriculture must change and it can no longer focus on the production of cheap calories. Conditions demand a more holistic approach to human and community health that begins on our farms and ranches," he added.
Among the drafting team and original framers were the following: UC Berkeley professor Michael Pollan, Dan Imhoff, author of "Food Fight," and Chez Panisse Restaurant founder Alice Waters. Additional contributors to the final draft to be presented at SFN included Kentucky author and farmer Wendell Berry, environmentalist Bll McKibbon, and Native American leader Winona LaDuke.
Former Deputy Secretary of the U.S. Department of Agriculture Richard Rominger, a farmer, helped draft the petition and said, "This Declaration, which is being crafted by a broad coalition, is the preamble for the next generation of farm policy, and we hope it will stimulate the discussion to help get us there."
"Behind us stands a half-century of industrial food production, underwritten by cheap fossil fuels, abundant land and water resources, and a drive to maximize the global harvest of cheap calories," the Declaration's first paragraph asserts. "Ahead lie rising energy and food costs, a changing climate, declining water supplies, a growing population, and the paradox of widespread hunger and obesity," it continues.
Such claims were documented at the weeklong Stockholm International Water Conference attended by 2,400 water experts and government officials. "A spectre is haunting the cities and villages of most developing nations, warns a senior official of a World Bank-affiliated organization," begins an Aug. 22 Inter Press Service (IPS) article by Thalif Deen.
"'It's the spectre of a food, fuel and water crisis,' says Lars Thunell," the IPS article continues. He is the executive vice president of the Washington-based International Finance Corporation. Agriculture is the most water-intensive sector. The decline in fresh water threatens the food supply. Thunell described recent riots over food prices, growing hunger, and rising malnutrition. Current estimates are that the world will not have enough water to feed itself within 40 years.
"Keeping water under local, public and democratic control is the most just way to insure the greatest degree of water access for the greatest number of people," according to Patti Lynn of Corporate Accountability International, the IPS article concludes.
This is the context within which the Food Declaration will be unveiled in San Francisco and posted at www.fooddeclaration.org. Endorsements and comments will be solicited. The public will be given 90 days to comment before the drafting team creates the final document. The goal is to get at least 300,000 signatures to present it in Washington, D.C. to Congress in the Fall of 2009.
"The movement to create better food and agriculture in the U.S. has been slowly and steadily gaining ground for well over a decade," according to a recent Roots of Change (ROC) statement. "The public's increasing interest and the media's deepening coverage of climate change, energy, agriculture, labor issues, food costs, food quality and obesity may finally illuminate the interrelationship of these crises and provide a context for urgently needed changes," ROC continues.
The intention is to influence the next national farm bill. "The last farm bill cycle," ROC maintains, "confirmed that a tight cadre of lobbyists control the debate to protect the status quo rather than aid the population of the nation." The current farm policy "is mired in a 20th Century industrial paradigm" that benefits "entrenched interests," ROC asserts.
The Declaration calls "for a radically different approach to food and agriculture. We believe that the food system must be reorganized on a foundation of health."
A healthy food and agriculture policy, according to the Declaration, would follow twelve foundational principles. Among them are the following:
* Provides access to affordable, nutritious food for everyone;
* Prevents the exploitation of farmers, workers and natural resources and the cruel treatment of animals;
* Informs customers of how food is produced, where it comes from, and what it contains;
* Protects the finite resources of productive soils, fresh water, and biological diversity;
* Strives to remove fossil fuel from every link in the food chain and replace it with renewable resources and energy;
* Originates from a biological rather than an industrial framework;
* Requires a national dialog concerning technologies used in production.
The final principle affirms "the development of just and sustainable regional farm and food networks."
"Most all the major organizations seeking reform in agriculture in the U.S. have signed on to the Declaration. The challenge remains to bring in more of the current mainstream," ROC president Dimock explained in a phone interview from his home in Santa Rosa, Northern California. "Slow Food Nation is part of a mosaic that can help change food policy in the U.S.," according to Dimock.
