Obama with His Foot in the Air
Two things bother me about Obama's press conference performance on Tuesday.
And they concern two big issues: health care and the economy.
He's backsliding on both.
On health care, he was pressed by reporters who followed up on each others' questions-a good, new journalistic skill that evidently fell from the sky after Bush left office.
What they were pressing him on was whether his public option for health care was non-negotiable.
After hedging, he basically said no. "We have not drawn lines in the sand," he said, "other than that reform has to control costs and that it has to provide relief to people who don't have health insurance or are underinsured."
What a concession! A public plan is the best way to provide that relief, and 72 percent of the public says it wants a public option. But Obama seems prepared to sell them down the river.
On the economy, when asked directly whether he thinks we "need a second stimulus package" since unemployment is likely to top 10 percent soon, he said, nonchalantly, "Well, not yet."
What's he waiting for?
The rate to hit 10.5 percent? 11 percent? 12 percent?
He even said when he was drawing up the first stimulus plan that "nobody understood what the depths of this recession were going to look like."
Well, that's not true. A lot of good, progressive economists did, like Paul Krugman, Joseph Stiglitz, and Dean Baker. They predicted unemployment above 10 percent. That's why they pushed for a stimulus that was twice as big as the one Obama settled for.
It's disingenuous for Obama to hide behind the Condoleezza Rice construct that "nobody" could have imagined what then happened.
And it's deeply troubling to see Obama acting so timorously on the major issues that he himself has identified.
I keep waiting for him to go to the mat on something, to put his foot down, and say, I'm not going to stand for higher unemployment so we must pass another stimulus bill, or I'm not going to sign a health care reform bill that doesn't have a public option.
But never puts his foot down. It's always in the air.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Two things bother me about Obama's press conference performance on Tuesday.
And they concern two big issues: health care and the economy.
He's backsliding on both.
On health care, he was pressed by reporters who followed up on each others' questions-a good, new journalistic skill that evidently fell from the sky after Bush left office.
What they were pressing him on was whether his public option for health care was non-negotiable.
After hedging, he basically said no. "We have not drawn lines in the sand," he said, "other than that reform has to control costs and that it has to provide relief to people who don't have health insurance or are underinsured."
What a concession! A public plan is the best way to provide that relief, and 72 percent of the public says it wants a public option. But Obama seems prepared to sell them down the river.
On the economy, when asked directly whether he thinks we "need a second stimulus package" since unemployment is likely to top 10 percent soon, he said, nonchalantly, "Well, not yet."
What's he waiting for?
The rate to hit 10.5 percent? 11 percent? 12 percent?
He even said when he was drawing up the first stimulus plan that "nobody understood what the depths of this recession were going to look like."
Well, that's not true. A lot of good, progressive economists did, like Paul Krugman, Joseph Stiglitz, and Dean Baker. They predicted unemployment above 10 percent. That's why they pushed for a stimulus that was twice as big as the one Obama settled for.
It's disingenuous for Obama to hide behind the Condoleezza Rice construct that "nobody" could have imagined what then happened.
And it's deeply troubling to see Obama acting so timorously on the major issues that he himself has identified.
I keep waiting for him to go to the mat on something, to put his foot down, and say, I'm not going to stand for higher unemployment so we must pass another stimulus bill, or I'm not going to sign a health care reform bill that doesn't have a public option.
But never puts his foot down. It's always in the air.
Two things bother me about Obama's press conference performance on Tuesday.
And they concern two big issues: health care and the economy.
He's backsliding on both.
On health care, he was pressed by reporters who followed up on each others' questions-a good, new journalistic skill that evidently fell from the sky after Bush left office.
What they were pressing him on was whether his public option for health care was non-negotiable.
After hedging, he basically said no. "We have not drawn lines in the sand," he said, "other than that reform has to control costs and that it has to provide relief to people who don't have health insurance or are underinsured."
What a concession! A public plan is the best way to provide that relief, and 72 percent of the public says it wants a public option. But Obama seems prepared to sell them down the river.
On the economy, when asked directly whether he thinks we "need a second stimulus package" since unemployment is likely to top 10 percent soon, he said, nonchalantly, "Well, not yet."
What's he waiting for?
The rate to hit 10.5 percent? 11 percent? 12 percent?
He even said when he was drawing up the first stimulus plan that "nobody understood what the depths of this recession were going to look like."
Well, that's not true. A lot of good, progressive economists did, like Paul Krugman, Joseph Stiglitz, and Dean Baker. They predicted unemployment above 10 percent. That's why they pushed for a stimulus that was twice as big as the one Obama settled for.
It's disingenuous for Obama to hide behind the Condoleezza Rice construct that "nobody" could have imagined what then happened.
And it's deeply troubling to see Obama acting so timorously on the major issues that he himself has identified.
I keep waiting for him to go to the mat on something, to put his foot down, and say, I'm not going to stand for higher unemployment so we must pass another stimulus bill, or I'm not going to sign a health care reform bill that doesn't have a public option.
But never puts his foot down. It's always in the air.