Former U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during a campaign rally in support of Republicans Doug Mastriano for governor of Pennsylvania and Mehmet Oz for U.S. Senate at Mohegan Sun Arena in Wilkes-Barre on September 3, 2022. (Photo: Ed Jones/AFP via Getty Images)
House Passes Bill That Would Thwart Trump Plot to Purge Federal Workers
"The former president's attempt to remove qualified experts and replace them with political loyalists threatened our national security and our government's ability to function the way the American people expect it to," said Rep. Gerry Connolly, the bill's sponsor.
U.S. House Democrats and a handful of Republicans on Thursday rejected former President Donald Trump's plot to oust civil servants by passing the Preventing a Patronage System Act.
"The civil servants who make up our federal workforce are the engine that keeps our federal government running," said Rep. Gerry Connolly (D-Va.), the bill's sponsor. "We rely on their experience and expertise to provide every basic government service--from delivering the mail to helping families in the wake of natural disasters."
"The former president's attempt to remove qualified experts and replace them with political loyalists threatened our national security and our government's ability to function the way the American people expect it to. Expertise, not fealty, must define our civil service," he added.
Connolly, who chairs the House Committee on Oversight and Reform's government operations panel, and Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick (R-Penn.) introduced H.R. 302 in response to Trump's executive order to establish a new Schedule F category of federal employees who are easier to fire.
Although President Joe Biden rescinded the order, Trump is widely expected to seek office again in 2024, and even if he isn't the next Republican presidential nominee, as Common Dreams has reported, other potential candidates have signaled support for the scheme.
In July, U.S. Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas) introduced the Public Service Reform Act, which one policy expert said makes clear that "efforts to try to change the civil service aren't just Trump necessarily, and if Republicans take control of Congress following the midterms, this may very well go from idea to specific action."
As Connolly's office previously outlined:
The Preventing a Patronage System Act would secure the civil service and protect federal employees from losing statutory job protections and due process rights. Specifically, the bill would prevent any position in the competitive service from being reclassified to an excepted service schedule created after September 30, 2020. The bill would also limit federal employee reclassifications to the five excepted service schedules in use prior to fiscal year 2021 and would block any reclassifications of federal employees to Schedule F pursuant to the E.O. signed on October 21, 2020.
Government Executive noted Thursday that the 225-204 vote--with three members not voting--came after the bill "passed out of the House as part of the chamber's version of the fiscal 2023 National Defense Authorization Act in July, and companion legislation was introduced in the Senate last month."
"The renewed focus on the issue by congressional Democrats comes after reports that conservative activists and ex-Trump administration staffers have plans to immediately revive Schedule F under the next Republican president and have already identified 50,000 employees to threaten with termination," the outlet added. "Trump, who is mulling another run at the White House, also explicitly endorsed the idea during a political rally last month."
Critics have condemned the GOP effort as "authoritarianism 101" and "a fascist takeover of our government." One public policy expert warned this year that "it would be a government of the lawless leading the incompetent."
House Democrats shared similar statements leading up to the vote Thursday.
In a tweet affirming his support for the bill, Rep. Mike Quigley (D-Ill.) told Americans that "you deserve a government made up of public servants, not political hacks."
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. In a few short weeks, US voters will have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. Our Fall Campaign is underway, and we need your help. To power our newsroom through the rest of the year, we need to raise $125,000 by midnight on October 31. So if you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
U.S. House Democrats and a handful of Republicans on Thursday rejected former President Donald Trump's plot to oust civil servants by passing the Preventing a Patronage System Act.
"The civil servants who make up our federal workforce are the engine that keeps our federal government running," said Rep. Gerry Connolly (D-Va.), the bill's sponsor. "We rely on their experience and expertise to provide every basic government service--from delivering the mail to helping families in the wake of natural disasters."
"The former president's attempt to remove qualified experts and replace them with political loyalists threatened our national security and our government's ability to function the way the American people expect it to. Expertise, not fealty, must define our civil service," he added.
Connolly, who chairs the House Committee on Oversight and Reform's government operations panel, and Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick (R-Penn.) introduced H.R. 302 in response to Trump's executive order to establish a new Schedule F category of federal employees who are easier to fire.
Although President Joe Biden rescinded the order, Trump is widely expected to seek office again in 2024, and even if he isn't the next Republican presidential nominee, as Common Dreams has reported, other potential candidates have signaled support for the scheme.
In July, U.S. Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas) introduced the Public Service Reform Act, which one policy expert said makes clear that "efforts to try to change the civil service aren't just Trump necessarily, and if Republicans take control of Congress following the midterms, this may very well go from idea to specific action."
As Connolly's office previously outlined:
The Preventing a Patronage System Act would secure the civil service and protect federal employees from losing statutory job protections and due process rights. Specifically, the bill would prevent any position in the competitive service from being reclassified to an excepted service schedule created after September 30, 2020. The bill would also limit federal employee reclassifications to the five excepted service schedules in use prior to fiscal year 2021 and would block any reclassifications of federal employees to Schedule F pursuant to the E.O. signed on October 21, 2020.
Government Executive noted Thursday that the 225-204 vote--with three members not voting--came after the bill "passed out of the House as part of the chamber's version of the fiscal 2023 National Defense Authorization Act in July, and companion legislation was introduced in the Senate last month."
"The renewed focus on the issue by congressional Democrats comes after reports that conservative activists and ex-Trump administration staffers have plans to immediately revive Schedule F under the next Republican president and have already identified 50,000 employees to threaten with termination," the outlet added. "Trump, who is mulling another run at the White House, also explicitly endorsed the idea during a political rally last month."
Critics have condemned the GOP effort as "authoritarianism 101" and "a fascist takeover of our government." One public policy expert warned this year that "it would be a government of the lawless leading the incompetent."
House Democrats shared similar statements leading up to the vote Thursday.
In a tweet affirming his support for the bill, Rep. Mike Quigley (D-Ill.) told Americans that "you deserve a government made up of public servants, not political hacks."
U.S. House Democrats and a handful of Republicans on Thursday rejected former President Donald Trump's plot to oust civil servants by passing the Preventing a Patronage System Act.
"The civil servants who make up our federal workforce are the engine that keeps our federal government running," said Rep. Gerry Connolly (D-Va.), the bill's sponsor. "We rely on their experience and expertise to provide every basic government service--from delivering the mail to helping families in the wake of natural disasters."
"The former president's attempt to remove qualified experts and replace them with political loyalists threatened our national security and our government's ability to function the way the American people expect it to. Expertise, not fealty, must define our civil service," he added.
Connolly, who chairs the House Committee on Oversight and Reform's government operations panel, and Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick (R-Penn.) introduced H.R. 302 in response to Trump's executive order to establish a new Schedule F category of federal employees who are easier to fire.
Although President Joe Biden rescinded the order, Trump is widely expected to seek office again in 2024, and even if he isn't the next Republican presidential nominee, as Common Dreams has reported, other potential candidates have signaled support for the scheme.
In July, U.S. Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas) introduced the Public Service Reform Act, which one policy expert said makes clear that "efforts to try to change the civil service aren't just Trump necessarily, and if Republicans take control of Congress following the midterms, this may very well go from idea to specific action."
As Connolly's office previously outlined:
The Preventing a Patronage System Act would secure the civil service and protect federal employees from losing statutory job protections and due process rights. Specifically, the bill would prevent any position in the competitive service from being reclassified to an excepted service schedule created after September 30, 2020. The bill would also limit federal employee reclassifications to the five excepted service schedules in use prior to fiscal year 2021 and would block any reclassifications of federal employees to Schedule F pursuant to the E.O. signed on October 21, 2020.
Government Executive noted Thursday that the 225-204 vote--with three members not voting--came after the bill "passed out of the House as part of the chamber's version of the fiscal 2023 National Defense Authorization Act in July, and companion legislation was introduced in the Senate last month."
"The renewed focus on the issue by congressional Democrats comes after reports that conservative activists and ex-Trump administration staffers have plans to immediately revive Schedule F under the next Republican president and have already identified 50,000 employees to threaten with termination," the outlet added. "Trump, who is mulling another run at the White House, also explicitly endorsed the idea during a political rally last month."
Critics have condemned the GOP effort as "authoritarianism 101" and "a fascist takeover of our government." One public policy expert warned this year that "it would be a government of the lawless leading the incompetent."
House Democrats shared similar statements leading up to the vote Thursday.
In a tweet affirming his support for the bill, Rep. Mike Quigley (D-Ill.) told Americans that "you deserve a government made up of public servants, not political hacks."