Mar 29, 2018
"Advertisers start jumping ship and suddenly Ingraham realizes that mocking the misfortunes of a teen gun violence victim might be over the line."
"Laura Ingraham doesn't have any shame. She just understands that she finally crossed a line that would cost her advertisers."
--Brian Klaas
That was what Vox's David Roberts had to say about Fox News host Laura Ingraham's apology to Parkland school shooting survivor David Hogg on Thursday, which came around 24 hours after Ingraham mocked the 17-year-old student on Twitter for being rejected by several colleges.
In response to Ingraham's tweet, Hogg put together a list of Ingraham's top corporate advertisers and called on his more than 600,000 Twitter followers to pressure them to boycott Ingraham's show.
Hogg's campaign is already having an impact: As of this writing, at least three advertisers--TripAdvisor, Nutrish, and Wayfair--have announced that they are in the process of pulling advertisements from Ingraham's show.
Apparently feeling the heat, Ingraham took to Twitter on Thursday and--citing "the spirit of Holy Week"--wrote: "I apologize for any upset or hurt my tweet caused."
\u201cAny student should be proud of a 4.2 GPA \u2014incl. @DavidHogg111. On reflection, in the spirit of Holy Week, I apologize for any upset or hurt my tweet caused him or any of the brave victims of Parkland. For the record, I believe my show was the first to feature David...(1/2)\u201d— Laura Ingraham (@Laura Ingraham) 1522343174
\u201c... immediately after that horrific shooting and even noted how "poised" he was given the tragedy. As always, he\u2019s welcome to return to the show anytime for a productive discussion. WATCH: https://t.co/5wcd00wWpd (2/2)\u201d— Laura Ingraham (@Laura Ingraham) 1522343213
Critics were quick to let Ingraham know they're not buying the remorse.
"Laura Ingraham doesn't have any shame. She just understands that she finally crossed a line that would cost her advertisers," Brian Klass, a fellow at the London School of Economics, wrote on Twitter Thursday. "She could have apologized for ages after that horrible tweet. She only did after an advertiser bailed."
Many others piled on, denouncing her invocation of "Holy Week" as an effort to obscure her attempts to assauge jumpy corporate sponsors:
\u201c"in the spirit of Holy Week, I will apologize once my show starts hemorrhaging advertising money" https://t.co/6xOzcL0xPZ\u201d— Mark Follman (@Mark Follman) 1522344033
\u201ctwisty apology here where Ingraham apologizes for hurting Hogg's feelings, not for calling him a whiner: https://t.co/8lqfDERBKz\u201d— Matt Pearce \ud83e\udd85 (@Matt Pearce \ud83e\udd85) 1522343618
\u201cIf "Holy Week" meant anything to you, you wouldn't have said it in the first place. \n\nThese soulless cretins love to invoke religion after they cozy up to Satan. https://t.co/bKIQsTeErq\u201d— jordan (@jordan) 1522344539
An Unconstitutional Rampage
Trump and Musk are on an unconstitutional rampage, aiming for virtually every corner of the federal government. These two right-wing billionaires are targeting nurses, scientists, teachers, daycare providers, judges, veterans, air traffic controllers, and nuclear safety inspectors. No one is safe. The food stamps program, Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid are next. It’s an unprecedented disaster and a five-alarm fire, but there will be a reckoning. The people did not vote for this. The American people do not want this dystopian hellscape that hides behind claims of “efficiency.” Still, in reality, it is all a giveaway to corporate interests and the libertarian dreams of far-right oligarchs like Musk. Common Dreams is playing a vital role by reporting day and night on this orgy of corruption and greed, as well as what everyday people can do to organize and fight back. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover issues the corporate media never will, but we can only continue with our readers’ support. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
"Advertisers start jumping ship and suddenly Ingraham realizes that mocking the misfortunes of a teen gun violence victim might be over the line."
"Laura Ingraham doesn't have any shame. She just understands that she finally crossed a line that would cost her advertisers."
--Brian Klaas
That was what Vox's David Roberts had to say about Fox News host Laura Ingraham's apology to Parkland school shooting survivor David Hogg on Thursday, which came around 24 hours after Ingraham mocked the 17-year-old student on Twitter for being rejected by several colleges.
In response to Ingraham's tweet, Hogg put together a list of Ingraham's top corporate advertisers and called on his more than 600,000 Twitter followers to pressure them to boycott Ingraham's show.
Hogg's campaign is already having an impact: As of this writing, at least three advertisers--TripAdvisor, Nutrish, and Wayfair--have announced that they are in the process of pulling advertisements from Ingraham's show.
Apparently feeling the heat, Ingraham took to Twitter on Thursday and--citing "the spirit of Holy Week"--wrote: "I apologize for any upset or hurt my tweet caused."
\u201cAny student should be proud of a 4.2 GPA \u2014incl. @DavidHogg111. On reflection, in the spirit of Holy Week, I apologize for any upset or hurt my tweet caused him or any of the brave victims of Parkland. For the record, I believe my show was the first to feature David...(1/2)\u201d— Laura Ingraham (@Laura Ingraham) 1522343174
\u201c... immediately after that horrific shooting and even noted how "poised" he was given the tragedy. As always, he\u2019s welcome to return to the show anytime for a productive discussion. WATCH: https://t.co/5wcd00wWpd (2/2)\u201d— Laura Ingraham (@Laura Ingraham) 1522343213
Critics were quick to let Ingraham know they're not buying the remorse.
"Laura Ingraham doesn't have any shame. She just understands that she finally crossed a line that would cost her advertisers," Brian Klass, a fellow at the London School of Economics, wrote on Twitter Thursday. "She could have apologized for ages after that horrible tweet. She only did after an advertiser bailed."
Many others piled on, denouncing her invocation of "Holy Week" as an effort to obscure her attempts to assauge jumpy corporate sponsors:
\u201c"in the spirit of Holy Week, I will apologize once my show starts hemorrhaging advertising money" https://t.co/6xOzcL0xPZ\u201d— Mark Follman (@Mark Follman) 1522344033
\u201ctwisty apology here where Ingraham apologizes for hurting Hogg's feelings, not for calling him a whiner: https://t.co/8lqfDERBKz\u201d— Matt Pearce \ud83e\udd85 (@Matt Pearce \ud83e\udd85) 1522343618
\u201cIf "Holy Week" meant anything to you, you wouldn't have said it in the first place. \n\nThese soulless cretins love to invoke religion after they cozy up to Satan. https://t.co/bKIQsTeErq\u201d— jordan (@jordan) 1522344539
"Advertisers start jumping ship and suddenly Ingraham realizes that mocking the misfortunes of a teen gun violence victim might be over the line."
"Laura Ingraham doesn't have any shame. She just understands that she finally crossed a line that would cost her advertisers."
--Brian Klaas
That was what Vox's David Roberts had to say about Fox News host Laura Ingraham's apology to Parkland school shooting survivor David Hogg on Thursday, which came around 24 hours after Ingraham mocked the 17-year-old student on Twitter for being rejected by several colleges.
In response to Ingraham's tweet, Hogg put together a list of Ingraham's top corporate advertisers and called on his more than 600,000 Twitter followers to pressure them to boycott Ingraham's show.
Hogg's campaign is already having an impact: As of this writing, at least three advertisers--TripAdvisor, Nutrish, and Wayfair--have announced that they are in the process of pulling advertisements from Ingraham's show.
Apparently feeling the heat, Ingraham took to Twitter on Thursday and--citing "the spirit of Holy Week"--wrote: "I apologize for any upset or hurt my tweet caused."
\u201cAny student should be proud of a 4.2 GPA \u2014incl. @DavidHogg111. On reflection, in the spirit of Holy Week, I apologize for any upset or hurt my tweet caused him or any of the brave victims of Parkland. For the record, I believe my show was the first to feature David...(1/2)\u201d— Laura Ingraham (@Laura Ingraham) 1522343174
\u201c... immediately after that horrific shooting and even noted how "poised" he was given the tragedy. As always, he\u2019s welcome to return to the show anytime for a productive discussion. WATCH: https://t.co/5wcd00wWpd (2/2)\u201d— Laura Ingraham (@Laura Ingraham) 1522343213
Critics were quick to let Ingraham know they're not buying the remorse.
"Laura Ingraham doesn't have any shame. She just understands that she finally crossed a line that would cost her advertisers," Brian Klass, a fellow at the London School of Economics, wrote on Twitter Thursday. "She could have apologized for ages after that horrible tweet. She only did after an advertiser bailed."
Many others piled on, denouncing her invocation of "Holy Week" as an effort to obscure her attempts to assauge jumpy corporate sponsors:
\u201c"in the spirit of Holy Week, I will apologize once my show starts hemorrhaging advertising money" https://t.co/6xOzcL0xPZ\u201d— Mark Follman (@Mark Follman) 1522344033
\u201ctwisty apology here where Ingraham apologizes for hurting Hogg's feelings, not for calling him a whiner: https://t.co/8lqfDERBKz\u201d— Matt Pearce \ud83e\udd85 (@Matt Pearce \ud83e\udd85) 1522343618
\u201cIf "Holy Week" meant anything to you, you wouldn't have said it in the first place. \n\nThese soulless cretins love to invoke religion after they cozy up to Satan. https://t.co/bKIQsTeErq\u201d— jordan (@jordan) 1522344539
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.