June, 23 2009, 02:51pm EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Erin Robertson, Center for Native Ecosystems, (303) 546-0214 x 5
Duane Short, Biodiversity Conservation Alliance, (307) 742-7978
Dr. Sylvia Fallon, Natural Resources Defense Council, (202) 513-6246
Noah Greenwald, Center for Biological Diversity, (503) 484-7495
Jason Rylander, Staff Attorney, Defenders of Wildlife, (202) 772-3245
Suit Filed to Overturn Bush-Era Removal of Protections for Preble's Meadow Jumping Mouse in Wyoming
DENVER
Five conservation groups today challenged a Bush administration
decision to strip protections from endangered species. Under Bush's
leadership, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service was ordered to stop
protecting endangered plants and wildlife throughout their ranges, and
instead only protect the populations that were closest to extinction.
Under this controversial reinterpretation of the Endangered Species
Act, important habitat for endangered species recovery will not be
protected. The Bush-era interpretation has already denied protections
for several endangered species, and puts wildlife around the country at
risk. For now, conservation groups have focused their challenge on the
unwarranted loss of protections for the Preble's meadow jumping mouse.
On July 10, 2008, the Service removed protections for the Preble's
meadow jumping mouse in Wyoming while keeping the Colorado populations
on the endangered species list. Since August 11 of last year, Wyoming
Preble's meadow jumping mice have no protection.
Due
to habitat loss and the mouse's disappearance from much of the urban
corridor in Colorado and Wyoming, the Preble's mouse had been protected
as threatened under the Endangered Species Act since 1998.
"Endangered
species around the country are losing protections while this illegal
move by the Bush administration stands," said Erin Robertson, senior
staff biologist with Center for Native Ecosystems in Denver. "The fate
of the mouse is important, but there is much more at
stake."
The
removal of protections for Preble's in Wyoming is one of several
decisions issued by the Service since its March 2007 receipt of a memo
from the office of the solicitor proclaiming that the Endangered
Species Act allows the agency to neglect all but the most threatened
part of an endangered species' range. Similar "split decisions" have
failed to fully protect the gray wolf, Gunnison's prairie dog, and
Queen Charlotte goshawk.
The July decision was the
last in a string of Bush administration attempts to remove protections
for the jumping mouse. The Service had claimed in 2005 that the mouse
was not a valid subspecies and therefore did not warrant continued
protection. In 2006 an independent scientific panel concluded that the
Service had relied on contaminated data, and that the Preble's meadow
jumping mouse was unique and warranted protection under the Endangered
Species Act.
"The science is settled," said Dr.
Sylvia Fallon, staff scientist for the Natural Resources Defense
Council in Washington, D.C. "The mouse is unique and in trouble. Mice
don't read maps - it makes no sense for protections to end at the state
line for endangered species."
In 2007, under
pressure from Congress to account for politically motivated decisions
about endangered species, the Service admitted that the 2005 proposal
to remove protections for the mouse and much of its critical habitat
was instigated by political appointee Julie MacDonald. An earlier
Interior Department investigation had concluded that MacDonald
inappropriately overruled agency scientists' conclusions and
recommendations.
"The Obama administration needs
to reject this piecemeal approach to protection and salvage the
agency's scientific integrity," said Noah Greenwald, biodiversity
program director for the Tucson-based Center for Biological Diversity.
"Wyoming's mice are just as important for the species' survival as
those in Colorado."
"Our country's endangered
wildlife is suffering from these lingering abuses of the Bush
administration," said Jason Rylander, staff attorney for Defenders of
Wildlife. "It makes no sense for the protection of an imperiled animal
to depend on which side of the state line it lives."
Duane
Short, wild species program director for the Wyoming-based Biodiversity
Conservation Alliance, said: "Patchwork protection for this mouse or
any endangered species is akin to planned extinction by neglect. If we
fail to protect the jumping mouse populations in Wyoming, there will be
no hope of recolonizing Colorado habitats if those critically imperiled
populations die out."
The Preble's meadow jumping
mouse has large hind feet, long hind legs, and is capable of impressive
athletic feats. Using its long tail as a rudder, the mouse can launch
itself 18 inches into the air and switch direction mid-flight.
The
groups filing suit in Denver District Court today are Center for Native
Ecosystems (Denver), Biodiversity Conservation Alliance (Laramie),
Natural Resources Defense Council (New York), Center for Biological
Diversity (Tucson), and Defenders of Wildlife (Washington, D.C.). They
are being represented by Eric Glitzenstein of Meyer Glitzenstein &
Crystal and Mike Harris of the University of Denver Environmental Law
Clinic.
For a high-resolution image of the Preble's
meadow jumping mouse, the Service's decision, the memo from the office
of the solicitor, and other supporting materials, visit: https://nativeecosystems.org/species/mammals/prebles-meadow-jumping-mouse.
LATEST NEWS
House Democrat Calls GOP Budget a 'Blueprint for a Dystopian Hellscape'
Rep. Don Beyer warns the plan "would see unbridled benefits flowing to a wealthy and well-connected few while tens of millions of Americans lose healthcare, housing, retirement security, and food security."
Mar 27, 2024
As Republicans on Wednesday set their sights on a key seat opening up in the U.S. House of Representatives, the chamber's senior Democrat on the congressional Joint Economic Committee put out a blistering takedown of a top GOP budget proposal for the next fiscal year.
Congressman Don Beyer (D-Va.) took aim at the 180-page "Fiscal Sanity to Save America" plan released last week by the Republican Study Committee (RSC)—which includes about 80% of GOP House members—following proposals from Democratic President Joe Biden and House Budget Committee Chair Jodey Arrington (R-Texas).
"The Republican Study Committee budget is a blueprint for a dystopian hellscape," he warned. "The vision offered by this group, which counts 4 in 5 House Republicans as members, would see unbridled benefits flowing to a wealthy and well-connected few while tens of millions of Americans lose healthcare, housing, retirement security, and food security."
RSC proposals to "dramatically weaken healthcare," Beyer noted, include turning Medicare into a voucher plan and rolling back Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) provisions that cut costs for seniors; repealing tax subsidies for the Affordable Care Act and the law's protections for people with preexisting conditions; and transforming Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program into block grants to states.
As Common Dreams has reported, in addition to seeking cuts to Medicare and Social Security—while claiming to do nothing of the sort—the RSC has also launched a full-fledged assault on reproductive healthcare and rights, promoting 42 bills that would ban abortions after 15 weeks or even earlier, require unnecessary ultrasounds and 24-hour waiting periods, prohibit the use of fetal stem cells for research, and threaten access to in vitro fertilization, among other restrictions.
In addition to attacking reproductive freedom and key programs for seniors and low-income families, Beyer highlighted, the RSC wants to "weaken public health, public safety, and environmental protections," while "cutting taxes for the wealthy, by a lot."
The RSC advocates ending green tax credits from the IRA and Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act as well as slashing money for Community Oriented Policing Services and the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act. The committee also calls for permanently lowering taxes for the ultrarich, indexing capital gains taxes to inflation, repealing the estate tax, rolling back the IRA's corporate alternative minimum tax, and eliminating funding intended to help the Internal Revenue Service catch wealthy tax cheats.
"Democrats believe there is a better way to get our fiscal house in order without betraying our values," said Beyer. "That starts with making smart investments in our people and our future while demanding that the rich and large corporations pay their fair share in taxes. The contrast between the Democratic approach and this Republican budget could not possibly be clearer."
Biden's budget blueprint—released as he prepares for an electoral rematch against former Republican President Donald Trump, who infamously cut taxes for rich people and corporations—proposes a 25% minimum tax for individuals with wealth of more than $100 million, along with ending capital income tax breaks and closing other loopholes.
Polling results released Tuesday by Morning Consult show that a majority of voters across party lines in key swing states support raising taxes on people who make more than $400,000 per year.
Biden and the divided Congress this past weekend narrowly avoided a government shutdown by passing a long-delayed spending package. Fiscal year 2025 is set to begin in October, setting up another election-year fight over funding.
In what's been
dubbed the "Great Resignation," a growing number of House Republicans have announced that they are not seeking reelection or even exited their seats early—shrinking the party's already slim majority in the lower chamber.
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Troublemakers' Block Amazon HQ Over Plan to Link Data Centers With Gas Pipeline
"Amazon is breaking its Climate Pledge by powering new data centers with fracked gas," said one member of the new activist group. "So we came to demand that they honor the pledge."
Mar 27, 2024
A recently formed group of climate activists on Wednesday shut down entrances to Amazon's downtown Seattle headquarters to protest the tech titan's plans to link some of its data centers with an upgraded fracked gas pipeline.
Members of the Troublemakers—who describe themselves as "an ever-growing community of people who are committed to taking action for life on Earth"—blockaded the doors to the Day 1 Building on 7th Ave. in opposition to Amazon Web Services' (AWS) plan to connect three data centers near Boardman, Oregon to TC Energy's Gas Transmission Northwest (GTN) XPress Project.
