April, 14 2010, 09:15am EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Sarah Dransfield, Oxfam Press Officer on +44 (0) 1865 472269,
+44
(0)7767 085636 or sdransfield@oxfam.org.uk
Rich Country Donors Still Well Off-Track on Their Aid Commitments
The 2009 overseas aid figures, released today, show that rich countries are failing to deliver on their promises to poorer countries.
LONDON
Today's figures, from the
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), show that
although there has been a fraction of an increase in total aid, from
$122 to $123 billion, the amount of aid has actually fallen by $3.5
billion when compared with last year's prices. This comes at a time when
the World Bank forecasts that 50,000 more children in Sub-Saharan
countries may have died this year because of the financial crisis.
Max Lawson of Oxfam said: "This lackluster performance from donors is
not close to meeting the needs of poor countries, who are suffering now
from the impact of the economic crisis. It is a scandal that more than
half of rich nations have cut their aid this year and are giving less of
their income than last year - just 31 cents in every hundred dollars."
Forty years ago* rich countries pledged to spend 0.7 per cent
of their annual national incomes in development aid. And so far, just
five nations, all European - Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Luxembourg and the
Netherlands - have actually reached the target.
Today's figures show that some donors have increased aid,
demonstrating that even in hard economic times this is possible where
there is political will to meet international commitments.
Lawson said, "Whilst some countries like the UK and Belgium have made
efforts to increase aid, others are really letting the side down.
Italy's aid spending has plunged by a massive 31 per cent, Ireland's by
18.9 per cent, Germany's by 12 per cent, Japan by 10.7 per cent and
Canada by 9.5 per cent."
"Its crunch time. More aid is vital now to reach the
Millennium Development Goals by 2015, and world leaders must rebuild
their credibility on the global stage before its too late. All rich
countries must commit to timetables to meet 0.7, backed by national
binding legislation, when they meet at the UN summit in September to
review their progress on MDGs."
Delivered well, aid saves lives. In Nepal
development aid has been pivotal in dramatically improving healthcare,
with a series of reforms including abolishing health fees. Since 2006
the under-five mortality rate has reduced by 22 per cent, neo-natal
mortality by 38 per cent and maternal mortality has fallen by 19 per
cent. In fact maternal mortality has now fallen by 58 per cent in the
country since 1996 - a towering success.
New research published on Monday** revealed that maternal deaths have
fallen worldwide, from over half a million a year in 1980 to less than
350,000 in 2008.
"The heartening fall in global maternal mortality comes in large part
because of well-targeted aid spending. It is unconscionable for rich
countries to fail on aid promises when there are such rich rewards to be
won in the fight against poverty," said Lawson.
A new Oxfam report, "21st Century Aid," recognizing success and
tackling failure, to be published later this month, will call on donors
to meet their aid commitments, and do more to improve quality of aid.
Oxfam is calling for donors to commit to legally binding legislation and
national timetables to reach at least 0.7 per cent of their national
income in aid, and ensure all aid is aimed at meeting poverty reduction
goals.
Notes to editors
* In 1970 the UN General Assembly committed to
providing 0.7% of Gross national product in aid. This was
recommitted to by rich countries attending the 2002 Monterrey Consensus
on Financing for Development, and at the G8 meeting in Gleneagles in
2005 where European members of the G8 also recommitted to reaching the
0.7% target, by 2015.
**According to a study published in the Lancet.
- Aid levels from G8 member countries Canada and Japan
have dropped, by 10.2 per cent and 9.5 per cent respectively. - Aid from the United States registered a small
increase from 0.19 to 0.20 per cent of GDP. - The United Kingdom remains on target for its
aid commitments, reporting a jump from 0.43 per cent of GDP in 2008 to
0.52 per cent in 2009. - France has increased its aid from 0.39 per cent
to 0.46 per cent of GDP.
After debt relief is deducted the increase in aid from 2008 to 2009
was better, but still way off track to meet promised increases.
European Union 15 Member States pledged to spend 0.7 per cent of their
GNI on aid by 2015. EU 12 Member States committed to spend 0.33% of
their GNI on aid by 2015. The collective EU target for next year is to
provide 0.56% of GNI in aid by 2010. The EU is off track to meet this
target.
Some donors have increased the percentage of aid given, but are actually
spending less.
- Aid from the Netherlands rose slightly as a
percentage of the economy, but actual spend fell by nearly $600 million. - Spain's aid rose from 0.45 to 0.46 as a
percentage of GDP but its actual spend fell by $200 million, a
disappointing record for the country holding the Presidency of the
European Union. - Although both Sweden and Luxembourg gave
over 1% of GNI, the actual amount given was less than in 2008.
Oxfam International is a global movement of people who are fighting inequality to end poverty and injustice. We are working across regions in about 70 countries, with thousands of partners, and allies, supporting communities to build better lives for themselves, grow resilience and protect lives and livelihoods also in times of crisis.
LATEST NEWS
Person Self-Immolates Outside Courthouse of Trump's NY Trial
An unverified online manifesto identifies the person as "an investigative researcher" who has discovered that "our own government (along with many of their allies) is about to hit us with an apocalyptic fascist world coup."
Apr 19, 2024
This is a developing story... Please check back for possible updates...
Law enforcement officials confirmed to CNN that someone lit themself on fire outside the New York City courthouse where former President Donald Trump, the presumptive Republican nominee, is on trial for allegedly falsifying business records.
"The man walked into the park across the street from the courthouse, throwing flyers into the air," the network reported, citing law enforcement. "He then pulled something out of a backpack—it was not immediately clear what the item was—and lit himself on fire."
Journalists were in the area for the historic trial and CNN anchor Laura Coates was among those who described the scene live on-air as New York Police Department officers and emergency responders worked to extinguish the fire.
Police were "slow to respond in part because of barricades around park," Politico's Emily Ngo explained, sharing photos and videos from the scene on social media. There is "only one way to get into park outside the courthouse without jumping the fence. It's been barricaded in anticipation of protests. And since there hasn't been much in the way of protests, police presence is light. Police had to run all the way around to get to the man."
The person who self-immolated "was responsive when he was removed but he is very, very badly burned. Body charred," Ngo said.
CNN reported that the flyers featured allegations of wrongdoings against New York University and said, "NYU is a mob front."
A self-identified citizen journalist named Jack shared on social media a photo of a booklet the person reportedly left in the dirt.
An unverified Substack post says in part: "My name is Max Azzarello, and I am an investigative researcher who has set himself on fire outside of the Trump trial in Manhattan. This extreme act of protest is to draw attention to an urgent and important discovery: We are victims of a totalitarian con, and our own government (along with many of their allies) is about to hit us with an apocalyptic fascist world coup."
Inside Manhattan Criminal Court, the remaining jurors were sworn in for Trump's case, in which he faces 34 charges for records related to alleged hush money payments to cover up sex scandals during the 2016 election cycle. There are 12 jurors and six alternates.
The former president was indicted by a New York grand jury last spring. He also faces two federal criminal cases—one related to his handling of classified material and another for trying to overturn his 2020 loss, which culminated in the January 6, 2021 insurrection—as well as an election interference case in Georgia.
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Important Step': EPA Finalizes Rule to Clean Up Forever Chemical Contamination
While praising the move, campaigners also said that the agency "must require polluters to pay to clean up the entire class of thousands of toxic PFAS chemicals, and it must ban nonessential uses."
Apr 19, 2024
Environmental and public health advocates on Friday welcomed the Biden administration's latest step to tackle "forever chemicals," a new Superfund rule that "will help ensure that polluters pay to clean up their contamination" across the country.
"It is time for polluters to pay to clean up the toxic soup they've dumped into the environment," declared Erik D. Olson, senior strategic director for health at the Natural Resources Defense Council. "We all learned in kindergarten that if we make a mess, we should clean it up. The Biden administration's Superfund rule is a big step in the right direction for holding polluters accountable for cleaning up decades of contamination."
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS)—called forever chemicals because they remain in the human body and environment for long periods—have been used in products including firefighting foam, food packaging, and furniture, and tied to various health issues such as cancers, developmental and immune damage, and heart and liver problems.
"This action, coupled with EPA's recent announcement of limits on PFAS in drinking water, are critical steps in protecting the public."
As part of the Biden administration's "PFAS Strategic Roadmap," the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) rule designates perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) as hazardous substances under the Superfund law—the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act.
"President Joe Biden pledged to make PFAS a priority in 2020 as part of the Biden-Harris plan to secure environmental justice. Today the Biden EPA fulfilled this important promise," said Melanie Benesh, vice president for government affairs at the Environmental Working Group (EWG).
David Andrews, EWG's deputy director of investigations and a senior scientist, has led studies that have found that PFAS are potentially harming over 330 species and more than 200 million Americans could have PFOA and PFOS in their tap water.
"For far too long, the unchecked use and disposal of toxic PFAS have wreaked havoc on our planet, contaminating everything from our drinking water to our food supply," he noted. "Urgent action is needed to clean up contaminated sites, eliminate future release of these pollutants, and shield people from additional exposure."
Walter Mugdan, a volunteer with the Environmental Protection Network and the former Superfund director for EPA Region 2, explained that the "landmark action will allow the agency to more strongly address PFAS contamination and expedite cleanups of these toxic forever chemicals while also ensuring that cleanup costs fall on those most responsible—the industrial polluters who continue to manufacture and use them."
"This action, coupled with EPA's recent announcement of limits on PFAS in drinking water, are critical steps in protecting the public from these harmful compounds," added the former official, referencing the first-ever national limits on forever chemicals in drinking water that the agency finalized earlier this month.
