SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Native American leaders hold signs against drilling in the Arctic Refuge on the 58th anniversary of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, during a press conference outside Washington, DC in 2018. The U.S. Department of Interior Monday announced it is moving forward with plans to lease land in the refuge for oil and gas drilling. (Photo: Saul Loeb/AFP via Getty Images)
Trump Administration Denounced for 'Foolish and Deeply Damaging' Plan to Drill in Arctic Wildlife Refuge
Local residents, who rely on caribou native to the refuge for sustenance, have called the area 'the heart and soul of mother earth.'
Aug 17, 2020
Environmental advocates vowed to sue the U.S. Department of Interior following its announcement Monday that the Trump administration has finalized plans to auction off oil and gas leasing rights in Alaska's Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.
"The door is being flung wide open for oil and gas drilling to impose irreversible harm to one of America's iconic spaces," Steve Blackledge, senior conservation program director for Environment America, said in a statement Monday. "Claims that this thoroughly invasive industrial work can be done in an environmentally responsible way are either naive or, even worse, cynically deceptive."
Blackledge called the Interior Department's plans for the refuge, also known as ANWR, "wrongheaded and tragic," and added: "We will turn to the courts to fight this foolish and deeply damaging effort because once drilling begins, there will be no way to return one of the world's great natural wonders to its former self."
Secretary of the Interior David Bernhardt pointed to congressional action in 2017 that set the stage for leasing in the refuge.
"Congress directed us to hold lease sales in the ANWR Coastal Plain, and we have taken a significant step in meeting our obligations by determining where and under what conditions the oil and gas development program will occur," he said in a statement."
Congress did approve the program as Bernhardt mentioned, and, in 2018, the Bureau of Land Management "concluded drilling could be conducted within the coastal plain area without harming wildlife," the New York Times reported.
Controversy over an area of about 1.6 million acres, known as 1002, located in the refuge, has existed since Congress established ANWR in 1980 and left open the possibility of drilling in the coastal plain. The refuge, which encompasses about 19 million acres, is home to wildlife including polar bears and caribou, among others. Local tribes, particularly the Gwich'in people native to the land there, rely on the caribou there for sustenance.
"That's the heart and soul of Mother Earth that's being messed with up there," Michael Peter a member of the Gwichyaa Zee Gwich'in Tribal Government told the BLM at a public forum held in Alaska in 2019.
Another Gwichyaa leader, Richard Carroll, noted at that same forum that the Gwich'in people were not being considered in the U.S. government's assessment of drilling in the refuge.
"It's going to set us back about 50 years, but that's another story," Carroll said. "Our nation is being run by profit-made corporations only. Human rights of the Gwich'in people have been totally ignored."
But politicians, including Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), are celebrating Monday's announcement and dismissing concerns that drilling may be unsafe.
"New opportunity in the 1002 Area is needed both now, as Alaskans navigate incredibly challenging times, and well into the future as we seek a lasting economic foundation for our state," Murkowski tweeted Monday.
But advocates say moving forward and opening the area to oil and gas exploration will only hurt the Gwich'in people and the wildlife that call the refuge home.
"The terrible plan for the Arctic Refuge could lead to destructive, widespread development on the sacred calving grounds of the Porcupine Caribou Herd," The Wilderness Society tweeted Monday. "The Gwich'in and Inupiat people who depend on the herd for their survival deserve better."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Environmental advocates vowed to sue the U.S. Department of Interior following its announcement Monday that the Trump administration has finalized plans to auction off oil and gas leasing rights in Alaska's Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.
"The door is being flung wide open for oil and gas drilling to impose irreversible harm to one of America's iconic spaces," Steve Blackledge, senior conservation program director for Environment America, said in a statement Monday. "Claims that this thoroughly invasive industrial work can be done in an environmentally responsible way are either naive or, even worse, cynically deceptive."
Blackledge called the Interior Department's plans for the refuge, also known as ANWR, "wrongheaded and tragic," and added: "We will turn to the courts to fight this foolish and deeply damaging effort because once drilling begins, there will be no way to return one of the world's great natural wonders to its former self."
Secretary of the Interior David Bernhardt pointed to congressional action in 2017 that set the stage for leasing in the refuge.
"Congress directed us to hold lease sales in the ANWR Coastal Plain, and we have taken a significant step in meeting our obligations by determining where and under what conditions the oil and gas development program will occur," he said in a statement."
Congress did approve the program as Bernhardt mentioned, and, in 2018, the Bureau of Land Management "concluded drilling could be conducted within the coastal plain area without harming wildlife," the New York Times reported.
Controversy over an area of about 1.6 million acres, known as 1002, located in the refuge, has existed since Congress established ANWR in 1980 and left open the possibility of drilling in the coastal plain. The refuge, which encompasses about 19 million acres, is home to wildlife including polar bears and caribou, among others. Local tribes, particularly the Gwich'in people native to the land there, rely on the caribou there for sustenance.
"That's the heart and soul of Mother Earth that's being messed with up there," Michael Peter a member of the Gwichyaa Zee Gwich'in Tribal Government told the BLM at a public forum held in Alaska in 2019.
Another Gwichyaa leader, Richard Carroll, noted at that same forum that the Gwich'in people were not being considered in the U.S. government's assessment of drilling in the refuge.
"It's going to set us back about 50 years, but that's another story," Carroll said. "Our nation is being run by profit-made corporations only. Human rights of the Gwich'in people have been totally ignored."
But politicians, including Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), are celebrating Monday's announcement and dismissing concerns that drilling may be unsafe.
"New opportunity in the 1002 Area is needed both now, as Alaskans navigate incredibly challenging times, and well into the future as we seek a lasting economic foundation for our state," Murkowski tweeted Monday.
But advocates say moving forward and opening the area to oil and gas exploration will only hurt the Gwich'in people and the wildlife that call the refuge home.
"The terrible plan for the Arctic Refuge could lead to destructive, widespread development on the sacred calving grounds of the Porcupine Caribou Herd," The Wilderness Society tweeted Monday. "The Gwich'in and Inupiat people who depend on the herd for their survival deserve better."
Environmental advocates vowed to sue the U.S. Department of Interior following its announcement Monday that the Trump administration has finalized plans to auction off oil and gas leasing rights in Alaska's Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.
"The door is being flung wide open for oil and gas drilling to impose irreversible harm to one of America's iconic spaces," Steve Blackledge, senior conservation program director for Environment America, said in a statement Monday. "Claims that this thoroughly invasive industrial work can be done in an environmentally responsible way are either naive or, even worse, cynically deceptive."
Blackledge called the Interior Department's plans for the refuge, also known as ANWR, "wrongheaded and tragic," and added: "We will turn to the courts to fight this foolish and deeply damaging effort because once drilling begins, there will be no way to return one of the world's great natural wonders to its former self."
Secretary of the Interior David Bernhardt pointed to congressional action in 2017 that set the stage for leasing in the refuge.
"Congress directed us to hold lease sales in the ANWR Coastal Plain, and we have taken a significant step in meeting our obligations by determining where and under what conditions the oil and gas development program will occur," he said in a statement."
Congress did approve the program as Bernhardt mentioned, and, in 2018, the Bureau of Land Management "concluded drilling could be conducted within the coastal plain area without harming wildlife," the New York Times reported.
Controversy over an area of about 1.6 million acres, known as 1002, located in the refuge, has existed since Congress established ANWR in 1980 and left open the possibility of drilling in the coastal plain. The refuge, which encompasses about 19 million acres, is home to wildlife including polar bears and caribou, among others. Local tribes, particularly the Gwich'in people native to the land there, rely on the caribou there for sustenance.
"That's the heart and soul of Mother Earth that's being messed with up there," Michael Peter a member of the Gwichyaa Zee Gwich'in Tribal Government told the BLM at a public forum held in Alaska in 2019.
Another Gwichyaa leader, Richard Carroll, noted at that same forum that the Gwich'in people were not being considered in the U.S. government's assessment of drilling in the refuge.
"It's going to set us back about 50 years, but that's another story," Carroll said. "Our nation is being run by profit-made corporations only. Human rights of the Gwich'in people have been totally ignored."
But politicians, including Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), are celebrating Monday's announcement and dismissing concerns that drilling may be unsafe.
"New opportunity in the 1002 Area is needed both now, as Alaskans navigate incredibly challenging times, and well into the future as we seek a lasting economic foundation for our state," Murkowski tweeted Monday.
But advocates say moving forward and opening the area to oil and gas exploration will only hurt the Gwich'in people and the wildlife that call the refuge home.
"The terrible plan for the Arctic Refuge could lead to destructive, widespread development on the sacred calving grounds of the Porcupine Caribou Herd," The Wilderness Society tweeted Monday. "The Gwich'in and Inupiat people who depend on the herd for their survival deserve better."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.