August, 18 2010, 04:11pm EDT
Israel: Stop Demolishing Bedouin Homes
Structures Destroyed for Fourth Time in a Month in Negev Village
JERUSALEM
The Israeli government should immediately stop demolishing the homes
of Bedouin citizens in the Negev desert in southern Israel and should
compensate those displaced and allow them to return to their village
pending a final agreement that respects their rights under international
law, Human Rights Watch said today. Hundreds of police officers arrived
unannounced at 6 a.m. on August 17, 2010, in Al Araqib and demolished
about 20 makeshift structures, leaving scores of residents homeless as
summer temperatures soared to 40 degrees Celsius, or 105 degrees
Fahrenheit.
Israel Lands Authority officials accompanied by large numbers of
police had demolished the entire village on July 27, as Human Rights
Watch previously reported,
and returned three more times to destroy temporary structures that some
residents had erected on the site. The demolitions have forcibly
displaced 300 people - about half of them children - even as some
residents are pursuing land claims in Israeli courts.
"Israel is displaying a shocking disregard for the basic rights
of citizens who happen to be Bedouin Arabs," said Joe Stork, deputy
Middle East director at Human Rights Watch. "These demolitions should
stop right now."
Israel has demolished thousands of Negev Bedouin homes since the
1970s, and over 200 since the beginning of 2009. Human Rights Watch
documented the systematic discrimination that Bedouin citizens face in a
130-page report, "Off the Map," in March 2008.
The demolitions in the village on August 10 and 17 are the first
carried out by Israeli authorities on a large scale in the Negev during
the Muslim holiday of Ramadan. Amatzia Tvua, manager in the Inspection
Division of the Israel Land Administration (ILA) - the government agency
responsible for managing state-owned lands - told Israeli media on
August 10 that "if we have to demolish during Ramadan, we will, although
we try to be sensitive."
Negev Bedouin are Israeli citizens, but approximately 90,000 of them
live in "unrecognized" towns that are at risk of demolition. Because the
government considers the villages illegal, it has not connected them to
basic services and infrastructure such as water, electricity, sewage
treatment, and garbage disposal. Bedouin constitute an estimated 25
percent of the population of the northern Negev, but after being
repeatedly displaced since 1948, they now occupy less than 2 percent of
its land. While refusing to recognize Bedouin land claims to the area,
Israel has granted large tracts of land to Jewish Israelis. In a series
of laws, the latest passed on July 12, the state retroactively legalized
individual farms in the area, almost all of which belong to Jews.
Israeli officials contend that they are simply enforcing zoning and
building codes and insist that Bedouin can relocate to seven existing
government-planned townships or a handful of newly recognized villages.
The state requires Bedouin who move to the townships to renounce their
ancestral land claims - unthinkable for most Bedouin, who have claims to
land passed down from parent to child over generations. The
government-planned townships, seven of the eight poorest communities in
Israel, are ill-equipped to handle any influx of new residents.
In response to pending legal claims to the land that Al Araqib
residents are pursuing in Beer Sheva District Court, Israeli authorities
contend that the Bedouin have never had recognized land claims in the
area.
After demolishing the entire village on July 27, inspectors from the
ILA accompanied by police officers went to the site for the second time
on August 4 and demolished approximately 20 structures that had been
rebuilt. A member of the Knesset, Taleb el-Sana, was present that day
and was forcibly removed from a structure by police officers. He lost
consciousness and was taken to a hospital. Police detained six people
for questioning, including village head Sheikh Saiah al-Turi, and
released them later that day. Three of them were given restraining
orders prohibiting their access to the village for three days.
On August 10, the first day of Ramadan, police officers and ILA
inspectors arrived at the village for the third time at 6 a.m. and
demolished all the structures rebuilt in the village. Two people were
arrested and released later that day.
Israeli media reported that the Israel Police Southern District head
commander, Yochanan Danino, visited the area later that day accompanied
by the director of the Internal Security Ministry, Hagai Peled. Danino
accused the Bedouin of "forcing the police back to the area," and swore
to "punish the criminals to the full extent of the law and demand they
pay for every shekel incurred by the state for their recurring
invasions."
Danino added that the state attorney's office was preparing a
lawsuit seeking "millions of shekels" from the Bedouin residents, and
said that the state is "trying to get a message through that has yet to
register, that we will not allow them to return to the lands."
Shlomo Tzizer, head of the Inspection Division of the ILA, told
Israeli media that the July 27 evacuation cost the ILA 300,000 NIS
(US$80,000), but that the overall operation that day cost 2 million NIS
(US$530,000), including days spent making preparations by 1,300 police
officers, bus rentals, police helicopter, horsemen, and other forces.
Israel ratified the International Covenant on Economic, Social and
Cultural Rights in 1991, requiring it to guarantee the right to housing.
