SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
On November 15, Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont and Rep. Ro Khanna of California introduced the "Stop Welfare for Any Large Monopoly Amassing Revenue from Taxpayers Act" (Stop Walmart Act). (Photo: Brennan Linsley/AP)
Corporations Should Share the Wealth Before Buying Back Stock
Senator Sanders has introduced a bill that would ban Walmart and other big corporations from repurchasing their stock unless they narrow the gaps between CEO and worker pay
Nov 16, 2018
These are good times for those at the top of the Walmart empire. Family members of the founders have seen their wealth grow about 10,000% since the 1980s. Today the Waltons are worth about $180 billion. And they own so much Walmart stock that four of them made $12.7 billion in just one day last year after a profit report bumped up their share price.
For Walmart CEO Doug McMillon, those strong profits turned into a $22 million paycheck.
But those at the top of the Walmart empire are not sharing the wealth. The CEO's pay was 1,188 times as much as the pay for a typical Walmart employee.
And even after the Republican tax "reform" that was supposed to be so great for workers, Walmart still refuses to pay a living wage. Instead, those tax cuts are making already rich CEOs and shareholders even richer.
How is this happening? Walmart and other big U.S. corporations are using huge chunks of their tax windfalls to buy back their own stock.
These buybacks have no redeeming social value. They simply artificially inflate a company's share price. That helps the rich who own the vast bulk of stock. At Walmart, the Walton family owns about half.
Buybacks also boost executive pay, since most of it is based on stock.
In other words, whenever companies go on a buyback spree, the rich just get richer.
Walmart announced plans in 2017 to spend $20 billion on stock buybacks over a two-year period. What if they spent some of those billions instead on worker pay? Berkeley researchers estimate it would cost Walmart less than $5 billion a year to raise its minimum wage to $15 an hour.
We should consider banning stock buybacks altogether, like they were until 1982. In the meantime, we should make sure companies can only repurchase their stock if they're sharing the wealth. This would be good for workers, good for business, and good for the broader economy.
On November 15, Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont and Rep. Ro Khanna of California introduced a bill that would do just that. Taunting the world's largest big box retailer, they called their bill the "Stop Welfare for Any Large Monopoly Amassing Revenue from Taxpayers Act" (Stop Walmart Act).
Specifically, the bill would prohibit large employers from buying back stock unless they:
- Pay all employees at least $15 an hour (Walmart's base wage is just $11);
- Allow employees to earn up to 7 days of paid sick leave; and
- Ensure that CEO compensation is not more than 150 times the company's median worker pay.
Sanders and Khanna are hoping to build on their recent success with a bill that helped shame Amazon into raising their base wage to $15. In that case, they shined a spotlight on the fact that a large number of the giant retailer's employees earn such low wages that they have to rely on public assistance.
The stock buyback angle is a new one for the legislators, but a hot issue at a time when so many U.S. corporations are using this legal form of stock manipulation to reward shareholders. According to Americans for Tax Fairness, corporations are spending 115 times as much of their tax windfalls on buybacks as on worker bonuses and raises.
How will Walmart respond to the public scrutiny generated by the Sanders-Khanna legislation? It's too early to tell. But with millions of consumers about to decide where to spend their holiday dollars, the timing could not be better.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
Sarah Anderson
Sarah Anderson directs the Global Economy Project of the Institute for Policy Studies, and is a co-editor of Inequality.org.
These are good times for those at the top of the Walmart empire. Family members of the founders have seen their wealth grow about 10,000% since the 1980s. Today the Waltons are worth about $180 billion. And they own so much Walmart stock that four of them made $12.7 billion in just one day last year after a profit report bumped up their share price.
For Walmart CEO Doug McMillon, those strong profits turned into a $22 million paycheck.
But those at the top of the Walmart empire are not sharing the wealth. The CEO's pay was 1,188 times as much as the pay for a typical Walmart employee.
And even after the Republican tax "reform" that was supposed to be so great for workers, Walmart still refuses to pay a living wage. Instead, those tax cuts are making already rich CEOs and shareholders even richer.
How is this happening? Walmart and other big U.S. corporations are using huge chunks of their tax windfalls to buy back their own stock.
These buybacks have no redeeming social value. They simply artificially inflate a company's share price. That helps the rich who own the vast bulk of stock. At Walmart, the Walton family owns about half.
Buybacks also boost executive pay, since most of it is based on stock.
In other words, whenever companies go on a buyback spree, the rich just get richer.
Walmart announced plans in 2017 to spend $20 billion on stock buybacks over a two-year period. What if they spent some of those billions instead on worker pay? Berkeley researchers estimate it would cost Walmart less than $5 billion a year to raise its minimum wage to $15 an hour.
We should consider banning stock buybacks altogether, like they were until 1982. In the meantime, we should make sure companies can only repurchase their stock if they're sharing the wealth. This would be good for workers, good for business, and good for the broader economy.
On November 15, Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont and Rep. Ro Khanna of California introduced a bill that would do just that. Taunting the world's largest big box retailer, they called their bill the "Stop Welfare for Any Large Monopoly Amassing Revenue from Taxpayers Act" (Stop Walmart Act).
Specifically, the bill would prohibit large employers from buying back stock unless they:
- Pay all employees at least $15 an hour (Walmart's base wage is just $11);
- Allow employees to earn up to 7 days of paid sick leave; and
- Ensure that CEO compensation is not more than 150 times the company's median worker pay.
Sanders and Khanna are hoping to build on their recent success with a bill that helped shame Amazon into raising their base wage to $15. In that case, they shined a spotlight on the fact that a large number of the giant retailer's employees earn such low wages that they have to rely on public assistance.
The stock buyback angle is a new one for the legislators, but a hot issue at a time when so many U.S. corporations are using this legal form of stock manipulation to reward shareholders. According to Americans for Tax Fairness, corporations are spending 115 times as much of their tax windfalls on buybacks as on worker bonuses and raises.
How will Walmart respond to the public scrutiny generated by the Sanders-Khanna legislation? It's too early to tell. But with millions of consumers about to decide where to spend their holiday dollars, the timing could not be better.
Sarah Anderson
Sarah Anderson directs the Global Economy Project of the Institute for Policy Studies, and is a co-editor of Inequality.org.
These are good times for those at the top of the Walmart empire. Family members of the founders have seen their wealth grow about 10,000% since the 1980s. Today the Waltons are worth about $180 billion. And they own so much Walmart stock that four of them made $12.7 billion in just one day last year after a profit report bumped up their share price.
For Walmart CEO Doug McMillon, those strong profits turned into a $22 million paycheck.
But those at the top of the Walmart empire are not sharing the wealth. The CEO's pay was 1,188 times as much as the pay for a typical Walmart employee.
And even after the Republican tax "reform" that was supposed to be so great for workers, Walmart still refuses to pay a living wage. Instead, those tax cuts are making already rich CEOs and shareholders even richer.
How is this happening? Walmart and other big U.S. corporations are using huge chunks of their tax windfalls to buy back their own stock.
These buybacks have no redeeming social value. They simply artificially inflate a company's share price. That helps the rich who own the vast bulk of stock. At Walmart, the Walton family owns about half.
Buybacks also boost executive pay, since most of it is based on stock.
In other words, whenever companies go on a buyback spree, the rich just get richer.
Walmart announced plans in 2017 to spend $20 billion on stock buybacks over a two-year period. What if they spent some of those billions instead on worker pay? Berkeley researchers estimate it would cost Walmart less than $5 billion a year to raise its minimum wage to $15 an hour.
We should consider banning stock buybacks altogether, like they were until 1982. In the meantime, we should make sure companies can only repurchase their stock if they're sharing the wealth. This would be good for workers, good for business, and good for the broader economy.
On November 15, Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont and Rep. Ro Khanna of California introduced a bill that would do just that. Taunting the world's largest big box retailer, they called their bill the "Stop Welfare for Any Large Monopoly Amassing Revenue from Taxpayers Act" (Stop Walmart Act).
Specifically, the bill would prohibit large employers from buying back stock unless they:
- Pay all employees at least $15 an hour (Walmart's base wage is just $11);
- Allow employees to earn up to 7 days of paid sick leave; and
- Ensure that CEO compensation is not more than 150 times the company's median worker pay.
Sanders and Khanna are hoping to build on their recent success with a bill that helped shame Amazon into raising their base wage to $15. In that case, they shined a spotlight on the fact that a large number of the giant retailer's employees earn such low wages that they have to rely on public assistance.
The stock buyback angle is a new one for the legislators, but a hot issue at a time when so many U.S. corporations are using this legal form of stock manipulation to reward shareholders. According to Americans for Tax Fairness, corporations are spending 115 times as much of their tax windfalls on buybacks as on worker bonuses and raises.
How will Walmart respond to the public scrutiny generated by the Sanders-Khanna legislation? It's too early to tell. But with millions of consumers about to decide where to spend their holiday dollars, the timing could not be better.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.