US in Afghanistan for 'A Few Years'
The
US defence secretary has said there is a possibility of an increased
military presence in Afghanistan, but warned that such a move would
stretch military resources and could lead to a possible Afghan backlash.
Speaking to reporters in Washington, Robert Gates painted a bleak
portrait of the prospects for the US mission in Afghanistan, noting
that Taliban fighters had a firm hold on parts of the country and
defeating them would take "a few years".
His
comments comes amid intense speculation that General Stanley
McChrystal, the commander of US forces in Afghanistan, is preparing to
make a case for more troops in the fight against the Taliban.
Afghanistan has seen an escalation in Taliban attacks in recent days
as the country prepares for next week's presidential elections, with at
least three separate attacks on Thursday alone.
Speaking
at the Pentagon Gates said that he and Admiral Mike Mullen, the
chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, had told McChrystal, that
"[they] want him to ask for what he thinks he needs", adding "I think
you have to allow your commanders that freedom."
But with about 132,000 troops currently in Iraq, Gates said there
were constraints as to how many extra troops could be sent to
Afghanistan at least until after Iraq's elections in January.
Military 'footprint'
Gates also repeated his concerns about too big of a US military
"footprint," in Afghanistan, saying at the moment, local residents see
the coalition of forces as "their partner".
"I just worry that we don't know what the size of the military presence might be that would begin to change that," he said. Barack
Obama, the US president, has made Afghanistan one of his top foreign
policy priorities and has already ordered an additional 21,000 troops
to Afghanistan.
That will push the number of US forces in the country to 68,000 before the end of the year.
His administration, however, is struggling on how to refocus on Afghanistan, while withdrawing US troops from Iraq.
In a report released this week, the Senate Foreign Relations
Committee warned Obama that unanswered questions about continuing US
involvement in Afghanistan could frustrate the public.
"The administration has raised the stakes by transforming the Afghan
war from a limited intervention into a more ambitious and potentially
risky counterinsurgency,'' the report said.
"These core questions about commitment and sacrifice can be answered only through a rigorous and informed national debate."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
The
US defence secretary has said there is a possibility of an increased
military presence in Afghanistan, but warned that such a move would
stretch military resources and could lead to a possible Afghan backlash.
Speaking to reporters in Washington, Robert Gates painted a bleak
portrait of the prospects for the US mission in Afghanistan, noting
that Taliban fighters had a firm hold on parts of the country and
defeating them would take "a few years".
His
comments comes amid intense speculation that General Stanley
McChrystal, the commander of US forces in Afghanistan, is preparing to
make a case for more troops in the fight against the Taliban.
Afghanistan has seen an escalation in Taliban attacks in recent days
as the country prepares for next week's presidential elections, with at
least three separate attacks on Thursday alone.
Speaking
at the Pentagon Gates said that he and Admiral Mike Mullen, the
chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, had told McChrystal, that
"[they] want him to ask for what he thinks he needs", adding "I think
you have to allow your commanders that freedom."
But with about 132,000 troops currently in Iraq, Gates said there
were constraints as to how many extra troops could be sent to
Afghanistan at least until after Iraq's elections in January.
Military 'footprint'
Gates also repeated his concerns about too big of a US military
"footprint," in Afghanistan, saying at the moment, local residents see
the coalition of forces as "their partner".
"I just worry that we don't know what the size of the military presence might be that would begin to change that," he said. Barack
Obama, the US president, has made Afghanistan one of his top foreign
policy priorities and has already ordered an additional 21,000 troops
to Afghanistan.
That will push the number of US forces in the country to 68,000 before the end of the year.
His administration, however, is struggling on how to refocus on Afghanistan, while withdrawing US troops from Iraq.
In a report released this week, the Senate Foreign Relations
Committee warned Obama that unanswered questions about continuing US
involvement in Afghanistan could frustrate the public.
"The administration has raised the stakes by transforming the Afghan
war from a limited intervention into a more ambitious and potentially
risky counterinsurgency,'' the report said.
"These core questions about commitment and sacrifice can be answered only through a rigorous and informed national debate."
The
US defence secretary has said there is a possibility of an increased
military presence in Afghanistan, but warned that such a move would
stretch military resources and could lead to a possible Afghan backlash.
Speaking to reporters in Washington, Robert Gates painted a bleak
portrait of the prospects for the US mission in Afghanistan, noting
that Taliban fighters had a firm hold on parts of the country and
defeating them would take "a few years".
His
comments comes amid intense speculation that General Stanley
McChrystal, the commander of US forces in Afghanistan, is preparing to
make a case for more troops in the fight against the Taliban.
Afghanistan has seen an escalation in Taliban attacks in recent days
as the country prepares for next week's presidential elections, with at
least three separate attacks on Thursday alone.
Speaking
at the Pentagon Gates said that he and Admiral Mike Mullen, the
chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, had told McChrystal, that
"[they] want him to ask for what he thinks he needs", adding "I think
you have to allow your commanders that freedom."
But with about 132,000 troops currently in Iraq, Gates said there
were constraints as to how many extra troops could be sent to
Afghanistan at least until after Iraq's elections in January.
Military 'footprint'
Gates also repeated his concerns about too big of a US military
"footprint," in Afghanistan, saying at the moment, local residents see
the coalition of forces as "their partner".
"I just worry that we don't know what the size of the military presence might be that would begin to change that," he said. Barack
Obama, the US president, has made Afghanistan one of his top foreign
policy priorities and has already ordered an additional 21,000 troops
to Afghanistan.
That will push the number of US forces in the country to 68,000 before the end of the year.
His administration, however, is struggling on how to refocus on Afghanistan, while withdrawing US troops from Iraq.
In a report released this week, the Senate Foreign Relations
Committee warned Obama that unanswered questions about continuing US
involvement in Afghanistan could frustrate the public.
"The administration has raised the stakes by transforming the Afghan
war from a limited intervention into a more ambitious and potentially
risky counterinsurgency,'' the report said.
"These core questions about commitment and sacrifice can be answered only through a rigorous and informed national debate."