The 2007 UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, which
reflects international law, states that indigenous peoples have the
right to lands they traditionally owned, occupied, or otherwise used,
and that states should give legal recognition to this right. It also
says that no relocation of indigenous peoples should take place without
their free, prior, and informed consent and only after prior agreement
on just and fair compensation.
Human Rights Watch is one of the world's leading independent organizations dedicated to defending and protecting human rights. By focusing international attention where human rights are violated, we give voice to the oppressed and hold oppressors accountable for their crimes. Our rigorous, objective investigations and strategic, targeted advocacy build intense pressure for action and raise the cost of human rights abuse. For 30 years, Human Rights Watch has worked tenaciously to lay the legal and moral groundwork for deep-rooted change and has fought to bring greater justice and security to people around the world.
LATEST NEWS
Amid Spying Fight, House Passes Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act
"As FANFSA and the 702 reauthorization move to the Senate, lawmakers in that chamber need to take a stand for the rights of people in the United States," said one advocate.
Apr 17, 2024
While applauding the U.S. House of Representatives' bipartisan passage of a bill to ensure that "law enforcement and intelligence agencies can't do an end-run around the Constitution by buying information from data brokers" on Wednesday, privacy advocates highlighted that Congress is trying to extend and expand a long-abused government spying program.
The House voted 219-199 for Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act (FANFSA), which won support from 96 Democrats and 123 Republicans, including the lead sponsor, Rep. Warren Davidson (R-Ohio). Named for the constitutional amendment that protects against unreasonable searches and seizures, H.R. 4639 would close what campaigners call the data broker loophole.
"The privacy violations that flow from law enforcement entities circumventing the Fourth Amendment undermine civil liberties, free expression, and our ability to control what happens to our data," said Free Press Action policy counsel Jenna Ruddock. "These impacts affect everyone who uses digital platforms that extract our personal information any time we open a browser or visit social media and other websites—even when we go to events like demonstrations and other places with our phones revealing our locations."
"We're grateful that the House passed these vital and popular protections," she added. "The bill would prevent flagrant abuses of our privacy by government authorities in league with unscrupulous third-party data brokers. Making this legislation into law with Senate passage too would be a decisive and long-overdue action against government misuse of this clandestine business sector that traffics in our personal data for profit."
Wednesday's vote followed the House sending the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act to the Senate. H.R. 7888 would reauthorize Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), which allows for warrantless spying on noncitizens abroad but also sweeps up Americans' data.
The House notably included an amendment forcing a wide range of individuals and businesses to cooperate with government spying operations but rejected an amendment that would have added a warrant requirement to the bill, which the Senate could vote on as soon as Thursday.
Noting those decisions on the FISA reauthorization legislation, Ruddock stressed that "today's vote is a victory but follows a recent loss and ongoing threat as that Section 702 bill moves to the Senate this week too."
"As FANFSA and the 702 reauthorization move to the Senate, lawmakers in that chamber need to take a stand for the rights of people in the United States," she argued. "That means passing FANFSA and reforming Section 702 authority—and prioritizing everyone's First and Fourth Amendment rights."
Jeramie Scott, senior counsel and director of the Electronic Privacy Information Center's Project on Surveillance Oversight, also praised the House's FANFSA passage on Wednesday.
"The passage of the Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale underscores the extent to which reining in abusive warrantless surveillance is a bipartisan issue," Scott said. "We urge the Senate to take up this measure and close the data broker loophole."
Kia Hamadanchy, senior policy counsel at ACLU, similarly said Wednesday that "the bipartisan passage of this bill is a flashing warning sign to the government that if it wants our data, it must get a warrant."
Hamadanchy added that "we hope this vote puts a fire under the Senate to protect their constituents and rein in the government's warrantless surveillance of Americans, once and for all."
Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), a critic of the pending 702 bill and FANFSA's lead sponsor in the upper chamber, called the the House's Wednesday vote "a huge win for privacy" and said that "now it's time for the Senate to follow suit."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Leaked Cables Show Biden Pressuring Nations to Oppose Palestine's UN Membership
"This is the evidence that President Biden's talk about a two-state solution is nothing but idle talk," said one former Lebanese diplomat.
Apr 17, 2024
As the United Nations Security Council prepares to vote Thursday on Palestine's bid to become a full U.N. member, the Biden administration—which claims to support Palestinian statehood—is lobbying UNSC nations in an effort to wrangle enough "no" votes so that the United States can avoid resorting to a veto.
Leaked cables obtained by The Intercept show U.S. pressure on Security Council members including Malta—which currently presides over the body—and Ecuador.
While claiming that President Joe Biden backs "Palestinian aspirations for statehood," one of the cables asserts that "it remains the U.S. view that the most expeditious path toward a political horizon for the Palestinian people is in the context of a normalization agreement between Israel and its neighbors."
"We therefore urge you not to support any potential Security Council resolution recommending the admission of 'Palestine' as a U.N. member state, should such a resolution be presented to the Security Council for a decision in the coming days and weeks," the document advises.
The U.S. argument essentially is that the U.N. should not create an independent Palestinian state by fiat—even though that's precisely how the world body voted in 1947 to establish the modern state of Israel.
The renewed push for Palestine's U.N. membership comes as Israel wages a genocidal war on the Gaza Strip. The Palestinian Authority, which hasn't controlled Gaza for nearly two decades, rejected the Biden administration's requests to hold off on seeking full membership.
"We wanted the U.S. to provide a substantive alternative to U.N. recognition. They didn't," one unnamed Palestinian official toldAxios on Wednesday. "We believe full membership in the U.N. for Palestine is way overdue. We have waited more than 12 years since our initial request."
As The Intercept's Ken Klippenstein and Daniel Boguslaw noted:
Since 2011, the U.N. Security Council has rejected the Palestinian Authority's request for full member status. On April 2, the Palestinian Observer Mission to the U.N. requested that the council once again take up consideration of its membership application. According to the first State Department cable, U.N. meetings since the beginning of April suggest that Algeria, China, Guyana, Mozambique, Russia, Slovenia, Sierra Leone, and Malta support granting Palestine full membership to the U.N. It also says that France, Japan, and Korea are undecided, while the United Kingdom will likely abstain from a vote.
Along with the United States, China, France, Russia, and the United Kingdom are permanent members of the UNSC, so they also have veto power.
Ahead of Thursday's planned vote, Spain has been doing its own lobbying in Europe to build greater support for Palestinian statehood. At a joint Tuesday press conference with Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez, Slovenian Prime Minister Robert Golob said the question is "when, not if, but when is the best moment to recognize Palestine."
Belgium—which is seeking economic sanctions against Israel in response to its genocidal war on Gaza—is expected to join Spain's push for Palestinian statehood after the country's European Union presidency expires in June.
Currently, 139 of the U.N.'s 193 member states recognize Palestine as an independent state.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu—who has also claimed to support a so-called "two-state solution"—has alternately boasted about thwarting Palestinian statehood.
Critics pointed to the leaked cables as more proof of U.S. duplicity and double standards on the Israel-Palestine issue.
"This is the evidence that President Biden's talk about a two-state solution is nothing but idle talk," Massoud Maalouf, a former Lebanese ambassador to Canada, Chile, and Poland, said on social media.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Database Exposes 'Illicit Network Undermining Democracy Around the World'
Yanis Varoufakis hailed the effort as "a treasure chest of well-researched reports on how the reactionaries of the world unite."
Apr 17, 2024
"Coups. Assassinations. Riots. Detentions. Disinformation. We know the tactics that have been deployed to undermine our democracies. But who is behind them?"
Progressive International (PI) asks and answers this and other questions with an extensive new database published Wednesday that connects the dots in what the leftist group calls the "Reactionary International"—a loose global network of right-wing leaders and organizations working to subvert democratic institutions.
PI calls it an "illicit network undermining democracy around the world."
"Today is a mask-off moment for the Reactionary International and the parties, politicians, judges, journalists, foundations, think tanks, tech platforms, NGOs, activists, financiers, and entrepreneurs that comprise it," PI said.
"After a year of preparation, we finally open the doors to our new research consortium, exposing the global network of reactionary forces that corrode our democracies, destroy our planet, and drive us closer to world war," the group added.
"The twin insurrections at the U.S. Capitol in 2021 and BrasÃlia's Three Powers Plaza in 2023 left no doubt about the international coordination of reactionary forces," PI argued. "Yet far too little is known about the entities of this network, their sources of financing, and their institutional allies operating inside our political systems."
Ultimately, PI aims to "support democratic systems to become more resilient to their insidious tactics."
From leaders like Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, and former U.S. President Donald Trump—the presumptive 2024 Republican presidential nominee—to evangelical Christian groups influencing laws in African countries criminalizing LGBTQ+ people and tech companies empowering ubiquitous state surveillance, Reactionary International is a who's-who of the world's right-wing forces.
A cursory search of the database's contents shows users can:
- Learn about Israel's NSO, Rayzone, and Team Jorge, and how a team of Tel Aviv tech entrepreneurs fuel unrest in Latin America;
- Meet the Grey Wolves, Turkey's roving death squad with links to President Recep Tayyip ErdoÄŸan and the ethno-nationalists in his governing coalition; and
- Explore the global network of the Falun Gong, its Trump-connected media outlet The Epoch Times, and its traveling dance troupe known as Shen Yun.
Yanis Varoufakis, a PI member and secretary-general of the left-wing Democracy in Europe Movement 2025, called the database "a treasure chest of well-researched reports on how the reactionaries of the world unite."
PI invites the public to contribute to the database.
"Together, we will not only name, shame, and expose the forces of the far right—but also dismantle their network of complicity," the group said.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular