SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Primary Threats Pushing Dems to Support Public Option
Sep 02, 2009
On Monday,
I noted that the upside of a contested Democratic primary here in
Colorado are huge, because it will force whomever the nominee is to be
far more concrete and progressive in their positions on issues. And
within two days, that truism has already been proven correct. It's a
good lesson not just here in Colorado, but everywhere: primaries are
good because they make legislators more accountable to the constituents
they are supposed to represent.
Notice on Saturday
that appointed Sen. Michael Bennet (D-CO) was still all wishy-washy on
the public option, saying he technically supports it but probably
wouldn't fight for it - and probably wouldn't vote against a bill
without a public option:
Bennet said that he favored a so-called public
option, which would provide an alternative insurance source for those
who can't get private insurance. "But as I stand here today, I think
it's very unlikely that the public option part of this will pass."
Now, just a few days after headlines about a potential Senate
primary challenge from former House Speaker Andrew Romanoff (D), Bennet
is aggressively insisting he will fight for the public option. The tone and the positioning represent a huge change.
The Denver Post editorial board - which leans conservative, by the way - has it exactly right:
[Bennet's] silence on a few contentious issues,
such as the Employee Free Choice Act, prompted Republicans to deride
him as "Silent Senator Bennet." But we don't think Sen. Michael
Bennet's silence was for lack of an opinion; rather, he was hoping to
stave off a primary challenger from his left...Bennet may not like it, but we say the more the merrier. Coloradans
deserve a choice, not a coronation...While Bennet is the U.S. senator
from Colorado, only one person - Ritter - has voted. Colorado will be
fortunate to have wide-open races on both sides of the aisle.
Whether or not Romanoff ends up running a progressive campaign or
not, it's nonetheless true that primaries are good for democracy
precisely because they force politicians to take positions and answer to voters.
To those who say that an appointed senator who has never run for
or held public office before automatically deserves an uncontested
primary and coronation, I say that's a lot of bullshit. Additionally,
with Bennet voting against cramdown, taking no position on EFCA and
flip-flopping around the public option, its clear that ColoradoPols has it exactly right:
There was a time, perhaps, when Democrats would
be making the smart political move by trying to disguise their every
opinion in order to appear more moderate. But that was also a time when
Republicans controlled everything. If Bennet ends up losing the
Democratic nomination to Romanoff, he'll have nobody to blame but
himself (and whoever advised him to be so overly cautious on policy
issues).
Put another way, if Bennet really wanted to avoid a primary, he
would have bent over backwards to be accountable to voters - not bent
over backwards to hide his positions and coddle big money. Those who
argue that longtime public servants like Romanoff or other Colorado
Democratic candidates should have looked at Bennet's behavior and
simply backed off show themselves to be far more loyal to
institutional/establishment sensibilities than legislative success,
progressive results, electoral choice and democracy itself.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
David Sirota
David Sirota is an award-winning journalist and bestselling author living in Denver, Colorado. He was nominated for an Academy Award for his work helping create the story for the film DON'T LOOK UP, which became one of the most widely viewed movies in Netflix's history. He is the founder and editor of The Daily Poster, an editor at large at Jacobin Magazine and a columnist at The Guardian. He served as Bernie Sanders' presidential campaign speechwriter in 2020. Sirota is the author of "Back to Our Future" and "Hostile Takeover: How Big Money & Corruption Conquered Our Government--And How We Take It Back". His website: www.davidsirota.com.
On Monday,
I noted that the upside of a contested Democratic primary here in
Colorado are huge, because it will force whomever the nominee is to be
far more concrete and progressive in their positions on issues. And
within two days, that truism has already been proven correct. It's a
good lesson not just here in Colorado, but everywhere: primaries are
good because they make legislators more accountable to the constituents
they are supposed to represent.
Notice on Saturday
that appointed Sen. Michael Bennet (D-CO) was still all wishy-washy on
the public option, saying he technically supports it but probably
wouldn't fight for it - and probably wouldn't vote against a bill
without a public option:
Bennet said that he favored a so-called public
option, which would provide an alternative insurance source for those
who can't get private insurance. "But as I stand here today, I think
it's very unlikely that the public option part of this will pass."
Now, just a few days after headlines about a potential Senate
primary challenge from former House Speaker Andrew Romanoff (D), Bennet
is aggressively insisting he will fight for the public option. The tone and the positioning represent a huge change.
The Denver Post editorial board - which leans conservative, by the way - has it exactly right:
[Bennet's] silence on a few contentious issues,
such as the Employee Free Choice Act, prompted Republicans to deride
him as "Silent Senator Bennet." But we don't think Sen. Michael
Bennet's silence was for lack of an opinion; rather, he was hoping to
stave off a primary challenger from his left...Bennet may not like it, but we say the more the merrier. Coloradans
deserve a choice, not a coronation...While Bennet is the U.S. senator
from Colorado, only one person - Ritter - has voted. Colorado will be
fortunate to have wide-open races on both sides of the aisle.