As Common Dreamsreported last October, GTN XPress, which has been approved by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, would upgrade compressor stations in Kootenai County, Idaho; Sherman County, Oregon; and Walla Walla County, Washington. TC Energy plans to boost the 60-year-old pipeline's capacity by 150 million cubic feet of fracked gas by increasing the conduit's pressure.
"The decision to use fracked gas from the GTN XPress adds to Amazon's carbon emissions problems," the Troublemakers said in a statement. "Amazon's 2022 carbon emissions totaled 71.27 million metric tons, marking an 18% rise from 2020 and a 40% surge since 2019, the year Amazon unveiled its Climate Pledge. This alarming trend is in stark contrast to the global imperative to halve emissions by 2030."
The group wrote in a March 19 letter to Amazon CEO Andy Jassy:
Amazon prides itself on innovation. Using fossil fuel is not innovation... It is relying on a dying technology that is killing the planet. Utilizing GTN XPress would increase Amazon's carbon footprint and contribute greatly to climate change... We urge you to publicly commit to financing solar or wind projects to provide clean energy for Amazon's operations, and reject the GTN XPress.
The Troublemakers are calling on Amazon to:
- Publicly renounce the plan to connect to GTN XPress;
- Commit to not powering AWS data centers with fossil fuels; and
- Commit to using 100% renewable energy in each operation while funding wind and solar generation, storage, and distribution.
"We see Amazon's greenwashing every time we pass by Climate Pledge Arena," said Troublemaker Valerie Costa, who was referring to the home of the Seattle Kraken and Seattle Storm professional sports franchises. "Until Amazon drops its plan to buy fracked gas from GTN XPress, we'll keep showing up. Every fossil fuel project in the [Pacific Northwest] will be met with fierce resistance."
Leonard Sklar, a scientist and Troublemaker, asserted that "Amazon is breaking its Climate Pledge by powering new data centers with fracked gas. So we came to demand that they honor the pledge."
"We know they have the power to be 100% renewable energy," he added, "and that's what this moment requires."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Over Apple's Objections, Oregon Governor Signs Nation's Strongest Right to Repair Law
"Oregon becomes the first state to ban 'parts pairing,' which let companies like Apple decide when and how you replace parts."
Mar 27, 2024
In a move that advocates said will save Oregon residents money while supporting small businesses and reducing waste of electronic devices, Democratic Gov. Tina Kotek on Wednesday signed the Right to Repair Act, a law that passed earlier this month despite Apple's lobbying efforts.
The Public Interest Research Group (PIRG), applauded the signing of the bill, which requires manufacturers to provide Oregonians and small repair businesses with access to the parts, tools, and information needed to fix personal electronics and household appliances.
Manufacturers like Apple frequently require consumers to go to their stores or authorized service providers for repairs, making them expensive for customers and difficult to access for people who live far from the providers.
Charlie Fisher, state director of Oregon PIRG, said the law means Oregon is "moving forward on an innovation even more critical than a new gadget: the right to fix our electronic devices."
"By eliminating manufacturer restrictions, the right to repair will make it easier for Oregonians to keep their personal electronics running," said Fisher. "That will conserve precious natural resources and prevent waste. It's a refreshing alternative to a 'throwaway' system that treats everything as disposable."
The Right to Repair Act, which will go into effect on January 1, 2025, was supported by roughly 100 small businesses that provide repairs across the state, as well as recycling nonprofit organizations.
Apple testified against the bill, saying it opposed a provision against "parts pairing." The practice requires consumers or independent repair businesses to purchase parts from Apple and have them validated by the company.
John Perry, a senior security manager at Apple, told state senators that the provision would "undermine the security, safety, and privacy of Oregonians by forcing device manufacturers to allow the use of parts of unknown origin and consumer devices."
State Rep. Courtney Neron (D-26) cited a letter from the Federal Trade Commission when she told her colleagues that Apple's parts paring requirements "drive up the price that consumers must pay to fix a device and cause consumers to purchase a new device before the end of its useful life."
"Manufacturer repair restrictions also make it more challenging for small repair businesses to compete and contribute to unnecessary e-waste," she said.
Pro-labor media organization More Perfect Union called Kotek's signing of the bill "a major loss for Apple."
"Oregon has a proud history of passing forward thinking policies that help Oregonians steward and respect the resources that go into making the products we use everyday," said Celeste Meiffren-Swango, state director of Environment Oregon, "and we are building on that legacy with the Right to Repair Act."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular