

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled on Tuesday to uphold the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's ability to curb greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act, rejecting challenges by polluting industries.
The court found that the EPA was "unambiguously correct" in using its regulation to address global warming.
Environmental groups have applauded the ruling as a landmark win for clean air and the climate.
Earthjustice attorney and co-counsel for Environmental Defense Fund Howard Fox stated, "Polluting industries such as big coal and big oil oppose action to limit climate change, refusing to modernize and resisting newer technologies. This case underscores these industries' dogged resistance to safeguards designed to protect the public's health and the environment. Notably, the automobile industry did not join these misguided challenges, but instead opposed these big industrial polluters' efforts to overturn the standards that apply to cars."
Kassie Siegel, director of the Center for Biological Diversity's Climate Law Institute, reacted to the decision saying, "Now that the D.C. Circuit has affirmed the reality of the climate crisis and EPA's duty and ability to address the problem, it's time for the agency to aggressively combat the most serious social and environmental threat of our age. All parties need to put politics aside right away and work toward the solutions that are so readily available -- because the moral case for action could not be stronger."
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled on Tuesday to uphold the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's ability to curb greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act, rejecting challenges by polluting industries.
The court found that the EPA was "unambiguously correct" in using its regulation to address global warming.
Environmental groups have applauded the ruling as a landmark win for clean air and the climate.
Earthjustice attorney and co-counsel for Environmental Defense Fund Howard Fox stated, "Polluting industries such as big coal and big oil oppose action to limit climate change, refusing to modernize and resisting newer technologies. This case underscores these industries' dogged resistance to safeguards designed to protect the public's health and the environment. Notably, the automobile industry did not join these misguided challenges, but instead opposed these big industrial polluters' efforts to overturn the standards that apply to cars."
Kassie Siegel, director of the Center for Biological Diversity's Climate Law Institute, reacted to the decision saying, "Now that the D.C. Circuit has affirmed the reality of the climate crisis and EPA's duty and ability to address the problem, it's time for the agency to aggressively combat the most serious social and environmental threat of our age. All parties need to put politics aside right away and work toward the solutions that are so readily available -- because the moral case for action could not be stronger."
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled on Tuesday to uphold the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's ability to curb greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act, rejecting challenges by polluting industries.
The court found that the EPA was "unambiguously correct" in using its regulation to address global warming.
Environmental groups have applauded the ruling as a landmark win for clean air and the climate.
Earthjustice attorney and co-counsel for Environmental Defense Fund Howard Fox stated, "Polluting industries such as big coal and big oil oppose action to limit climate change, refusing to modernize and resisting newer technologies. This case underscores these industries' dogged resistance to safeguards designed to protect the public's health and the environment. Notably, the automobile industry did not join these misguided challenges, but instead opposed these big industrial polluters' efforts to overturn the standards that apply to cars."
Kassie Siegel, director of the Center for Biological Diversity's Climate Law Institute, reacted to the decision saying, "Now that the D.C. Circuit has affirmed the reality of the climate crisis and EPA's duty and ability to address the problem, it's time for the agency to aggressively combat the most serious social and environmental threat of our age. All parties need to put politics aside right away and work toward the solutions that are so readily available -- because the moral case for action could not be stronger."