SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Why ABC Thought Suffering Palestinians Were Israelis
On July 8, ABC World News anchor Diane Sawyer gave viewers the latest on the violence in the Gaza Strip-by stressing the threat to Israel:
We take you overseas now to the rockets raining down on Israel.... And here an Israeli family trying to salvage what they can, one woman standing speechless among the ruins.
Jul 10, 2014
On July 8, ABC World News anchor Diane Sawyer gave viewers the latest on the violence in the Gaza Strip-by stressing the threat to Israel:
We take you overseas now to the rockets raining down on Israel.... And here an Israeli family trying to salvage what they can, one woman standing speechless among the ruins.
Sawyer's narration accompanied these images:
One problem: Neither of those images is an "Israeli family." Both photos are from the Gaza Strip, and capture the aftermath of Israeli attacks.
I pointed this out to ABC World News on Twitter yesterday:
Thankfully, many others caught the same newscast, including Yousef Munayyer of the Palestine Center, which posted a video of ABC's embarrassing mistake. Journalist Rania Khalek wrote a piece for the Electronic Intifada (7/9/14) as well.
Finally, ABC posted this statement (7/10/14) early this morning:
So an honest mistake, right? That's one way of looking at it.
But there's a pretty well-established pattern of corporate media trying to paint the conflict as between equals, a type of false balance that treats the threats to Israeli lives and Palestinians lives as similar. But at times it's much more than that; this ABC report, and others like it, foreground the fear that Israelis are dealing with as sirens warn of incoming rockets from Gaza. "Running in terror as sirens wail" is how ABC correspondent Alex Marquardt began the segment right after Sawyer's introduction. He conveyed Israel's view of the conflict before shifting to life in Gaza.
At this point, the rockets targeting Israel have done very little damage. There are no reported Israeli deaths. But the fact that dozens of Palestinians had died, including several children, by the time ABC aired its report apparently did not cause them to consider this more newsworthy than Israeli fear.
The rocket attacks on Israel are treated as being more fundamentally important than the attacks being launched on Gaza. Sawyer's introduction at the top of the broadcast was this: "On the brink: Rockets raining down on Israel. The Israelis trying to blast them out of the sky. And our reporter is there on the front lines."
With that kind of set up, a newscast is bound to believe that the destruction they're showing viewers must be in Israel-even though anyone who's actually followed this story would know that the images show a level of destruction that is only happening in Gaza.
That's why ABC's error should be seen less as a simple mistake, and more as a reflection of a worldview.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
© 2023 Fairness and Accuracy In Reporting (FAIR)
Peter Hart
Peter Hart is the Domestic Communications Director at the Center for Economic and Policy Research.
On July 8, ABC World News anchor Diane Sawyer gave viewers the latest on the violence in the Gaza Strip-by stressing the threat to Israel:
We take you overseas now to the rockets raining down on Israel.... And here an Israeli family trying to salvage what they can, one woman standing speechless among the ruins.
Sawyer's narration accompanied these images:
One problem: Neither of those images is an "Israeli family." Both photos are from the Gaza Strip, and capture the aftermath of Israeli attacks.
I pointed this out to ABC World News on Twitter yesterday:
Thankfully, many others caught the same newscast, including Yousef Munayyer of the Palestine Center, which posted a video of ABC's embarrassing mistake. Journalist Rania Khalek wrote a piece for the Electronic Intifada (7/9/14) as well.
Finally, ABC posted this statement (7/10/14) early this morning:
So an honest mistake, right? That's one way of looking at it.
But there's a pretty well-established pattern of corporate media trying to paint the conflict as between equals, a type of false balance that treats the threats to Israeli lives and Palestinians lives as similar. But at times it's much more than that; this ABC report, and others like it, foreground the fear that Israelis are dealing with as sirens warn of incoming rockets from Gaza. "Running in terror as sirens wail" is how ABC correspondent Alex Marquardt began the segment right after Sawyer's introduction. He conveyed Israel's view of the conflict before shifting to life in Gaza.
At this point, the rockets targeting Israel have done very little damage. There are no reported Israeli deaths. But the fact that dozens of Palestinians had died, including several children, by the time ABC aired its report apparently did not cause them to consider this more newsworthy than Israeli fear.
The rocket attacks on Israel are treated as being more fundamentally important than the attacks being launched on Gaza. Sawyer's introduction at the top of the broadcast was this: "On the brink: Rockets raining down on Israel. The Israelis trying to blast them out of the sky. And our reporter is there on the front lines."
With that kind of set up, a newscast is bound to believe that the destruction they're showing viewers must be in Israel-even though anyone who's actually followed this story would know that the images show a level of destruction that is only happening in Gaza.
That's why ABC's error should be seen less as a simple mistake, and more as a reflection of a worldview.
Peter Hart
Peter Hart is the Domestic Communications Director at the Center for Economic and Policy Research.
On July 8, ABC World News anchor Diane Sawyer gave viewers the latest on the violence in the Gaza Strip-by stressing the threat to Israel:
We take you overseas now to the rockets raining down on Israel.... And here an Israeli family trying to salvage what they can, one woman standing speechless among the ruins.
Sawyer's narration accompanied these images:
One problem: Neither of those images is an "Israeli family." Both photos are from the Gaza Strip, and capture the aftermath of Israeli attacks.
I pointed this out to ABC World News on Twitter yesterday:
Thankfully, many others caught the same newscast, including Yousef Munayyer of the Palestine Center, which posted a video of ABC's embarrassing mistake. Journalist Rania Khalek wrote a piece for the Electronic Intifada (7/9/14) as well.
Finally, ABC posted this statement (7/10/14) early this morning:
So an honest mistake, right? That's one way of looking at it.
But there's a pretty well-established pattern of corporate media trying to paint the conflict as between equals, a type of false balance that treats the threats to Israeli lives and Palestinians lives as similar. But at times it's much more than that; this ABC report, and others like it, foreground the fear that Israelis are dealing with as sirens warn of incoming rockets from Gaza. "Running in terror as sirens wail" is how ABC correspondent Alex Marquardt began the segment right after Sawyer's introduction. He conveyed Israel's view of the conflict before shifting to life in Gaza.
At this point, the rockets targeting Israel have done very little damage. There are no reported Israeli deaths. But the fact that dozens of Palestinians had died, including several children, by the time ABC aired its report apparently did not cause them to consider this more newsworthy than Israeli fear.
The rocket attacks on Israel are treated as being more fundamentally important than the attacks being launched on Gaza. Sawyer's introduction at the top of the broadcast was this: "On the brink: Rockets raining down on Israel. The Israelis trying to blast them out of the sky. And our reporter is there on the front lines."
With that kind of set up, a newscast is bound to believe that the destruction they're showing viewers must be in Israel-even though anyone who's actually followed this story would know that the images show a level of destruction that is only happening in Gaza.
That's why ABC's error should be seen less as a simple mistake, and more as a reflection of a worldview.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.