Whether or not Romanoff ends up running a progressive campaign or
not, it's nonetheless true that primaries are good for democracy
precisely because they force politicians to take positions and answer to voters.
To those who say that an appointed senator who has never run for
or held public office before automatically deserves an uncontested
primary and coronation, I say that's a lot of bullshit. Additionally,
with Bennet voting against cramdown, taking no position on EFCA and
flip-flopping around the public option, its clear that ColoradoPols has it exactly right:
There was a time, perhaps, when Democrats would
be making the smart political move by trying to disguise their every
opinion in order to appear more moderate. But that was also a time when
Republicans controlled everything. If Bennet ends up losing the
Democratic nomination to Romanoff, he'll have nobody to blame but
himself (and whoever advised him to be so overly cautious on policy
issues).
Put another way, if Bennet really wanted to avoid a primary, he
would have bent over backwards to be accountable to voters - not bent
over backwards to hide his positions and coddle big money. Those who
argue that longtime public servants like Romanoff or other Colorado
Democratic candidates should have looked at Bennet's behavior and
simply backed off show themselves to be far more loyal to
institutional/establishment sensibilities than legislative success,
progressive results, electoral choice and democracy itself.
David Sirota
David Sirota is an award-winning journalist and bestselling author living in Denver, Colorado. He was nominated for an Academy Award for his work helping create the story for the film DON'T LOOK UP, which became one of the most widely viewed movies in Netflix's history. He is the founder and editor of The Daily Poster, an editor at large at Jacobin Magazine and a columnist at The Guardian. He served as Bernie Sanders' presidential campaign speechwriter in 2020. Sirota is the author of "Back to Our Future" and "Hostile Takeover: How Big Money & Corruption Conquered Our Government--And How We Take It Back". His website: www.davidsirota.com.
On Monday,
I noted that the upside of a contested Democratic primary here in
Colorado are huge, because it will force whomever the nominee is to be
far more concrete and progressive in their positions on issues. And
within two days, that truism has already been proven correct. It's a
good lesson not just here in Colorado, but everywhere: primaries are
good because they make legislators more accountable to the constituents
they are supposed to represent.
Notice on Saturday
that appointed Sen. Michael Bennet (D-CO) was still all wishy-washy on
the public option, saying he technically supports it but probably
wouldn't fight for it - and probably wouldn't vote against a bill
without a public option:
Bennet said that he favored a so-called public
option, which would provide an alternative insurance source for those
who can't get private insurance. "But as I stand here today, I think
it's very unlikely that the public option part of this will pass."
Now, just a few days after headlines about a potential Senate
primary challenge from former House Speaker Andrew Romanoff (D), Bennet
is aggressively insisting he will fight for the public option. The tone and the positioning represent a huge change.
The Denver Post editorial board - which leans conservative, by the way - has it exactly right:
[Bennet's] silence on a few contentious issues,
such as the Employee Free Choice Act, prompted Republicans to deride
him as "Silent Senator Bennet." But we don't think Sen. Michael
Bennet's silence was for lack of an opinion; rather, he was hoping to
stave off a primary challenger from his left...Bennet may not like it, but we say the more the merrier. Coloradans
deserve a choice, not a coronation...While Bennet is the U.S. senator
from Colorado, only one person - Ritter - has voted. Colorado will be
fortunate to have wide-open races on both sides of the aisle.
Whether or not Romanoff ends up running a progressive campaign or
not, it's nonetheless true that primaries are good for democracy
precisely because they force politicians to take positions and answer to voters.
To those who say that an appointed senator who has never run for
or held public office before automatically deserves an uncontested
primary and coronation, I say that's a lot of bullshit. Additionally,
with Bennet voting against cramdown, taking no position on EFCA and
flip-flopping around the public option, its clear that ColoradoPols has it exactly right:
There was a time, perhaps, when Democrats would
be making the smart political move by trying to disguise their every
opinion in order to appear more moderate. But that was also a time when
Republicans controlled everything. If Bennet ends up losing the
Democratic nomination to Romanoff, he'll have nobody to blame but
himself (and whoever advised him to be so overly cautious on policy
issues).
Put another way, if Bennet really wanted to avoid a primary, he
would have bent over backwards to be accountable to voters - not bent
over backwards to hide his positions and coddle big money. Those who
argue that longtime public servants like Romanoff or other Colorado
Democratic candidates should have looked at Bennet's behavior and
simply backed off show themselves to be far more loyal to
institutional/establishment sensibilities than legislative success,
progressive results, electoral choice and democracy itself.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.
To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.
News & Opinion
Trending
Common Dreams, Inc. Founded 1997. Registered 501(c3) Non-Profit
Privacy Policy