Donate Today!

EMAIL SIGN UP!

 

Progressive Community

The press releases posted here have been submitted by

America's Progressive Community

For further information or to comment on this press release, please contact the organization directly.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
April 18, 2013
5:32 PM

CONTACT: Earthjustice

Kristen Boyles, Earthjustice, (206) 343-7340, ext. 1033
Tyson Johnston, Quinault Indian Nation, (360) 276.8211, ext. 234
Kari Birdseye, Earthjustice, (415) 217-2098

Tribe Opposes Proposal to Turn Grays Harbor into an Industrial Crude Oil Zone

Full environmental review of “pipelines-on-wheels” requested

Taholah, WA - April 18 - Today, the Quinault Indian Nation submitted comments to the City of Hoquiam and Washington Department of Ecology opposing the first of at least three proposed oil shipping facilities that could transform Grays Harbor into an industrial crude oil zone.

Westway Terminal Company, based in Louisiana and Texas, seeks authorization for construction of a new oil shipping terminal in Grays Harbor that would give it the capacity to store 800,000 barrels of crude oil at any given time. Westway predicts that it will bring at least ten million barrels of crude oil annually through Grays Harbor, via rail and marine vessels.

Two additional facilities for crude-by-rail—amounting to tens of millions of barrels of crude oil annually through Grays Harbor—are also being proposed in the same area, posing major environmental risks to the Grays Harbor community and the Quinault Indian Nation. State and local regulators have decided to allow this proposal to go forward with minimal environmental review.

“This project will bring more oil barge and ship traffic to Grays Harbor, risks of crude oil spills and harm to salmon, shellfish, and aquatic life, harm to our treaty rights and cultural historic sites, and increased rail traffic to communities from North Dakota to Hoquiam, said Tyson Johnston, 1st Councilman Quinault Indian Nation. “We cannot stand by and let this happen to our community.”

Crude-by-rail systems are a recent, but booming, phenomenon. Instead of pipelines, which are both expensive to build and subject to full environmental review and regulation, crude oil is loaded onto rail tank cars for deliveries to refineries. In 2012, major U.S. railroads transported at least 20 times as many carloads of crude oil as they did in 2008—a more than 2,000 percent increase in four years. The Grays Harbor proposals add marine vessels to this patchwork system: crude oil would arrive by rail, be transferred into large storage tanks, then be piped into ocean-going barges and ships to be transported and again transferred to refineries in Washington or California.

“This pipeline-on-wheels and its many risks and harms demands full environmental review,” said Kristen Boyles, an attorney with Earthjustice representing the Quinault Indian Nation. “State law demands special protections for Grays Harbor, but these short-cut systems are flying under the radar.”

###

Earthjustice is a non-profit public interest law firm dedicated to protecting the magnificent places, natural resources, and wildlife of this earth, and to defending the right of all people to a healthy environment. We bring about far-reaching change by enforcing and strengthening environmental laws on behalf of hundreds of organizations, coalitions and communities.



Comments

Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...