"We've got the FBI patrolling the streets." said one protester. "We've got National Guard set up as a show of force. What's scarier is if we allow this."
Residents of Washington, DC over the weekend demonstrated against US President Donald Trump's deployment of the National Guard in their city.
As reported by NBC Washington, demonstrators gathered on Saturday at DuPont Circle and then marched to the White House to direct their anger at Trump for sending the National Guard to Washington DC, and for his efforts to take over the Metropolitan Police Department.
In an interview with NBC Washington, one protester said that it was important for the administration to see that residents weren't intimidated by the presence of military personnel roaming their streets.
"I know a lot of people are scared," the protester said. "We've got the FBI patrolling the streets. We've got National Guard set up as a show of force. What's scarier is if we allow this."
Saturday protests against the presence of the National Guard are expected to be a weekly occurrence, organizers told NBC Washington.
Hours after the march to the White House, other demonstrators began to gather at Union Station to protest the presence of the National Guard units there. Audio obtained by freelance journalist Andrew Leyden reveals that the National Guard decided to move their forces out of the area in reaction to what dispatchers called "growing demonstrations."
Even residents who didn't take part in formal demonstrations over the weekend managed to express their displeasure with the National Guard patrolling the city. According to The Washington Post, locals who spent a night on the town in the U Street neighborhood on Friday night made their unhappiness with law enforcement in the city very well known.
"At the sight of local and federal law enforcement throughout the night, people pooled on the sidewalk—watching, filming, booing," wrote the Post. "Such interactions played out again and again as the night drew on. Onlookers heckled the police as they did their job and applauded as officers left."
Trump last week ordered the National Guard into Washington, DC and tried to take control the Metropolitan Police, purportedly in order to reduce crime in the city. Statistics released earlier this year, however, showed a significant drop in crime in the nation's capital.
"Why not impose more sanctions on [Russia] and force them to agree to a cease-fire, instead of accepting that Putin won't agree to one?" asked NBC's Kristen Welker.
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Sunday was repeatedly put on the spot over the failure of US President Donald Trump to secure a cease-fire deal between Russia and Ukraine.
Rubio appeared on news programs across all major networks on Sunday morning and he was asked on all of them about Trump's summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin ending without any kind of agreement to end the conflict with Ukraine, which has now lasted for more than three years.
During an interview on ABC's "This Week," Rubio was grilled by Martha Raddatz about the purported "progress" being made toward bringing the war to a close. She also zeroed in on Trump's own statements saying that he wanted to see Russia agree to a cease-fire by the end of last week's summit.
"The president went in to that meeting saying he wanted a ceasefire, and there would be consequences if they didn't agree on a ceasefire in that meeting, and they didn't agree to a ceasefire," she said. "So where are the consequences?"
"That's not the aim of this," Rubio replied. "First of all..."
"The president said that was the aim!" Raddatz interjected.
"Yeah, but you're not going to reach a cease-fire or a peace agreement in a meeting in which only one side is represented," Rubio replied. "That's why it's important to bring both leaders together, that's the goal here."
RADDATZ: The president went in to that meeting saying he wanted a ceasefire and there would be consequences if they didn't agree on a ceasefire in that meeting, and they didn't agree to a ceasefire. So where are the consequences?
RUBIO: That's not the aim
RADDATZ: The president… pic.twitter.com/fuO9q1Y5ze
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) August 17, 2025
Rubio also made an appearance on CBS' "Face the Nation," where host Margaret Brennan similarly pressed him about the expectations Trump had set going into the summit.
"The president told those European leaders last week he wanted a ceasefire," she pointed out. "He went on television and said he would walk out of the meeting if Putin didn't agree to one, he said there would be severe consequences if he didn't agree to one. He said he'd walk out in two minutes—he spent three hours talking to Vladimir Putin and he did not get one. So there's mixed messages here."
"Our goal is not to stage some production for the world to say, 'Oh, how dramatic, he walked out,'" Rubio shot back. "Our goal is to have a peace agreement to end this war, OK? And obviously we felt, and I agreed, that there was enough progress, not a lot of progress, but enough progress made in those talks to allow us to move to the next phase."
Rubio then insisted that now was not the time to hit Russia with new sanctions, despite Trump's recent threats to do so, because it would end talks all together.
Brennan: The president told those European leaders last week he wanted a ceasefire. He went on television and said he would walk out of the meeting if Putin didn't agree to one, he said there would be severe consequences if he didn’t agree to one. He spent three hours talking to… pic.twitter.com/2WtuDH5Oii
— Acyn (@Acyn) August 17, 2025
During an appearance on NBC's "Meet the Press," host Kristen Welker asked Rubio about the "severe consequences" Trump had promised for Russia if it did not agree to a cease-fire.
"Why not impose more sanctions on [Russia] and force them to agree to a cease-fire, instead of accepting that Putin won't agree to one?" Welker asked.
"Well, first, that's something that I think a lot of people go around saying that I don't necessarily think is true," he replied. "I don't think new sanctions on Russia are going to force them to accept a cease-fire. They are already under severe sanctions... you can argue that could be a consequence of refusing to agree to a cease-fire or the end of hostilities."
He went on to say that he hoped the US would not be forced to put more sanctions on Russia "because that means peace talks failed."
WELKER: Why not impose more sanctions on Russia and force them to agree to a ceasefire, instead of accepting that Putin won't agree to one?
RUBIO: Well, I think that's something people go around saying that I don't necessarily think is true. I don't think new sanctions on Russia… pic.twitter.com/GoIucsrDmA
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) August 17, 2025
During the 2024 presidential campaign, Trump said that he could end the war between Russian and Ukraine within the span of a single day. In the seven months since his inauguration, the war has only gotten more intense as Russia has stepped up its daily attacks on Ukrainian cities and infrastructure.
"I had to protect my life and my family... my truck was shot three times," said the vehicle's driver.
A family in San Bernardino, California is in shock after masked federal agents opened fire on their truck.
As NBC Los Angeles reported, Customs and Border Protection (CPB) agents on Saturday morning surrounded the family's truck and demanded that its passengers exit the vehicle.
A video of the incident filmed from inside the truck showed the passengers asked the agents to provide identification, which they declined to do.
An agent was then heard demanding that the father, who had been driving the truck, get out of the vehicle. Seconds later, the agent started smashing the car's windows in an attempt to get inside the vehicle.
The father then hit the gas to try to escape, after which several shots could be heard as agents opened fire. Local news station KTLA reported that, after the father successfully fled the scene, he called local police and asked for help because "masked men" had opened fire on his truck.
Looks like, for the first time I'm aware of, masked agents opened fire today, in San Bernardino. Sources posted below: pic.twitter.com/eE1GMglECg
— Eric Levai (@ericlevai) August 17, 2025
A spokesperson for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) defended the agents' actions in a statement to NBC Los Angeles.
"In the course of the incident the suspect drove his car at the officers and struck two CBP officers with his vehicle," they said. "Because of the subjects forcing a CBP officer to discharge his firearm in self-defense."
But the father, who only wished to be identified as "Francisco," pointed out that the agents refused to identify themselves and presented no warrants to justify the search of his truck.
"I had to protect my life and my family," he explained to NBC Los Angeles. "My truck was shot three times."
His son-in-law, who only wished to be identified as "Martin," was similarly critical of the agents' actions.
"Its just upsetting that it happened to us," he said. "I am glad my brother is okay, Pop is okay, but it's just not cool that [immigration enforcement officials are] able to do something like that."
According to KTLA, federal agents surrounded the family's house later that afternoon and demanded that the father come out so that he could be arrested. He refused, and agents eventually departed from the neighborhood without detaining him.
Local advocacy group Inland Coalition for Immigrant Justice said on its Instagram page that it was "mobilizing to provide legal support" for the family.