March, 10 2014, 12:00am EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Reprieve's London office can be contacted on: communications [at] reprieve.org.uk / +44 (0) 207 553 8140.,Reprieve US,, based in New York City, can be contacted on Katherine [dot] oshea [at] reprieve.org
UN Demands Answers Over Civilian Drones Casualties
The UN expert overseeing the use of armed drones has demanded greater accountability and transparency by those states using them - including public investigations into allegations of civilian casualties.
Ben Emmerson, UN Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms while countering terrorism, investigated 37 recent drone strikes in countries. In Yemen he noted a sharp rise in strikes and a "significant number" of civilian casualties since the end of 2013.
LONDON
The UN expert overseeing the use of armed drones has demanded greater accountability and transparency by those states using them - including public investigations into allegations of civilian casualties.
Ben Emmerson, UN Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms while countering terrorism, investigated 37 recent drone strikes in countries. In Yemen he noted a sharp rise in strikes and a "significant number" of civilian casualties since the end of 2013.
His report cites the following cases, supported by legal charity Reprieve, as requiring prompt investigation:
- a March 2011 strike in North Waziristan, Pakistan that killed Malik Daud Khan, whose son, Noor Khan, has taken legal action against the UK government;
- a strike in October 2011 on a car and a house in North Waziristan, Pakistan that killed Tariq Aziz and Waheed Ullah, two teenagers on their way to play football;
- an October 2012 strike in North Waziristan, Pakistan that killed Mammana Bibi, a 67-year-old grandmother, as she picked vegetables in the field by her home;
- the August 2012 killing of Salem Ahmed bin Ali Jaber, an imam who preached against al-Qaeda, and his nephew, a local policeman, in Hadhramout, Yemen;
- a September 2012 airstrike on a bus in Radaa, Yemen that killed 11 civilians, including a pregnant woman and three children;
- a December 2013 strike on a wedding party in Radaa, Yemen that killed 12 civilians.
Emmerson's findings come as pressure builds on the US and European countries involved in the covert CIA-led programme. The US is currently under review by the UN's Human Rights Committee (HRC) on its compliance with the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) - Article 6 of which enshrines the right to life. Meanwhile, the European Parliament last week condemned the use of drones, and called for countries like the UK and Germany to disclose their role in supporting the strikes.
In Yemen, where the national parliament recently voted to outlaw drone strikes, Faisal bin Ali Jaber, brother-in-law of killed imam Salem Ahmed bin Ali Jaber, said: "President Obama's drone strikes killed my nephew and my brother-in-law Salem; a man who was famed for his sermons denouncing al-Qaeda. What possible justification could there be for these strikes? I hope that this new report will finally encourage the US and its allies to provide some answers."
Rafiq Rehman, the son of victim Mammana Bibi, said: "Drone strikes in Pakistan have devastated my family and brought only fear and suffering to my community; yet we still have had no explanation as to why they happened, and who was responsible. I still hope that we might one day see justice and an end to these catastrophic strikes in Pakistan."
Kat Craig, Legal Director at Reprieve, said: "In Yemen, Pakistan and elsewhere, the US, assisted by its European allies, is carrying out devastating attacks with total impunity - a practice that is terrorising local communities, and creating far more extremism than it has ever eliminated. It is high time that the US provided full accountability and transparency around its use of drones, and investigated civilian casualties. This report will only increase pressure on the US to bring their covert programme out of the shadows."
ENDS
Notes to editors
1. For further information, please contact Clemency Wells or Donald Campbell in Reprieve's press office: +44 (0) 207 553 8161 / 8166 or clemency.wells / donald.campbell@reprieve.org.uk
2. The full UN report can be found here.
4. For more information on the HRC review of the US, visit the website of the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights: https://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/ccpr.aspx
Reprieve is a UK-based human rights organization that uses the law to enforce the human rights of prisoners, from death row to Guantanamo Bay.
LATEST NEWS
Trump's Reflecting Pool Disaster Exposed as More Details Revealed on Firm That Won No-Bid Contract
An expert analysis conducted this week found algae levels in the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool at their highest levels in at least five years.
Jun 19, 2026
New reports have revealed the full scope of President Donald Trump's disastrous renovation of the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool, which the National Park Service this week has been scrambling to clean up.
A Thursday report in The New York Times revealed that the firm tapped to install the pool's water purification system, Greenwater Services, was given a $1.7 million contract that "bypassed the competitive-bidding process that is typically required" for such projects.
Even though Greenwater had only received one other federal contract in the past, NPS said it bypassed the normal bidding process on the grounds that "there was no time to consider other offers because the system had to be installed in time for events celebrating the country’s 250th birthday," reported the Times.
The Times also found that Greenwater is owned by JJ Cafaro Investment Trust, whose owner is a Trump donor and "a neighbor to Mar-a-Lago, the president’s private club in Florida."
The firm's work has come under scrutiny in recent days after a massive algae bloom erupted in the pool, which prompted NPS workers to dump containers of hydrogen peroxide into the water, which had turned a fluorescent green.
As noted by the Times, the NPS refilled the pool before Greenwater had installed a permanent water purification system, which the paper wrote raised "the risk that it would quickly be clouded with algae."
While algae blooms have long been common in the Reflecting Pool, The Washington Post on Thursday commissioned expert analysis of satellite imagery and determined that this year's bloom was the largest to occur in the last five years and that "algae levels spiked days after Trump’s renovation was completed."
Alana Menendez, a postdoctoral researcher at the University of Virginia’s Department of Environmental Sciences, told the Post that there was more algae in the Reflecting Pool on the first week after its reopening than in any other June satellite images of the pool going all the way back to 2021.
Algae blooms aren't the only problem facing the pool, as CNN reported on Thursday that some of the blue material that had been installed at the bottom of the pool as part of the renovation has started peeling off.
Specifically, CNN said that its reporters "observed a flap of blue material that was partially attached to the bottom in one area of the pool and floating toward the top," although the network added that "it is unclear if the material is paint or sealant, and it's unclear what caused it to come up."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Out of Step' US Condemned for Trying to Erase Climate From Scientific Report for Antarctic Treaty
"This of course reflects Trump administration policy, which counters any focus on climate at international meetings," said a US researcher and former diplomat.
Jun 19, 2026
The Trump administration is under fire over its efforts to have any mention of the climate crisis removed from a scientific report, published this week, aimed at informing nations that are party to a global treaty designed to protect the Antarctic.
Details of the "diplomatic tensions" surrounding the report, which took place during a meeting in May with delegates from around the world focused on the Antarctic Treaty, were detailed by Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) correspondent Jano Gibson.
According to Gibson:
The report reveals that France took issue with the US's suggestion not to use broad terms such as "climate change" and instead refer to "specific" environmental changes.
"France … expressed it had strong concern about the gradual disappearance of references to climate change in the work of the Committee [for Environmental Protection]," the report states.
"France emphasized that climate change was a reality affecting all countries, regardless of borders.
Claire Christian, executive director of the Antarctic and Southern Ocean Coalition, told ABC that there's zero controversy within the scientific community that a changing climate due to global warming is having deep impacts on the Antarctic region.
"The evidence is clear: the Antarctic region is undergoing rapid climate change, and this is already having significant effects on planetary systems," Christian said. "If we don't reduce our carbon emissions rapidly, these effects will only become more severe and unpredictable."
While a France warned that "refusing to even name climate change" would set "a dangerous precedent," Evan Bloom, a former US diplomat and Antarctic researcher involved in international negotiations on the topic said the position taken by the US at the Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting was very much in keeping with the behavior and policies of President Donald Trump.
The US position, said Bloom, "shows how out of step the US is with most of the rest of the world on climate change. Yet, this of course reflects Trump administration policy, which counters any focus on climate at international meetings."
Keep ReadingShow Less
UN Experts Demands Nations ‘Break Their Silence’ as Trump, Hegseth Murder 3 More People at Sea
The Trump administration has killed at least 211 people by bombing boats in the Caribbean Sea and Pacific Ocean since last September.
Jun 19, 2026
As US senators pushed the Department of Defense to release unedited footage of the boat bombings the Trump administration has carried out in the Caribbean Sea and Pacific Ocean since last September, US Southern Command on Thursday announced that it had killed three more people in the operation that some international law experts have said amounts to mass murder and an extrajudicial killing spree.
As with the other announcements of boat bombings, at least 65 of which the US has now carried out, Southern Command released no evidence Thursday night of its claim that the vessel it bombed was “operated by Designated Terrorist Organizations,” “engaged in narco-trafficking operations," or that the three people killed were “narco-terrorists.”
Victims of the previous boat bombings have included fishermen and other people who had no involvement with drug trafficking, according to legal complaints filed by families.
Ben Saul, the United Nations special rapporteur on human rights and counterterrorism, called on international governments to "break their silence and jointly condemn these murders," noting that the death toll of the administration's operation is now at least 211 people.
Some international officials, including French Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot and Colombian President Gustavo Petro, have strongly denounced the boat bombings and accused Trump of breaking international law. Some countries have ended or dialed back intelligence sharing with the US. But human rights groups have called on the international community to take a unified stance against the boat strikes.
"Sick of hearing, 'I didn't know those boat strikes are still happening. Silence leaves the impression that this is somehow OK," said Adam Isacson of the Washington Office on Latin America on Thursday, adding that the US Coast Guard had called off its search for two survivors of an earlier boat bombing this week, potentially bringing the total death toll to 213.
President Donald Trump has claimed the US is engaged in an "armed conflict" with cartels in Latin America and has said the boat bombing campaign is aimed at stopping illegal drugs like fentanyl from flowing into the US. According to the US State Department's 2025 report on international narcotics control, Mexico is the "only significant source of illicit fentanyl and fentanyl analogues significantly affecting the United States," with the drug mainly entering the US via the southern border.
In an analysis of Customs and Border Protection data in April, Isacson emphasized that the lethal boat strikes have not stopped drugs from entering the US.
Even if the administration were targeting drug traffickers as it claims, bombing vessels involved in the drug trade is a violation of international laws protecting civilians from military force. Since the US is not officially engaged in an armed conflict with drug cartels, the accused "narco-terrorists" the Trump administration has killed have all been civilians.
Legal experts also say that US Southern Command's killing of survivors of initial strikes by bombing them again, would also be war crimes in an armed conflict.
Earlier this week, after another boat bombing that killed at least one person, Saul called for "those who ordered and carried out these crimes to be investigated, prosecuted, and punished, in line with international law."
On June 24, the ACLU and the Center for Constitutional Rights are set to argue before the US District Court for the Southern District of New York for the immediate release of a secret legal memo authored by the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel, which the Trump administration has repeatedly claimed gives the president and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth the authority to kill people at sea.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular