

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Jim Puckett: 206-354-0391; Sarah Westervelt: 206-604-9024
The toxic waste watchdog organization, the Basel Action Network
(BAN), is warning consumers to be extremely careful about where they take their
old TVs for recycling following the nationwide conversion from
analog-to-digital broadcasting. They are urging consumers to only use qualified
e-Steward recyclers, the only list identifying electronic waste recyclers that
will not export toxic TVs and other electronic waste to a developing country.
After today when many Americans wake up to no TV
signal without a special converter box, cable or satellite, many will
make the choice to finally upgrade their old "cathode ray tube" TV to a
slick new flat screen TV. Their old TV is obsolete and now a waste
object for disposal, and smart consumers may believe that recycling is
a better choice than placing it in a dumpster or at the curbside.
But BAN warns that currently, due to a lack of legislation forbidding
such trade, about 80% of those companies calling themselves
"recyclers" in North America will simply export your old TV to
countries like China, India, or Nigeria where the toxic leaded glass,
cadmium, and brominated flame retardants which are found in materials
in old TVs will poison villagers using primitive technologies to recover some materials, and then dump or burn the rest of the electronic waste.(1)
"There are few regulations in place and the ones that do exist are easily
circumvented. So many of these so-called recyclers take your TV or computer
for free, or pocket your environmental fee, and then just turn around and ship
your old TV to China or Vietnam," said Sarah Westervelt e-Stewardship
Director at BAN. "There, our old entertainment devices end up causing misery
and disease, and ultimately contaminate the entire planet, distributing lead,
mercury, and cadmium into the ecosphere - not a good plan for anyone,
anywhere."
It has been conservatively estimated by some recyclers that due to the digital
conversion, about one in four households will get rid of a TV this year. If
that is true, it would mean 27,790,564 TVs, each containing an average of 5
pounds of lead, will be disposed or recycled. And with 80% of this total
shunted offshore to developing countries, about 56,000 tons of toxic lead alone
would be transferred and dumped on some of the world's poorest communties.
In 2002 and 2005, BAN released two documentary films, Exporting Harm and The Digital Dump,
shining a spotlight on the horrors of the global e-waste trade and its
very damaging impacts of toxic constituents in electronic products on
the workers and environments of communities in Africa and China. Last
year they went with CBS's 60 Minutes program to China and
found the devastation of the environment from imported e-waste had
gotten far worse. Recent studies in Guiyu, China, ground zero of the
international waste trade, show some of the highest levels of dioxin,
lead and other cancer-causing pollutants ever recorded. Lead in the
blood of 80 percent of the Guiyu's children is dangerously high and
already demonstrable brain impairment has been recorded.
A
2008 report by the Government Accountability Office (GAO) condemned the
EPA for not having comprehensive rules to control e-waste exports and
poorly enforcing the one law that does exist for TVs and Computer
monitors known as the "CRT Rule".(2) Since then, the EPA has begun
welcomed enforcement of that rule, but unfortunately the law contains
loopholes, exempting much of the leaded glass from regulation. BAN,
together with the Electronics TakeBack Coalition (ETBC), is currently
seeking national legislation to ban the export of all toxic e-waste
(not just CRTs) to developing countries as all European countries have
already done.(3) And BAN has created the e-Stewards Initiative - a
list of responsible e-cyclers* that have agreed not to export hazardous
e-wastes to developing countries.
"The
current legislative landscape is a haven for 'waste cowboys' that use
developing countries as global dumping grounds when there is a profit
to be made," said Jim Puckett, BAN's Executive Director. "The e-Stewards are ethical recyclers that will not export toxic e-Waste under the false pretext of recycling or reuse."
Photos, research and documentation available:
Photographs available at: www.ban.org/photogallery/ and others upon request.
*For a list of e-Steward Recyclers: www.e-Stewards.org.
The e-Stewards recyclers are currently subject to significant desk
audits, verifying all of their downstream destinations throughout the
recycling chain of toxic wastes, as defined internationally. However,
the program will soon become an accredited, third party audited,
certification program. For more information check the website above.
For more information on illegal and irresponsible e-waste export: www.ban.org
Basel Action Network's mission is to champion global environmental health and justice by ending toxic trade, catalyzing a toxics-free future, and campaigning for everyone's right to a clean environment.
"They have spoken openly about controlling Venezuela’s oil reserves, the largest in the world," said US Sen. Bernie Sanders. "It recalls the darkest chapters of US interventions in Latin America."
US President Donald Trump left no doubt on Saturday that a—or perhaps the—primary driver of his decision to illegally attack Venezuela, abduct its president, and pledge to indefinitely run its government was his desire to control and exploit the country's oil reserves, which are believed to be the largest in the world.
Over the course of Trump's lengthy press conference following Saturday's assault, the word "oil" was mentioned dozens of times as the president vowed to unleash powerful fossil fuel giants on the South American nation and begin "taking a tremendous amount of wealth out of the ground"—with a healthy cut of it going to the US "in the form of reimbursement" for the supposed "damages caused us" by Venezuela.
"We're going to have our very large United States oil companies, the biggest anywhere in the world, go in, spend billions of dollars, fix the badly broken infrastructure, and start making money for the country," Trump said. "We're going to get the oil flowing the way it should be."
Currently, Chevron is the only US-based oil giant operating in Venezuela, whose oil industry and broader economy have been badly hampered by US sanctions. In a statement on Saturday, a Chevron spokesperson said the company is "prepared to work constructively with the US government during this period, leveraging our experience and presence to strengthen US energy security."
Other oil behemoths, some of which helped bankroll Trump's presidential campaign, are likely licking their chops—even if they've been mostly quiet in the wake of the US attack, which was widely condemned as unlawful and potentially catastrophic for the region. Amnesty International said Saturday that "the stated US intention to run Venezuela and control its oil resources" likely "constitutes a violation of international law."
"The most powerful multinational fossil fuel corporations stand to benefit from these aggressions, and US oil and gas companies are poised to exploit the chaos."
Thomas O'Donnell, an energy and geopolitical strategist, told Reuters that "the company that probably will be very interested in going back [to Venezuela] is Conoco," noting that an international arbitration tribunal has ordered Caracas to pay the company around $10 billion for alleged "unlawful expropriation" of oil investments.
The Houston Chronicle reported that "Exxon, America’s largest oil company, which has for years grown its presence in South America, would be among the most likely US oil companies to tap Venezuela’s deep oil reserves. The company, along with fellow Houston giant ConocoPhillips, had a number of failed contract attempts with Venezuela under Maduro and former President Hugo Chavez."
Elizabeth Bast, executive director of the advocacy group Oil Change International, said in a statement Saturday that the Trump administration's escalation in Venezuela "follows a historic playbook: undermine leftist governments, create instability, and clear the path for extractive companies to profit."
"The most powerful multinational fossil fuel corporations stand to benefit from these aggressions, and US oil and gas companies are poised to exploit the chaos and carve up one of the world's most oil-rich territories," said Bast. "The US must stop treating Latin America as a resource colony. The Venezuelan people, not US oil executives, must shape their country’s future."
US Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) said that the president's own words make plain that his attack on Venezuela and attempt to impose his will there are "about trying to grab Venezuela's oil for Trump's billionaire buddies."
In a statement, US Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) echoed that sentiment, calling Trump's assault on Venezuela "rank imperialism."
"They have spoken openly about controlling Venezuela’s oil reserves, the largest in the world," said Sanders. "It recalls the darkest chapters of US interventions in Latin America, which have left a terrible legacy. It will and should be condemned by the democratic world."
“What is being done to Venezuela is barbaric," said Delcy Rodríguez, who assumed the role of interim president following the US abduction of Nicolás Maduro.
Venezuelan Vice President Delcy Rodríguez, who assumed the role of interim president following the US abduction of Nicolás Maduro, said in a televised address Saturday that "we will never again be a colony of any empire," defying the Trump administration's plan to indefinitely control Venezuela's government and exploit its vast oil reserves.
“We are determined to be free,” declared Rodríguez, who demanded that the US release Maduro from custody and said he is still Venezuela's president.
“What is being done to Venezuela is barbaric," she added.
Rodríguez's defiant remarks came after US President Donald Trump claimed he is "designating various people" to run Venezuela's government, suggested American troops could be deployed, and threatened a "second wave" of attacks on the country if its political officials don't bow to the Trump administration's demands.
Trump also threatened "all political and military figures in Venezuela," warning that "what happened to Maduro can happen to them." Maduro is currently detained in Brooklyn and facing fresh US charges.
Rodríguez's public remarks contradicted the US president's claim that she privately pledged compliance with the Trump administration's attempts to control Venezuela's political system and oil infrastructure. The interim president delivered her remarks alongside top Venezuelan officials, including legislative and judicial leaders, Interior Minister Diosdado Cabello, and Defense Minister Vladimir Padrino, a projection of unity in the face of US aggression.
"Doesn’t feel like a nation that is ready to let Donald Trump and Marco Rubio 'run it,'" said US Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.), who condemned the Trump administration for "starting an illegal war with Venezuela that Americans didn’t ask for and has nothing to do with our security."
"The 'Trump corollary' to the Monroe Doctrine—applied in recent hours with violent force over the skies of Caracas—is the single greatest threat to peace and prosperity that the Americas confront today," said Progressive International.
US President Donald Trump and top administration officials, including Secretary of State Marco Rubio, characterized Saturday's assault on Venezuela and abduction of the country's president as a warning shot in the direction of Cuba, Mexico, Colombia, and other Latin American nations.
During a Saturday press conference, Trump openly invoked the Monroe Doctrine—an assertion of US dominance of the Western Hemisphere—and said his campaign of aggression against Venezuela represented the "Donroe Doctrine" in action.
In his unwieldy remarks, Trump called out Colombian President Gustavo Petro by name, accusing him without evidence of "making cocaine and sending it to the United States."
"So he does have to watch his ass," the US president said of Petro, who condemned the Trump administration's Saturday attack on Venezuela as "aggression against the sovereignty of Venezuela and Latin America."
Petro responded defiantly to the possibility of the US targeting him, writing on social media that he is "not worried at all."
In a Fox News appearance earlier Saturday, Trump also took aim at the United States' southern neighbor, declaring ominously that "something's going to have to be done with Mexico," which also denounced the attack on Venezuela and abduction of President Nicolás Maduro.
"She is very frightened of the cartels," Trump said of Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum. "So we have to do something."
"This armed attack on Venezuela is not an isolated event. It is the next step in the United States' campaign of regime change that stretches from Caracas to Havana."
Rubio, for his part, focused on Cuba—a country whose government he has long sought to topple.
"If I lived in Havana and I was in the government, I'd be concerned, at least a little bit," Rubio, who was born in Miami to Cuban immigrant parents, said during Saturday's press conference.
That the Trump administration wasted no time threatening other nations as it pledged to control Venezuela indefinitely sparked grave warnings, with the leadership of Progressive International cautioning that "this armed attack on Venezuela is not an isolated event."
"It is the next step in the United States' campaign of regime change that stretches from Caracas to Havana—and an attack on the very principle of sovereign equality and the prospects for the Zone of Peace once established by the Community of Latin American and Caribbean States," the coalition said in a statement. "This renewed declaration of impunity from Washington is a threat to all nations around the world."
"Trump has clearly articulated the imperial logic of this intervention—to seize control over Venezuela's natural resources and reassert US domination over the hemisphere," said Progressive International. "The 'Trump corollary' to the Monroe Doctrine—applied in recent hours with violent force over the skies of Caracas—is the single greatest threat to peace and prosperity that the Americas confront today."