April, 04 2012, 04:04pm EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Laura Pereyra
Phone: 202.741.6258
Email: lpereyra@americanprogress.org
Release: New CAP Report Shows Latest Voter Suppression Efforts will Disenfranchise Millions
How Conservatives Are Conspiring to Disenfranchise Millions of Americans
WASHINGTON
In today's CAP Action press call with Rep. James Clyburn (D-SC), President and CEO of CAP Action Tom Perriello, and Director of Campus Progress Anne Johnson, the Center for American Progress released a report analyzing the latest voter suppression efforts to disenfranchise Americans. Conservative legislators are introducing and passing legislation that creates new barriers for those registering to vote that shortens the early voting period and imposes new requirements for already-registered voters. But voter fraud is extremely rare and the real result is that many potential voters will be disenfranchised--among them groups like college students, low-income voters, seniors, and minorities.
"This is not a response to systematic fraud, despite the fact that they've made an effort to unveil fraud. This is a response to one thing and one thing only, which is that they don't want people to vote and reforms that Progressives put in place were working" said Tom Perriello in a CAP Action press call today. He went on to say that, "what scared conservatives was that Americans were voting and for some reason they don't want that. And you have to ask the question, why don't they want Americans to vote? Why don't they want seniors and working class families to vote? All of those things make it more difficult to institute a set of economic policies that protect the one-percent instead of providing the American Dream to the American middle class and working class. So, it is important to understand why groups like ALEC...support efforts to systematically disenfranchise."
Efforts to enact voter restriction laws have not been seen on this scale since the era of Jim Crow laws in the South that aimed to disenfranchise blacks after Reconstruction. And right now the effort to rapidly spread these proposals can be seen in states as different as Texas and Wisconsin, led by pro-1 Percent, pro-conservative groups like the American Legislative Exchange Council, or ALEC. In 2011 more than 30 state legislatures considered legislation to make it harder for citizens to vote, with more than a dozen of those states succeeding in passing these bills. The effort to enact antivoting legislation has continued unabated so far in 2012.
Rep. James Clyburn (D-SC) put it this way, "They are bringing actions against people who were out there working getting people out to the polls accusing them of fraud, and everyone knows that all it was is [they were] transporting people to vote, helping them to vote absentee...And they are unfair and as un-American as anything I have ever seen. This is the kind of thing that is going on today that we saw when things were happening in southern states to keep them from voting and intimidate them. Yes, I am very anxious about where we are today..."
What's more, is as more young and minority voters enter the voting age, conservatives have an increasing reason to strengthen voter ID laws as these voters are strongly progressive. In 2008 about 48 million millennial generation voters--born between 1978 and 2000--became old enough to vote. Two-thirds of these young voters and Hispanic voters delivered their votes to then-Sen. Barack Obama. By 2012 that will increase to 64 million, or 29 percent of all eligible voters. By 2020, 90 million will be eligible to vote, or 40 percent of all eligible voters.
Anne Johnson, Director of Campus Progress, said that "the millennial generation, as a whole, is a very engaged generation-- they volunteer in their communities, they get involved in local efforts to make their communities better places, they participate civically, they volunteer on campaigns. And the idea that people are trying to restrict the access of these young people to voting is unbelievable. These attacks, led by ALEC, other organizations, and conservative legislatures around the country, are really focused on keeping young people out of the electorate. They don't like the way young people are voting and so rather than trying to win on policy issues, they are just going to keep young people out of the electorate by making it harder for them to get registered and for them to vote."
See the following fast facts from the report:
- More than 30 state legislatures considered legislation to make it harder for citizens to vote, with more than a dozen succeeding in passing these bills with the help of pro-1 Percent, pro-conservative groups such as ALEC.
- The five worse states for voting rights are Florida, Texas, Tennessee, Wisconsin, and Kansas.
- 11 percent of American citizens do not possess a government-issued photo ID (that is over 21 million citizens).
- Three of the photo ID bills to have passed--in South Carolina, Texas, and Tennessee--expressly do not allow students to use photo IDs issued by educational institutions to vote, and Wisconsin's bill effectively excludes most student IDs as well.
- Around 3 million Americans tried to vote in the 2008 election but could not, due to voter registration problems.
- As many as 25 percent of African Americans do not possess a current and valid form of government issued ID, compared to 11 percent of all races.
Spreading Suppression: The proliferation of voter suppression laws in 2012
To click the full report, click here.
To listen to today's CAP Action press call, click here.
