For Immediate Release
Food Industry Threatens to Kill Food Safety Bill if BPA Restrictions Included
Four Senators at Center of Debate Over Toxic Plastics Chemical
WASHINGTON - As the
prepares to take up a massive food safety reform bill, the food industry
threatening to kill the bill if it includes restrictions on toxic
in food packaging and containers. The decision is in the hands of four
who must choose between appeasing special-interest industry demands and
responding to growing scientific and consumer concern about the serious
negative health effects associated with BPA exposure.
health committee is
considering incorporating into the Food Safety Modernization Act some
of legislation sponsored by Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., that seeks
BPA from all food and beverage containers regulated by the Food and Drug
Administration. The key committee members chairman Tom Harkin of Iowa,
majority member Chris Dodd of Connecticut, and ranking Republican
Enzi of Wyoming and Judd Gregg of New Hampshire.
In a story
published Monday in
The Washington Post (http://bit.ly/cDD1Hr),
said: “I feel very strongly that the government should protect
people from harmful chemicals. BPA should be addressed as a part of the
safety overhaul.” Earlier, she told Politico that if her legislation is
not added to the bill before it goes to the floor, she would offer some
her proposal as a floor amendment.
also reported that the
Grocery Manufacturers Association and other business groups, including
Chamber of Commerce, have told Harkin and Enzi that they will not
food safety bill if it includes BPA restrictions. Janet Nudelman, policy
director for the Breast Cancer Fund, called the threat “irresponsible
has a critical
question before it: At the end of the day who are they accountable to
industry that is fighting science and consumer demand, or infants, kids
pregnant women who need to be protected from this toxic chemical?” said
executive director of MomsRising, a national network of more than 1
moms, agreed. “The food industry’s threat to block the food safety
bill if it contains a provision to more strictly regulate BPA shows a
for protecting the health and safety of its own customers,” said
pointed to the enormous
body of evidence illustrating BPA’s harm.
BPA have been restricted in five states and 13 more are considering
doing the same,”
she said. Consumers are demanding BPA-free products, and manufacturers
retailers are responding. Everyone, regardless of where they shop or
they live in, should have access to BPA-free food products. Only
Mid-Year Campaign: Your Support is Needed Now.
Common Dreams is a small non-profit - Over 90% of the Common Dreams budget comes from reader support. No advertising; no paywalls: our content is free. But our costs are real. Common Dreams needs your help today! If you're a regular reader—or maybe a new one—and you haven't yet pitched in, could you make a contribution today? Because this is the truth: Readers, like you, keep us alive. Please make a donation now so we can continue to work for you.