Mar 04, 2018
In December, 2002, President George W. Bush proclaimed that the U.S. would unilaterally pull out of the 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty that had curtailed the development of nuclear missiles and anti-missile systems to defeat them.
This week, President Putin stunned the world by revealing a new arsenal of nuclear-armed weapons that have stolen a march on Washington and left the warlike President Donald Trump looking foolish.
The arrogant, dim-witted Bush believed that U.S. space technology was advancing so rapidly that it would neutralize Russia's force of ICBM missiles. Bush was just a puppet. The real power behind him was Vice President Dick Cheney, the leading neocon who sneered at Russia, dismissed it as a mere 'gas-station,' and was determined to see the U.S. achieve global dominance.
In Cheney's view, the ABM Treaty was holding the U.S. back from this goal. Bankrupt Moscow would never be able to stand up to the mighty USA. Moscow warned that reneging on the ABM Treaty would re-ignite a ruinous arms race. A then little known politician, Vladimir Putin, vowed that Russia would never bend its knee to the U.S. nuclear colossus.
This week, President Putin stunned the world by revealing a new arsenal of nuclear-armed weapons that have stolen a march on Washington and left the warlike President Donald Trump looking foolish.
Russia's new arms include the RS-28 heavy ICBM, called 'Satan 2' by NATO. This big brute of a liquid fueled missile can carry up to ten nuclear warheads over 10,000 km (6,000 miles). What makes it very different from other ICBM's is its ability (Russia claims) to carry nuclear-armed hypersonic vehicles through low earth orbit that can attack North America from multiple directions unseen by the radars of anti-missile systems.
President Putin also revealed a new nuclear-armed cruise missile propelled by a miniature nuclear engine that can stay aloft for very long periods and fly over Latin America and the South Pole to attack North America from the south. The U.S. has been trying to develop such a nuclear engine since the late 1950s, but with no success. During the corrupt Yeltsin era, the Kremlin accepted huge amounts of cash bribes to sell a miniaturized reactor to the Americans designed to power ocean surveillance satellites.
This miniature reactor will also power Russia's new unmanned submarine which can carry a very large nuclear explosive--even up to 25 megatons--to the North American coasts or U.S. aircraft carrier groups.
Putin also unveiled a new hypersonic glider deployed from space (the U.S. and China have been working on one, so far unsuccessfully), and an aircraft launched Mach-10 missile called 'Kinzhal' after the deadly dagger carried by Caucasian mountaineers. And, on top of this, a combat laser system that is being deployed. The U.S. has been working on one since the Vietnam War.
All this is a bombshell. Maybe Putin was boasting and exaggerating, but he usually tells the truth, unlike our politicians, and rarely embellishes. As he said in his speech, 'nobody wanted to listen to us,' referring to Moscow's failed attempted to restore a strategic arms agreement, cut nuclear forces and lower tensions with the West. 'Now,' said Putin, 'you listen.'
Will we risk the life of the planet over a stupid quarrel over some one-tractor town in Ukraine or a Syrian village no one has ever heard of? Yes, if the neocons have their way.
But will Washington listen? Trump has just announced a huge modernization of America's nuclear forces and a big increase in the military budget from $634 billion to $716 billion, with an additional $69 billion to fund 'foreign wars.' The real U.S. military budget is close to $1 trillion (that's 1,000 billion), not including the U.S. intelligence budget which is larger that Russia's entire annual defense budget, a meager $42.3 billion.
Washington's war party has convinced itself that Russia can be intimidated and once again spent into the ground. But Vladimir Putin is too smart and deft to allow this to happen. He has neatly trumped Trump's arms buildup and shown up Trump's empty bullying. So, for that mater, has North Korea's Kim Jong Un.
One hopes Washington's deep government that has been promoting a run-up to war with Russia in the Mideast, Ukraine, Baltic and Black Sea will be sufficiently sobered by Putin's show this week. They should be. The multiple warheads on one new RS-28 missile could destroy Texas or France. Russia's new missiles and space gliders can outflank America's anti-missile radars in Alaska and Romania, rendering them as useless as France's Maginot Line.
War must never, ever be allowed to occur with Russia and China and the United States. Will we risk the life of the planet over a stupid quarrel over some one-tractor town in Ukraine or a Syrian village no one has ever heard of? Yes, if the neocons have their way.
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
© 2023 Eric Margolis
Eric Margolis
Eric Margolis is a columnist, author and a veteran of many conflicts in the Middle East. Margolis was featured in a special appearance on Britain's Sky News TV as "the man who got it right" in his predictions about the dangerous risks and entanglements the US would face in Iraq. His latest book is "American Raj: Liberation or Domination?: Resolving the Conflict Between the West and the Muslim World."
In December, 2002, President George W. Bush proclaimed that the U.S. would unilaterally pull out of the 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty that had curtailed the development of nuclear missiles and anti-missile systems to defeat them.
This week, President Putin stunned the world by revealing a new arsenal of nuclear-armed weapons that have stolen a march on Washington and left the warlike President Donald Trump looking foolish.
The arrogant, dim-witted Bush believed that U.S. space technology was advancing so rapidly that it would neutralize Russia's force of ICBM missiles. Bush was just a puppet. The real power behind him was Vice President Dick Cheney, the leading neocon who sneered at Russia, dismissed it as a mere 'gas-station,' and was determined to see the U.S. achieve global dominance.
In Cheney's view, the ABM Treaty was holding the U.S. back from this goal. Bankrupt Moscow would never be able to stand up to the mighty USA. Moscow warned that reneging on the ABM Treaty would re-ignite a ruinous arms race. A then little known politician, Vladimir Putin, vowed that Russia would never bend its knee to the U.S. nuclear colossus.
This week, President Putin stunned the world by revealing a new arsenal of nuclear-armed weapons that have stolen a march on Washington and left the warlike President Donald Trump looking foolish.
Russia's new arms include the RS-28 heavy ICBM, called 'Satan 2' by NATO. This big brute of a liquid fueled missile can carry up to ten nuclear warheads over 10,000 km (6,000 miles). What makes it very different from other ICBM's is its ability (Russia claims) to carry nuclear-armed hypersonic vehicles through low earth orbit that can attack North America from multiple directions unseen by the radars of anti-missile systems.
President Putin also revealed a new nuclear-armed cruise missile propelled by a miniature nuclear engine that can stay aloft for very long periods and fly over Latin America and the South Pole to attack North America from the south. The U.S. has been trying to develop such a nuclear engine since the late 1950s, but with no success. During the corrupt Yeltsin era, the Kremlin accepted huge amounts of cash bribes to sell a miniaturized reactor to the Americans designed to power ocean surveillance satellites.
This miniature reactor will also power Russia's new unmanned submarine which can carry a very large nuclear explosive--even up to 25 megatons--to the North American coasts or U.S. aircraft carrier groups.
Putin also unveiled a new hypersonic glider deployed from space (the U.S. and China have been working on one, so far unsuccessfully), and an aircraft launched Mach-10 missile called 'Kinzhal' after the deadly dagger carried by Caucasian mountaineers. And, on top of this, a combat laser system that is being deployed. The U.S. has been working on one since the Vietnam War.
All this is a bombshell. Maybe Putin was boasting and exaggerating, but he usually tells the truth, unlike our politicians, and rarely embellishes. As he said in his speech, 'nobody wanted to listen to us,' referring to Moscow's failed attempted to restore a strategic arms agreement, cut nuclear forces and lower tensions with the West. 'Now,' said Putin, 'you listen.'
Will we risk the life of the planet over a stupid quarrel over some one-tractor town in Ukraine or a Syrian village no one has ever heard of? Yes, if the neocons have their way.
But will Washington listen? Trump has just announced a huge modernization of America's nuclear forces and a big increase in the military budget from $634 billion to $716 billion, with an additional $69 billion to fund 'foreign wars.' The real U.S. military budget is close to $1 trillion (that's 1,000 billion), not including the U.S. intelligence budget which is larger that Russia's entire annual defense budget, a meager $42.3 billion.
Washington's war party has convinced itself that Russia can be intimidated and once again spent into the ground. But Vladimir Putin is too smart and deft to allow this to happen. He has neatly trumped Trump's arms buildup and shown up Trump's empty bullying. So, for that mater, has North Korea's Kim Jong Un.
One hopes Washington's deep government that has been promoting a run-up to war with Russia in the Mideast, Ukraine, Baltic and Black Sea will be sufficiently sobered by Putin's show this week. They should be. The multiple warheads on one new RS-28 missile could destroy Texas or France. Russia's new missiles and space gliders can outflank America's anti-missile radars in Alaska and Romania, rendering them as useless as France's Maginot Line.
War must never, ever be allowed to occur with Russia and China and the United States. Will we risk the life of the planet over a stupid quarrel over some one-tractor town in Ukraine or a Syrian village no one has ever heard of? Yes, if the neocons have their way.