To contact CAP experts on the issue, please email Laura Pereyra at lpereyra@americanprogress.org or call 202.203.8689.
The Center for American Progress is a think tank dedicated to improving the lives of Americans through ideas and action. We combine bold policy ideas with a modern communications platform to help shape the national debate, expose the hollowness of conservative governing philosophy and challenge the media to cover the issues that truly matter.
LATEST NEWS
'Historic': Dartmouth Men's Basketball Team Votes to Unionize
More Perfect Union called the move "a precedent that could change college sports."
Mar 05, 2024
The Dartmouth College men's basketball team voted Tuesday to unionize, becoming the first-ever U.S. collegiate athletes to do so—but the private New Hampshire university is mounting a challenge to the move that could end up in federal court.
Dartmouth players voted 13-2 to join the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) Local 560 in an election supervised by the U.S. National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) and the university's human resources department.
"Today is a big day for our team," said Dartmouth players Cade Haskins and Romeo Myrthil, two leaders of the organizing effort. "We stuck together all season and won this election. It is self-evident that we, as students, can also be both campus workers and union members. Dartmouth seems to be stuck in the past. It's time for the age of amateurism to end."
Haskins told the Associated Press that "I think this is just the start" and that the Dartmouth vote "is going to have a domino effect on other cases across the country, and that could lead to other changes."
SEIU Local 560 president Chris Peck said he is "looking forward to standing in solidarity" with Dartmouth players "as they begin to negotiate their historic first contract."
Last month, the NLRB's regional office ruled that the Dartmouth players are employees of the school with collective bargaining rights. Team members had previously petitioned the NLRB to organize with the SEIU.
Dartmouth officials appealed to the full NLRB.
"For Ivy League students who are varsity athletes, academics are of primary importance, and athletic pursuit is part of the educational experience," the school said in a statement. "Classifying these students as employees simply because they play basketball is as unprecedented as it is inaccurate. We, therefore, do not believe unionization is appropriate."
Colleges and universities have been urging U.S. lawmakers to pass legislation prohibiting student-athletes from being classified as employees, asserting that being forced to provide pay and benefits and allowing them to form or join unions threatens their multibillion-dollar monopoly.
The National Collegiate Athletic Association weighed in on the Dartmouth vote:
The association believes change in college sports is long overdue and is pursuing significant reforms. However, there are some issues the NCAA cannot address alone, and the association looks forward to working with Congress to make needed changes in the best interest of all student-athletes.
Labor advocates and progressive politicians cheered the vote, with the AFL-CIO calling it a "huge moment."
AFL-CIO president Liz Shuler said that "NCAA athletes make billions in profits for their universities and they deserve a seat at the table. This is the start of a new chapter in collegiate athletics."
U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) wrote on social media: "Congratulations to the members of the Dartmouth men's basketball team on voting overwhelmingly to become the first college sports team in America to form a union. It's time for Dartmouth to respect their constitutional right to organize and bargain for a fair contract now."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Progressives Cheer Senate Exit of Kyrsten Sinema
Sinema's exit sets up an election between Rep. Ruben Gallego and former television anchor Kari Lake.
Mar 05, 2024
Sen. Kyrsten Sinema—infamous for voting down a federal $15 minimum wage, high-fiving Sen. Joe Manchin to kill filibuster reform, and overall kowtowing to corporate interests while hiding behind euphemistic claims of "moderation"—announced Tuesday she will not run for reelection this year, news welcomed by progressives both in her home state of Arizona and beyond.
Sinema's departure from the 2024 campaign means the Arizona Senate race will most likely be between Democratic Rep. Ruben Gallego and Republican former television new anchor and unsuccessful gubernatorial candidate Kari Lake.
Sinema claimed in a video announcing her decision not to run that moderate politicians are "not what America wants right now."
"Because I choose civility, understanding, listening, working together to get stuff done, I will leave the Senate at the end of this year," she said.
Rep. Gallego put out a statement thanking Sinema for her "nearly two decades of service," and he invited her to campaign against Kari Lake.
Other progressives took the opportunity to let their disgust be known.
"Sinema will go down in history as a feckless, corrupt egomaniac who sabotaged abortion and voting rights and destroyed her own political career in the process," said Leah Greenberg, co-founder of the advocacy group Indivisible.
"Enjoy your lobbying gig and leave the rest of us alone forever," Greenberg added.
Sinema will have served one term as a senator. She previously served in the House of Representatives for six years and the Arizona Senate for one year. Though Sinema started her career as a member of the Green Party, she later became a Democrat and then switched to being an independent in late 2022—a move that deeply wounded the Biden administration's domestic agenda by slicing the Democratic majority in the Senate to the bone.
