Published on
YES! Magazine

'Regulators Should No Longer Ignore Rigorous Science'

Sandra Diaz

Just days after the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency approved the expansion of the largest mountaintop removal coal mine in West Virginia, prominent national scientists published a blockbuster study which concludes that mountaintop removal's impacts are "pervasive and irreversible."

Conducted by members of the National Academy of Sciences and published in the journal Science, the far-reaching study summarized dozens of pre-existing scientific papers analyzing the impacts of mountaintop removal mining, a type of surface coal mining that uses explosives to remove the tops of mountains to expose coal seams.

The study strongly criticized inadequate federal and state regulations on the practice, stating that "Current attempts to regulate [mountaintop mining/valley fill] practices are inadequate," and that "Regulators should no longer ignore rigorous science."

Environmental and Appalachian community advocates hailed the study as a powerful indictment against mountaintop removal mining. Opponents to the practice also expressed disappointment over the Obama Administration's fluctuating stance on mountaintop removal, citing inconsistencies with statements made by President Obama about restoring science to a more prominent position in agency decision-making.

In a recent interview the President told the political news organization, Politico, "It's about listening to what our scientists have to say, even when it's inconvenient-especially when it's inconvenient."

Appalachian coalfield residents, who have long been aware of the major environmental impacts from mountaintop removal mining, are hopeful that the study will embolden the Obama Administration to take more decisive action to ultimately end the practice.

"The scientific study released today comes as little surprise to us living in the Central Appalachian coal mining region," says Nina McCoy from Martin County, Ky., site of a large coal sludge dam break that overtook the county in 2000. "This should be the evidence the Obama Administration needs to close the floodgates on new mountaintop removal permits and stop the poisoning of our people."

Last year, the Obama Administration released a multi-agency plan to more strictly enforce laws regulating mountaintop removal, but the President stopped short of prohibiting the practice.

On Thursday, the EPA told National Public Radio's Diane Rehm Show that the agency does not have the authority to stop permitting mountaintop removal. However, critics believe there are other avenues through which the Administration could end the practice.

"The EPA has made commendable efforts to reduce the impacts of mountaintop removal on downstream water quality, but this study shows that mitigating and regulating the wholesale destruction of Appalachian Mountains is just not effective," said Dr. Matthew Wasson, ecologist for the environmental non-profit group Appalachian Voices and director of the campaign to end mountaintop removal on

"The President has the power to end mountaintop removal through any number of agency actions," Wasson added, "and he should call on Congress to pass the Clean Water Protection Act, a bill designed to end mountaintop removal-but the message from this study is that he's out of excuses for allowing mountaintop removal to continue."

This is the world we live in. This is the world we cover.

Because of people like you, another world is possible. There are many battles to be won, but we will battle them together—all of us. Common Dreams is not your normal news site. We don't survive on clicks. We don't want advertising dollars. We want the world to be a better place. But we can't do it alone. It doesn't work that way. We need you. If you can help today—because every gift of every size matters—please do.

Sandra Diaz is the Director for Development and Communications at Appalachian Voices.

Share This Article

More in: