SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Photo: Steve Rhodes
A proposal for supplemental war funding was under scrutiny Wednesday at a Congressional hearing, where Defense Department officials hinted that there is no end in sight to the need for this counterterrorism "war chest."
At issue is nearly $60 billion proposed last month by the White House for Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO) funds for the 2015 budget. The pot for OCO, which until 2009 was called Global War on Terrorism, is on top of the base budget for the Defense Department, which for the 2015 proposal is nearly $500 billion.
Mattea Kramer of the National Priorities Project has pointed out that the OCO budget "isn't subject to caps or cuts or any restrictions at all." This has led some, like Stephen Miles, coalition coordinator for Win Without War, to refer to it as "a massive slush fund to avoid fiscal discipline."
The House Armed Services Committee (HASC) held a hearing on the OCO funding proposal on Wednesday.
HASC Chairman "Buck" McKeon told Politico's Morning Defense that the need for the OCO funds extends beyond Afghanistan:
"I think there's going to be an ongoing need for OCO," he told [Morning D], saying the fund will be necessary as long as the military is carrying out counterterrorism operations around the world.
Adm. Sandy Winnefeld, vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, made similar comments at the hearing Wednesday. Stars and Stripes reported:
Winnefeld said the supplemental funding pot... could be expanding even further and used for anything the military "would not normally be doing in a peaceful world." [...]
[T]he OCO war chest could be tapped whenever the U.S. needs to launch operations to fight threats or stamp out violence around the globe, Winnefeld said.
And, according to a statement released by the Defense Department, Winnefeld said that "readiness, unanticipated contingency operations and indirect support missions continue globally."
Deputy Defense Secretary Bob Work also said at the hearing that in addition to funding ongoing operations in Afghanistan, the funds would support new, multinational counterterrorism operations.
The House Committee on Appropriations also held a closed hearing on OCO funds Tuesday, while the House Budge Committee will hold its hearing on the funding Thursday.
_________________________
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
A proposal for supplemental war funding was under scrutiny Wednesday at a Congressional hearing, where Defense Department officials hinted that there is no end in sight to the need for this counterterrorism "war chest."
At issue is nearly $60 billion proposed last month by the White House for Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO) funds for the 2015 budget. The pot for OCO, which until 2009 was called Global War on Terrorism, is on top of the base budget for the Defense Department, which for the 2015 proposal is nearly $500 billion.
Mattea Kramer of the National Priorities Project has pointed out that the OCO budget "isn't subject to caps or cuts or any restrictions at all." This has led some, like Stephen Miles, coalition coordinator for Win Without War, to refer to it as "a massive slush fund to avoid fiscal discipline."
The House Armed Services Committee (HASC) held a hearing on the OCO funding proposal on Wednesday.
HASC Chairman "Buck" McKeon told Politico's Morning Defense that the need for the OCO funds extends beyond Afghanistan:
"I think there's going to be an ongoing need for OCO," he told [Morning D], saying the fund will be necessary as long as the military is carrying out counterterrorism operations around the world.
Adm. Sandy Winnefeld, vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, made similar comments at the hearing Wednesday. Stars and Stripes reported:
Winnefeld said the supplemental funding pot... could be expanding even further and used for anything the military "would not normally be doing in a peaceful world." [...]
[T]he OCO war chest could be tapped whenever the U.S. needs to launch operations to fight threats or stamp out violence around the globe, Winnefeld said.
And, according to a statement released by the Defense Department, Winnefeld said that "readiness, unanticipated contingency operations and indirect support missions continue globally."
Deputy Defense Secretary Bob Work also said at the hearing that in addition to funding ongoing operations in Afghanistan, the funds would support new, multinational counterterrorism operations.
The House Committee on Appropriations also held a closed hearing on OCO funds Tuesday, while the House Budge Committee will hold its hearing on the funding Thursday.
_________________________
A proposal for supplemental war funding was under scrutiny Wednesday at a Congressional hearing, where Defense Department officials hinted that there is no end in sight to the need for this counterterrorism "war chest."
At issue is nearly $60 billion proposed last month by the White House for Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO) funds for the 2015 budget. The pot for OCO, which until 2009 was called Global War on Terrorism, is on top of the base budget for the Defense Department, which for the 2015 proposal is nearly $500 billion.
Mattea Kramer of the National Priorities Project has pointed out that the OCO budget "isn't subject to caps or cuts or any restrictions at all." This has led some, like Stephen Miles, coalition coordinator for Win Without War, to refer to it as "a massive slush fund to avoid fiscal discipline."
The House Armed Services Committee (HASC) held a hearing on the OCO funding proposal on Wednesday.
HASC Chairman "Buck" McKeon told Politico's Morning Defense that the need for the OCO funds extends beyond Afghanistan:
"I think there's going to be an ongoing need for OCO," he told [Morning D], saying the fund will be necessary as long as the military is carrying out counterterrorism operations around the world.
Adm. Sandy Winnefeld, vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, made similar comments at the hearing Wednesday. Stars and Stripes reported:
Winnefeld said the supplemental funding pot... could be expanding even further and used for anything the military "would not normally be doing in a peaceful world." [...]
[T]he OCO war chest could be tapped whenever the U.S. needs to launch operations to fight threats or stamp out violence around the globe, Winnefeld said.
And, according to a statement released by the Defense Department, Winnefeld said that "readiness, unanticipated contingency operations and indirect support missions continue globally."
Deputy Defense Secretary Bob Work also said at the hearing that in addition to funding ongoing operations in Afghanistan, the funds would support new, multinational counterterrorism operations.
The House Committee on Appropriations also held a closed hearing on OCO funds Tuesday, while the House Budge Committee will hold its hearing on the funding Thursday.
_________________________