Sinema was an obstacle to achieving progressive policy goals in Congress, blocking many key priorities, including eliminating the legislative filibuster, along with Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.V.). She infamously did a thumbs down in the Senate gallery to vote against raising the federal minimum wage to $15 per hour in 2021.
The group hoping to oust Sinema, the Replace Sinema campaign, put out a statement in response to the news of her not seeking reelection.
"Sinema obstructed President Biden's Build Back Better agenda, got in the way of fundamental rights like abortion care and voting, and did the bidding of her wealthy donors who fund her luxury lifestyle," the group wrote. "We succeeded in first pushing her out of the party—by making clear she couldn't win a Democratic primary—and now we've also helped push her out of the Senate. Good. Arizonans deserve better."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Groups Forge Emergency Coalition to Pressure US on Gaza Cease-Fire
"It is long past time for the United States to use its leverage and uphold U.S. law to end Israel's indiscriminate bombardment of Gaza and have this war come to an end."
Mar 05, 2024
A broad coalition of advocacy groups on Tuesday launched an emergency online campaign to pressure U.S. lawmakers to support an immediate and permanent cease-fire in Gaza.
Demand Progress, Oxfam America, the Friends Committee on National Legislation, Win Without War, Common Defense, the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, and 23 partner groups started CeasefireAction.com, which includes a searchable database of each member of Congress and where they stand on the cease-fire issue, as well as a tool for contacting lawmakers to urge them to publicly support a cease-fire.
"It is long past time for the United States to use its leverage and uphold U.S. law to end Israel's indiscriminate bombardment of Gaza and have this war come to an end," said Seth Binder, director of advocacy at the Middle East Democracy Center, a coalition member. "The humanitarian catastrophe that millions of Palestinians are suffering through and its seismic moral and strategic consequences should compel members of Congress to do everything in its power to secure a cessation of hostilities."
According to the database, 164 of the 536 members of Congress "support some form" of cessation of hostilities in Gaza. All of them are Democrats, plus independent Sens. Angus King (Maine) and Bernie Sanders (Vt.). Seventy-six lawmakers "fully support" a cease-fire.
The launch of CeasefireAction.com comes as Israeli forces continue their relentless bombardment, invasion, and starvation of Gaza's 2.3 million people, around 90% of whom have been forcibly displaced. According to Palestinian and international humanitarian officials, more than 102,000 Palestinians have been killed or wounded by Israeli bombs and bullets, with at least 7,000 others missing and believed dead and buried beneath the rubble of some of the hundreds of thousands of homes and other buildings destroyed or damaged by Israeli bombardment.
Israel's conduct in war, along with statements by members of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's far-right government and Knesset lawmakers, are cited in a South Africa-led genocide case filed in the International Court of Justice in The Hague. On January 26, the ICJ issued a preliminary ruling that found Israel is "plausibly" committing genocide and ordered the country's government to "take all measures within its power" to prevent genocidal acts.
As Israeli forces are poised for a major ground invasion of Rafah, where an estimated 1.5 million Palestinians—the vast majority of them forcibly displaced from other parts of Gaza—are sheltering, "it is more urgent than ever that Congress and the [Biden] administration support an immediate, permanent cease-fire," said Demand Progress policy adviser Hajar Hammado.
"We need an end to the violence, a release of [Israeli] hostages, and the free flow of humanitarian aid to alleviate the immense scale of suffering," Hammado added. "This new tool, CeasefireAction.com, empowers constituents to hold their members of Congress accountable for their stances in this critical moment. A temporary, six-week cease-fire is not enough—we need an immediate, permanent cease-fire now."
The Biden administration—which is seeking an additional $14.3 billion in U.S. military aid for Israel atop the nearly $4 billion it already gets from Washington each year—has pushed for a temporary cease-fire deal ahead of Ramadan in recent days under intensifying pressure from the U.S. public.
Vice President Kamala Harris on Sunday said that "given the immense scale of suffering in Gaza, there must be an immediate cease-fire for at least the next six weeks."
"People in Gaza are starving," Harris said. "What we are seeing every day in Gaza is devastating. We have seen reports of families eating leaves and animal feed, children dying from malnutrition and dehydration. Too many innocent Palestinians have been killed."
Meanwhile, the Biden administration—which twice sidestepped congressional review to expedite weapons transfers to Israel since October 7—is preparing to send thousands more bombs to the country's military.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular