SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
New York state supporters of Sen. Bernie Sanders, pictured here at a rally in Queens last year, are angered over a decision to remove his name from the primary election ballot. (Photo: Ron Adar/SOPA Images/LightRocket/Getty Images)
'Democracy is Dead,' Declare Sanders Supporters After Bernie Taken Off New York Ballot
The decision was made by the New York Board of Elections, one of whom described holding the primary as a frivolous "beauty contest" for the Vermont lawmaker's supporters.
Apr 27, 2020
Supporters of Sen. Bernie Sanders were enraged on Monday after New York's Board of Elections voted to remove the Vermont lawmaker's name from the state's presidential primary ballot in the election scheduled for June--a move described by campaign advisor Jeff Weaver as "a blow to American democracy" that the Democratic National Committee should reverse.
"No one asked New York to cancel the election," Weaver said in a statement. "The DNC didn't request it. The Biden campaign didn't request it. And our campaign communicated that we wanted to remain on the ballot."
Weaver added that the move was part of a pattern on the part of New York to strip voting rights from its citizens and should be treated as such.
"New York has clearly violated its approved delegate selection plan," said Weaver. "If this is not remedied, New York should lose all its delegates to the 2020 Democratic National Convention and there should be a broader review by the Democratic Party of New York's checkered pattern of voter disenfranchisement."
As Common Dreams reported, Monday's decision to remove Sanders from the ballot was framed by board co-chair Douglas Kellner and commissioner Andrew Spano--the two Democratic officials on the board in charge of making the call--as a public health concern.
"What the Sanders supporters want is essentially a beauty contest that given the situation with the public health emergency that exists now seems to be unnecessary and indeed frivolous," Kellner said Monday during the board's meeting.
Progressives were quick to point out that the move is guaranteed to harm the prospects of insurgent Democratic candidates challenging established, more conservative incumbents.
"Strong suspicion that the cancellation of the Dem primary, while it has the side effect of harming this bid to get Bernie delegates to the convention, is really about protecting threatened Dem incumbents challenged from the left by giving voters less reason to turn out," tweeted journalist David Dayen.
Lindsey Boylan, who is running to replace Rep. Jerry Nadler in New York's 10th District, said the concerns over the disease appeared to her to be incredibly selective.
"None of this makes sense," Boylan tweeted.
Supporters of Sanders in New York, with the opportunity of voting for Sanders and adding to his delegate count and influence over the party platform taken away, were incensed.
Jewish Currents editor David Klion said the decision was part of a pattern of behavior from the party's establishment toward its left flank.
"Letting Bernie supporters mail in our ballots would be a cost-free way to make some of us feel the tiniest bit more at peace with the way things have worked out," Klion tweeted, "so of course Democrats instead have instead engineered a colossal wave of ill will toward the party and its nominee."
Brooklyn-based activist Linda Sarsour, meanwhile, was enraged.
"I am livid." said Sarsour. "Democracy is dead but my spirits won't be."
The bad will generated by the move, said Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), a prominent surrogate for Sanders during his now-suspended run for the White House, will ultimately backfire. Ocasio-Cortez tweeted that Democratic Party leadership need to understand that in order to reach the progressive wing of the party, "unity isn't a feeling, it's a process."
"Undemocratic, unilateral decisions that disenfranchise millions of progressive voters and volunteers is extremely destructive to the process of unifying the party for November," she continued. "Dems must take this seriously. This is the wrong call."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Supporters of Sen. Bernie Sanders were enraged on Monday after New York's Board of Elections voted to remove the Vermont lawmaker's name from the state's presidential primary ballot in the election scheduled for June--a move described by campaign advisor Jeff Weaver as "a blow to American democracy" that the Democratic National Committee should reverse.
"No one asked New York to cancel the election," Weaver said in a statement. "The DNC didn't request it. The Biden campaign didn't request it. And our campaign communicated that we wanted to remain on the ballot."
Weaver added that the move was part of a pattern on the part of New York to strip voting rights from its citizens and should be treated as such.
"New York has clearly violated its approved delegate selection plan," said Weaver. "If this is not remedied, New York should lose all its delegates to the 2020 Democratic National Convention and there should be a broader review by the Democratic Party of New York's checkered pattern of voter disenfranchisement."
As Common Dreams reported, Monday's decision to remove Sanders from the ballot was framed by board co-chair Douglas Kellner and commissioner Andrew Spano--the two Democratic officials on the board in charge of making the call--as a public health concern.
"What the Sanders supporters want is essentially a beauty contest that given the situation with the public health emergency that exists now seems to be unnecessary and indeed frivolous," Kellner said Monday during the board's meeting.
Progressives were quick to point out that the move is guaranteed to harm the prospects of insurgent Democratic candidates challenging established, more conservative incumbents.
"Strong suspicion that the cancellation of the Dem primary, while it has the side effect of harming this bid to get Bernie delegates to the convention, is really about protecting threatened Dem incumbents challenged from the left by giving voters less reason to turn out," tweeted journalist David Dayen.
Lindsey Boylan, who is running to replace Rep. Jerry Nadler in New York's 10th District, said the concerns over the disease appeared to her to be incredibly selective.
"None of this makes sense," Boylan tweeted.
Supporters of Sanders in New York, with the opportunity of voting for Sanders and adding to his delegate count and influence over the party platform taken away, were incensed.
Jewish Currents editor David Klion said the decision was part of a pattern of behavior from the party's establishment toward its left flank.
"Letting Bernie supporters mail in our ballots would be a cost-free way to make some of us feel the tiniest bit more at peace with the way things have worked out," Klion tweeted, "so of course Democrats instead have instead engineered a colossal wave of ill will toward the party and its nominee."
Brooklyn-based activist Linda Sarsour, meanwhile, was enraged.
"I am livid." said Sarsour. "Democracy is dead but my spirits won't be."
The bad will generated by the move, said Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), a prominent surrogate for Sanders during his now-suspended run for the White House, will ultimately backfire. Ocasio-Cortez tweeted that Democratic Party leadership need to understand that in order to reach the progressive wing of the party, "unity isn't a feeling, it's a process."
"Undemocratic, unilateral decisions that disenfranchise millions of progressive voters and volunteers is extremely destructive to the process of unifying the party for November," she continued. "Dems must take this seriously. This is the wrong call."
Supporters of Sen. Bernie Sanders were enraged on Monday after New York's Board of Elections voted to remove the Vermont lawmaker's name from the state's presidential primary ballot in the election scheduled for June--a move described by campaign advisor Jeff Weaver as "a blow to American democracy" that the Democratic National Committee should reverse.
"No one asked New York to cancel the election," Weaver said in a statement. "The DNC didn't request it. The Biden campaign didn't request it. And our campaign communicated that we wanted to remain on the ballot."
Weaver added that the move was part of a pattern on the part of New York to strip voting rights from its citizens and should be treated as such.
"New York has clearly violated its approved delegate selection plan," said Weaver. "If this is not remedied, New York should lose all its delegates to the 2020 Democratic National Convention and there should be a broader review by the Democratic Party of New York's checkered pattern of voter disenfranchisement."
As Common Dreams reported, Monday's decision to remove Sanders from the ballot was framed by board co-chair Douglas Kellner and commissioner Andrew Spano--the two Democratic officials on the board in charge of making the call--as a public health concern.
"What the Sanders supporters want is essentially a beauty contest that given the situation with the public health emergency that exists now seems to be unnecessary and indeed frivolous," Kellner said Monday during the board's meeting.
Progressives were quick to point out that the move is guaranteed to harm the prospects of insurgent Democratic candidates challenging established, more conservative incumbents.
"Strong suspicion that the cancellation of the Dem primary, while it has the side effect of harming this bid to get Bernie delegates to the convention, is really about protecting threatened Dem incumbents challenged from the left by giving voters less reason to turn out," tweeted journalist David Dayen.
Lindsey Boylan, who is running to replace Rep. Jerry Nadler in New York's 10th District, said the concerns over the disease appeared to her to be incredibly selective.
"None of this makes sense," Boylan tweeted.
Supporters of Sanders in New York, with the opportunity of voting for Sanders and adding to his delegate count and influence over the party platform taken away, were incensed.
Jewish Currents editor David Klion said the decision was part of a pattern of behavior from the party's establishment toward its left flank.
"Letting Bernie supporters mail in our ballots would be a cost-free way to make some of us feel the tiniest bit more at peace with the way things have worked out," Klion tweeted, "so of course Democrats instead have instead engineered a colossal wave of ill will toward the party and its nominee."
Brooklyn-based activist Linda Sarsour, meanwhile, was enraged.
"I am livid." said Sarsour. "Democracy is dead but my spirits won't be."
The bad will generated by the move, said Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), a prominent surrogate for Sanders during his now-suspended run for the White House, will ultimately backfire. Ocasio-Cortez tweeted that Democratic Party leadership need to understand that in order to reach the progressive wing of the party, "unity isn't a feeling, it's a process."
"Undemocratic, unilateral decisions that disenfranchise millions of progressive voters and volunteers is extremely destructive to the process of unifying the party for November," she continued. "Dems must take this seriously. This is the wrong call."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.