Eric Margolis
Eric Margolis is a columnist, author and a veteran of many conflicts in the Middle East. Margolis was featured in a special appearance on Britain's Sky News TV as "the man who got it right" in his predictions about the dangerous risks and entanglements the US would face in Iraq. His latest book is "American Raj: Liberation or Domination?: Resolving the Conflict Between the West and the Muslim World."
In December, 2002, President George W. Bush proclaimed that the U.S. would unilaterally pull out of the 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty that had curtailed the development of nuclear missiles and anti-missile systems to defeat them.
This week, President Putin stunned the world by revealing a new arsenal of nuclear-armed weapons that have stolen a march on Washington and left the warlike President Donald Trump looking foolish.
The arrogant, dim-witted Bush believed that U.S. space technology was advancing so rapidly that it would neutralize Russia's force of ICBM missiles. Bush was just a puppet. The real power behind him was Vice President Dick Cheney, the leading neocon who sneered at Russia, dismissed it as a mere 'gas-station,' and was determined to see the U.S. achieve global dominance.
In Cheney's view, the ABM Treaty was holding the U.S. back from this goal. Bankrupt Moscow would never be able to stand up to the mighty USA. Moscow warned that reneging on the ABM Treaty would re-ignite a ruinous arms race. A then little known politician, Vladimir Putin, vowed that Russia would never bend its knee to the U.S. nuclear colossus.
This week, President Putin stunned the world by revealing a new arsenal of nuclear-armed weapons that have stolen a march on Washington and left the warlike President Donald Trump looking foolish.
Russia's new arms include the RS-28 heavy ICBM, called 'Satan 2' by NATO. This big brute of a liquid fueled missile can carry up to ten nuclear warheads over 10,000 km (6,000 miles). What makes it very different from other ICBM's is its ability (Russia claims) to carry nuclear-armed hypersonic vehicles through low earth orbit that can attack North America from multiple directions unseen by the radars of anti-missile systems.
President Putin also revealed a new nuclear-armed cruise missile propelled by a miniature nuclear engine that can stay aloft for very long periods and fly over Latin America and the South Pole to attack North America from the south. The U.S. has been trying to develop such a nuclear engine since the late 1950s, but with no success. During the corrupt Yeltsin era, the Kremlin accepted huge amounts of cash bribes to sell a miniaturized reactor to the Americans designed to power ocean surveillance satellites.
This miniature reactor will also power Russia's new unmanned submarine which can carry a very large nuclear explosive--even up to 25 megatons--to the North American coasts or U.S. aircraft carrier groups.
Putin also unveiled a new hypersonic glider deployed from space (the U.S. and China have been working on one, so far unsuccessfully), and an aircraft launched Mach-10 missile called 'Kinzhal' after the deadly dagger carried by Caucasian mountaineers. And, on top of this, a combat laser system that is being deployed. The U.S. has been working on one since the Vietnam War.
All this is a bombshell. Maybe Putin was boasting and exaggerating, but he usually tells the truth, unlike our politicians, and rarely embellishes. As he said in his speech, 'nobody wanted to listen to us,' referring to Moscow's failed attempted to restore a strategic arms agreement, cut nuclear forces and lower tensions with the West. 'Now,' said Putin, 'you listen.'
Will we risk the life of the planet over a stupid quarrel over some one-tractor town in Ukraine or a Syrian village no one has ever heard of? Yes, if the neocons have their way.
But will Washington listen? Trump has just announced a huge modernization of America's nuclear forces and a big increase in the military budget from $634 billion to $716 billion, with an additional $69 billion to fund 'foreign wars.' The real U.S. military budget is close to $1 trillion (that's 1,000 billion), not including the U.S. intelligence budget which is larger that Russia's entire annual defense budget, a meager $42.3 billion.
Washington's war party has convinced itself that Russia can be intimidated and once again spent into the ground. But Vladimir Putin is too smart and deft to allow this to happen. He has neatly trumped Trump's arms buildup and shown up Trump's empty bullying. So, for that mater, has North Korea's Kim Jong Un.
One hopes Washington's deep government that has been promoting a run-up to war with Russia in the Mideast, Ukraine, Baltic and Black Sea will be sufficiently sobered by Putin's show this week. They should be. The multiple warheads on one new RS-28 missile could destroy Texas or France. Russia's new missiles and space gliders can outflank America's anti-missile radars in Alaska and Romania, rendering them as useless as France's Maginot Line.
War must never, ever be allowed to occur with Russia and China and the United States. Will we risk the life of the planet over a stupid quarrel over some one-tractor town in Ukraine or a Syrian village no one has ever heard of? Yes, if the neocons have their way.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.