Climate Expert Slams Australian PM, Other Leaders for 'Willful Blindness' Over Climate Change
David Suzuki says Australia PM and other climate-denying politicians should be charged with 'criminal negligence'

Abbot, who is known for his climate change denialism, came into power this month and almost immediately axed Australia's national climate watchdog, the Climate Commission. He has also promised to toss out the country's carbon-trading program.
On two separate occasions Suzuki called out Abbott and like-minded politicians for "very, very dangerous" denialism, beginning with a speech at the University of NSW on Saturday in which he accused Abbott of "criminal negligence," adding that the ultra-rich are also to blame for pushing denialism in the never-ending quest for profit:
Environmentalism is a way of seeing our place within the biosphere. That's what the battles were fought over. The barbarians - that is, many of the politicians and corporate executives that environmentalists have been fighting all these years - are driven by a totally different set of values, by the drive for profit, for growth and for power.
And on Monday, on Australia's ABC program Q&A, Suzuki was asked, "David, you've urged, at least twice, that legal ways should be found to jail politicians for denying what you call the science of climate change. David, do you still hold that view?"
Suzuki responded:
You bet. I think there is a category called willful blindness. Our problem is we have no means of holding our so-called leaders - people we elect to political office to lead us into the future - we have no way to keep them accountable, except booting them out of office. But the reverberations of what they do or do not do today are rippling far beyond the coming years. There will be generational impacts. Now, if you have people who stand up to take positions of leadership and they deliberately suppress or ignore information vital to making an informed decision, I think that's willful blindness, and willful blindness, I understand, is a legal entity that you can sue people for.
Suzuki added, "I think it's a crazy, dangerous situation if we're going to marginalize science in favor of political priorities. I think that's very, very dangerous."
_______________________
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Jacob Chamberlain is a former staff writer for Common Dreams. He is the author of Migrant Justice in the Age of Removal. His website is www.jacobpchamberlain.com.

Abbot, who is known for his climate change denialism, came into power this month and almost immediately axed Australia's national climate watchdog, the Climate Commission. He has also promised to toss out the country's carbon-trading program.
On two separate occasions Suzuki called out Abbott and like-minded politicians for "very, very dangerous" denialism, beginning with a speech at the University of NSW on Saturday in which he accused Abbott of "criminal negligence," adding that the ultra-rich are also to blame for pushing denialism in the never-ending quest for profit:
Environmentalism is a way of seeing our place within the biosphere. That's what the battles were fought over. The barbarians - that is, many of the politicians and corporate executives that environmentalists have been fighting all these years - are driven by a totally different set of values, by the drive for profit, for growth and for power.
And on Monday, on Australia's ABC program Q&A, Suzuki was asked, "David, you've urged, at least twice, that legal ways should be found to jail politicians for denying what you call the science of climate change. David, do you still hold that view?"
Suzuki responded:
You bet. I think there is a category called willful blindness. Our problem is we have no means of holding our so-called leaders - people we elect to political office to lead us into the future - we have no way to keep them accountable, except booting them out of office. But the reverberations of what they do or do not do today are rippling far beyond the coming years. There will be generational impacts. Now, if you have people who stand up to take positions of leadership and they deliberately suppress or ignore information vital to making an informed decision, I think that's willful blindness, and willful blindness, I understand, is a legal entity that you can sue people for.
Suzuki added, "I think it's a crazy, dangerous situation if we're going to marginalize science in favor of political priorities. I think that's very, very dangerous."
_______________________
Jacob Chamberlain is a former staff writer for Common Dreams. He is the author of Migrant Justice in the Age of Removal. His website is www.jacobpchamberlain.com.

Abbot, who is known for his climate change denialism, came into power this month and almost immediately axed Australia's national climate watchdog, the Climate Commission. He has also promised to toss out the country's carbon-trading program.
On two separate occasions Suzuki called out Abbott and like-minded politicians for "very, very dangerous" denialism, beginning with a speech at the University of NSW on Saturday in which he accused Abbott of "criminal negligence," adding that the ultra-rich are also to blame for pushing denialism in the never-ending quest for profit:
Environmentalism is a way of seeing our place within the biosphere. That's what the battles were fought over. The barbarians - that is, many of the politicians and corporate executives that environmentalists have been fighting all these years - are driven by a totally different set of values, by the drive for profit, for growth and for power.
And on Monday, on Australia's ABC program Q&A, Suzuki was asked, "David, you've urged, at least twice, that legal ways should be found to jail politicians for denying what you call the science of climate change. David, do you still hold that view?"
Suzuki responded:
You bet. I think there is a category called willful blindness. Our problem is we have no means of holding our so-called leaders - people we elect to political office to lead us into the future - we have no way to keep them accountable, except booting them out of office. But the reverberations of what they do or do not do today are rippling far beyond the coming years. There will be generational impacts. Now, if you have people who stand up to take positions of leadership and they deliberately suppress or ignore information vital to making an informed decision, I think that's willful blindness, and willful blindness, I understand, is a legal entity that you can sue people for.
Suzuki added, "I think it's a crazy, dangerous situation if we're going to marginalize science in favor of political priorities. I think that's very, very dangerous."
_______________________