As an EWG blog post detailed in anticipation of the new rule earlier this week:
A hazardous substance designation allows the EPA to use money from its Superfund—the EPA's account for addressing this kind of contamination—to quickly jump-start cleanup at a PFOA- or PFOS-polluted site and to recover the costs from the polluters. If a company that contributed to the PFAS contamination problem refuses to cooperate, the EPA can order a cleanup anyway and fine the company if they fail to take action.
[...]
When a chemical is added to the list of hazardous substances, the EPA sets a reportable quantity. Any time a substance is released above that quantity it must be reported. By imposing reportable quantities, the EPA will get immediate information about new PFAS releases and the chance to investigate immediately and, if necessary, take actions to reduce additional exposures. This information is also shared with state or tribal and local emergency authorities, so it can reach communities more quickly.
"For years, communities that have been exposed to these chemicals have been demanding that polluters be held accountable for the harm they have created and to pay for cleanup," Safer States national director Sarah Doll highlighted. "We applaud EPA for taking this step and encourage them to take the next step and list all PFAS under the Superfund law."
Liz Hitchcock, director of Safer Chemicals Healthy Families, the federal policy program of Toxic-Free Future, similarly celebrated the EPA rule, calling it "an important step forward that will go a long way toward holding PFAS polluters accountable and beginning to clean up contaminated sites across the country."
Like Doll, she also stressed that "until we declare the full class of PFAS hazardous and prevent further pollution by ending the use of all PFAS chemicals in common products like food packaging and firefighting gear, communities will continue to pay the price with our health and tax dollars."
Mary Grant, the Public Water for All campaign director at Food & Water Watch, agreed that further action is necessary.
"Chemical companies have attempted to hide what they have long known about the dangers of PFAS, creating a widespread public health crisis in the process," Grant emphasized. "These polluters must absolutely be held accountable to pay to clean up their toxic mess."
"Today's new rules are a necessary and important step to jump start the cleanup process for two types of PFAS," she said. "While we thank the EPA for finalizing these rules, much more is necessary: The EPA must require polluters to pay to clean up the entire class of thousands of toxic PFAS chemicals, and it must ban nonessential uses of PFAS to stop the pollution in the first place."
Noting that it's not just the EPA considering forever chemicals policies, Grant called on Congress to "reject various legislative proposals to exempt for-profit companies, including the water and sewer privatization industry, from being held accountable to pay to clean up PFAS."
"It is an outrageous hypocrisy that large for-profit water corporations seek to privatize municipal water and sewer systems by touting themselves as a solution to PFAS contamination, and yet they want to carve themselves out of accountability for cleanup costs," she argued. "No corporation should have free rein to pollute."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Green Groups Slam RFK Jr. as 'Dangerous Conspiracy Theorist and Science Denier'
"With so much at stake, we stand united in denouncing RFK Jr.'s false environmentalist claims."
Apr 19, 2024
A dozen national green groups on Friday published an open letter exposing what they say are the dangers of Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s quixotic Independent U.S. presidential bid by highlighting his embrace of conspiracy theories and his use of language often spoken by climate deniers.
"Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is not an environmentalist. He is a dangerous conspiracy theorist and science denier whose agenda would be a disaster for our communities and the planet," the letter argues. "He may have once been an environmental attorney, but now RFK Jr. is peddling the term 'climate change orthodoxy' and making empty promises to clean up our environment with superficial proposals."
"The truth is, by rejecting science, what he offers is no different than Donald Trump," the signers asserted, referring to the former Republican president and presumptive 2024 GOP nominee.
The letter continues:
In the fact-free world that both he and Trump live in, objective reality simply does not exist. Their policy platforms are instead driven by what will benefit Big Oil and the greedy corporations that fund them. We know, however, that environmental progress depends on following scientific fact and putting people over politics.
With so much at stake, we stand united in denouncing RFK Jr.'s false environmentalist claims. We can't, in good conscience, let him continue co-opting the credibility and successes of our movement for his own personal benefit.
"RFK Jr. is a bleak reminder that our democracy is incredibly vulnerable," the letter adds. "Any support for this Kennedy-in-name-only will inevitably result in a second Trump term and the complete erosion of vital environmental and social gains made to date."
The letter is signed by the Center for Biological Diversity Action Fund, Friends of the Earth Action, LCV Victory Fund, Natural Resources Defense Council Action Fund, Climate Emergency Advocates, Climate Power, Earthjustice Action, Food & Water Action, NextGen America, Sierra Club Independent Action, Sunrise Movement, and 350 Action.
Earlier this month, the Kennedy campaign fired New York state director Rita Palma after she admitted that her "No. 1 priority" is to siphon votes from President Joe Biden—who she described as the "mutual enemy" of both the Kennedy and Trump voter.
Last month, More Perfect Unionreleased a video highlighting the ultrawealthy Republican donors and Trump backers who are also financing Kennedy's White House run, which many observers believe could play spoiler to Biden's reelection bid.
In a stinging rebuke, prominent members of the Kennedy political dynasty reaffirmed their support for Biden on Thursday. Numerous relatives have been urging Kennedy to drop out of the race.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular