April, 08 2010, 12:51pm EDT
Broad Coalition Urges Congress to Oppose Thomson Prison If Used for Indefinite or Military Commission Detention
Guantánamo Policies Should End and Not Be Moved on Shore
WASHINGTON
A broad coalition
of human rights, religious and civil liberties groups sent a memorandum
to the House and Senate today urging members to oppose legislation
authorizing, or appropriating federal funds for, the purchase of the
Thomson Correctional Center in Thomson, Illinois unless Congress
specifically bans indefinite detention at the facility.
The Obama
administration announced in December that it was planning to purchase
the facility for the purpose of holding some of the detainees that
currently remain at Guantanamo.
The administration indicated that some detainees might be held for
military commission proceedings in Illinois while others might be held
at Thomson indefinitely without charge or trial. According to the
administration, detainees charged, tried or sentenced in federal
criminal court would not go to Thomson and any detainees cleared for
release would remain at Guantanamo until transferred to other countries.
The administration has stated that it has the ability to hold some
detainees indefinitely without charge or trial under the Authorization
for Use of Military Force passed by Congress in 2001.
In its
letter to Congress, the coalition stated, "Congress should not
authorize, or appropriate money for the acquisition of the Thomson
prison unless it also enacts a permanent statutory provision that would
ensure that the Thomson prison will not become a U.S.-based prison
dedicated to perpetuating Guantanamo policies that should end."
Below is the full text of the
memorandum and a full list of signatories:
TO:
Members of the U.S. Senate
Members
of the U.S. House of Representatives
FROM:
Alliance for Justice
American
Civil Liberties Union
Amnesty
International USA
Center for Constitutional Rights
Japanese
American Citizens League
National
Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers
Physicians
for Human Rights
United
Methodist Church, General Board of Church and Society
DATE:
April 8, 2010
RE:
Opposition to the
Purchase of the Thomson Correctional Center in Thomson, Illinois-Unless
Congress Also Enacts a Permanent, Statutory Ban on Using the Thomson
Prison for Indefinitely Detaining Persons Without Charge or Trial, or
for Holding Persons During Military Commission Trials or for Serving
Sentences Imposed by Military Commissions
We urge you to oppose legislation authorizing, or appropriating federal
funds for, the purchase of the Thomson Correctional Center in Thomson,
Illinois, unless Congress, at the same time, also enacts a
permanent, statutory ban on using the Thomson prison for indefinitely
detaining persons without charge or trial, or for holding persons during
military commission trials or for serving sentences imposed by military
commissions. All of our organizations strongly support the responsible
closing of the Guantanamo Bay detention facility, and we would support
using the Thomson facility for holding any detainees now at Guantanamo
who may be charged, tried, or sentenced in federal criminal
court. However, we strongly oppose transporting the worst of Guantanamo
policies-indefinite detention without charge or trial and military
commissions-to a prison within the United States itself. If used for one
or both of these purposes, the purchase of the Thomson prison could
result in institutionalizing and perpetuating policies that should
instead end.
On December 15, 2009, President Obama signed a memorandum directing the
Attorney General and Secretary of Defense to acquire and activate the
Thomson prison for use by the Department of Defense in holding detainees
currently at the Guantanamo Bay Naval Base and by the Department of
Justice's Bureau of Prisons as a federal penitentiary for holding
prisoners in high security, maximum security conditions. According to a
study by the Council of Economic Advisers last year, the Defense
Department would control 400 of the 1600 cells at the Thomson
prison. The Bureau of Prisons would control the remaining cells.
On December 15, a number of government officials provided further
details on who would be, and who would not be, held in the portion of
the Thomson prison designated for use by the Defense Department. In a
letter and accompanying questions and answers from the Deputy Secretary
of Defense to Congressman Mark Kirk, the Defense Department stated that
the Thomson prison would be used to imprison Guantanamo detainees whom
the government is indefinitely detaining without charge or trial under a
claim of detention authority based on the 2001 Authorization for Use of
Military Force, and also Guantanamo detainees tried before military
commissions or serving sentences imposed by military
commissions. However, the Deputy Secretary's answer to Congressman
Kirk's questions stated that Guantanamo detainees charged and tried
before federal criminal courts would not be housed at the Thomson
prison. Further, in a briefing by a "senior administration official" on
December 15, the official stated that Guantanamo detainees cleared for
release would remain at Guantanamo until transferred to other countries,
and would not go to Thomson.
There is a right way and a wrong way to close Guantanamo. To date, many
of the steps the Obama Administration has taken-with the support of
many members of Congress, including prominent congressional supporters
of the Thomson purchase-have been in the direction of closing
Guantanamothe right way. The Obama Administration has worked hard to
make charging decisions for detainees whom the government believes
should be prosecuted in federal criminal courts in the United States,
has closely collaborated with important allies of the United States in
repatriating and resettling detainees cleared for release, and has
continued the process of clearing detainees for release or transfer. The
Obama Administration should continue all of these steps until the
population at Guantanamo reaches zero.
However, there are two developments over the past year that constitute
closing Guantanamo the wrong way. First, the government has reinstituted
the discredited military commissions. The military commissions have now
gone through eight years, two statutes, four sets of rules, but have
only resulted in three convictions, with two of those convicted
detainees now released. By contrast, more than 400 defendants have been
convicted of terrorism-related offense in federal criminal courts. The
military commissions still do not have any rules based on the new
statute, continue to have fundamental problems that could result in
their proceedings being held illegal under the Constitution and
international law, and deservedly lack credibility both at home and
abroad. Second, the government continues to claim authority to
indefinitely detain without charge or trial some of the Guantanamo
detainees. Even if there is legal authority to continue to indefinitely
detain these men, which many of our groups dispute, the government
should make the policy decision that the interests of the United States
are better served by either charging a detainee in federal criminal
court or repatriating or resettling the detainee.
Based on the government's own statements, it appears that the Defense
Department-run portion of the Thomson prison would house only those
Guantanamo detainees being held pursuant to Guantanamo policies that
should end-namely, military commissions and indefinite detention without
charge or trial. Congress should not authorize, or appropriate money
for the acquisition of the Thomson prison unless it also enacts a
permanent statutory provision that would ensure that the Thomson prison
will not become a U.S.-based prison dedicated to perpetuating Guantanamo
policies that should end.
Bringing the practice of indefinite detention without charge or trial
to any location within the United States will further harm the rule of
law and adherence to the Constitution. Shortly after President Obama
took office, the government prosecuted and convicted, in federal
criminal court, the only person then-held on U.S. soil indefinitely
without charge or trial. At present, the number of people held within
the U.S. itself indefinitely without charge or trial is zero. However,
if the Thomson prison is acquired and the current statutory prohibition
on transferring Guantanamo detainees for purposes other than
prosecution is allowed to expire, the number of persons held on U.S.
soil without charge or trial could reportedly rise to 50 or more.
Moreover, Thomson could eventually become the
place to send other persons held indefinitely without charge or
trial-with the prospect of detainees being transferred there from
Bagram, Afghanistan or new captures brought from other locations around
the globe. The unfortunate reality that we would face if Thomson opens
is that it is easier to go from 50 to 100 indefinite detention prisoners
than it is to go from 0 to 1. Once the indefinite detention policy is
institutionalized at Thomson, it will be difficult to hold the line at
former Guantanamo detainees.
We urge that you oppose the purchase of the Thomson prison unless
Congress, at the same time that it authorizes or funds the purchase,
also enacts a permanent, statutory ban on using the Thomson facility for
indefinite detention without charge or trial or for military
commission-related detention. The current statutory ban on transferring
detainees to the United States for purposes of indefinite detention
without charge or trial expires at the end of the current fiscal
year. Congress should not move forward with the Thomson purchase until
and unless it permanently prohibits indefinite detention and military
commission-related detention at the Thomson facility.
We would be very interested in meeting with you or your staff to
discuss this issue further.
The American Civil Liberties Union was founded in 1920 and is our nation's guardian of liberty. The ACLU works in the courts, legislatures and communities to defend and preserve the individual rights and liberties guaranteed to all people in this country by the Constitution and laws of the United States.
(212) 549-2666LATEST NEWS
Amid Spying Fight, House Passes Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act
"As FANFSA and the 702 reauthorization move to the Senate, lawmakers in that chamber need to take a stand for the rights of people in the United States," said one advocate.
Apr 17, 2024
While applauding the U.S. House of Representatives' bipartisan passage of a bill to ensure that "law enforcement and intelligence agencies can't do an end-run around the Constitution by buying information from data brokers" on Wednesday, privacy advocates highlighted that Congress is trying to extend and expand a long-abused government spying program.
The House voted 219-199 for Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act (FANFSA), which won support from 96 Democrats and 123 Republicans, including the lead sponsor, Rep. Warren Davidson (R-Ohio). Named for the constitutional amendment that protects against unreasonable searches and seizures, H.R. 4639 would close what campaigners call the data broker loophole.
"The privacy violations that flow from law enforcement entities circumventing the Fourth Amendment undermine civil liberties, free expression, and our ability to control what happens to our data," said Free Press Action policy counsel Jenna Ruddock. "These impacts affect everyone who uses digital platforms that extract our personal information any time we open a browser or visit social media and other websites—even when we go to events like demonstrations and other places with our phones revealing our locations."
"We're grateful that the House passed these vital and popular protections," she added. "The bill would prevent flagrant abuses of our privacy by government authorities in league with unscrupulous third-party data brokers. Making this legislation into law with Senate passage too would be a decisive and long-overdue action against government misuse of this clandestine business sector that traffics in our personal data for profit."
Wednesday's vote followed the House sending the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act to the Senate. H.R. 7888 would reauthorize Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), which allows for warrantless spying on noncitizens abroad but also sweeps up Americans' data.
The House notably included an amendment forcing a wide range of individuals and businesses to cooperate with government spying operations but rejected an amendment that would have added a warrant requirement to the bill, which the Senate could vote on as soon as Thursday.
Noting those decisions on the FISA reauthorization legislation, Ruddock stressed that "today's vote is a victory but follows a recent loss and ongoing threat as that Section 702 bill moves to the Senate this week too."
"As FANFSA and the 702 reauthorization move to the Senate, lawmakers in that chamber need to take a stand for the rights of people in the United States," she argued. "That means passing FANFSA and reforming Section 702 authority—and prioritizing everyone's First and Fourth Amendment rights."
Jeramie Scott, senior counsel and director of the Electronic Privacy Information Center's Project on Surveillance Oversight, also praised the House's FANFSA passage on Wednesday.
"The passage of the Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale underscores the extent to which reining in abusive warrantless surveillance is a bipartisan issue," Scott said. "We urge the Senate to take up this measure and close the data broker loophole."
Kia Hamadanchy, senior policy counsel at ACLU, similarly said Wednesday that "the bipartisan passage of this bill is a flashing warning sign to the government that if it wants our data, it must get a warrant."
Hamadanchy added that "we hope this vote puts a fire under the Senate to protect their constituents and rein in the government's warrantless surveillance of Americans, once and for all."
Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), a critic of the pending 702 bill and FANFSA's lead sponsor in the upper chamber, called the the House's Wednesday vote "a huge win for privacy" and said that "now it's time for the Senate to follow suit."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Leaked Cables Show Biden Pressuring Nations to Oppose Palestine's UN Membership
"This is the evidence that President Biden's talk about a two-state solution is nothing but idle talk," said one former Lebanese diplomat.
Apr 17, 2024
As the United Nations Security Council prepares to vote Thursday on Palestine's bid to become a full U.N. member, the Biden administration—which claims to support Palestinian statehood—is lobbying UNSC nations in an effort to wrangle enough "no" votes so that the United States can avoid resorting to a veto.
Leaked cables obtained by The Intercept show U.S. pressure on Security Council members including Malta—which currently presides over the body—and Ecuador.
While claiming that President Joe Biden backs "Palestinian aspirations for statehood," one of the cables asserts that "it remains the U.S. view that the most expeditious path toward a political horizon for the Palestinian people is in the context of a normalization agreement between Israel and its neighbors."
"We therefore urge you not to support any potential Security Council resolution recommending the admission of 'Palestine' as a U.N. member state, should such a resolution be presented to the Security Council for a decision in the coming days and weeks," the document advises.
The U.S. argument essentially is that the U.N. should not create an independent Palestinian state by fiat—even though that's precisely how the world body voted in 1947 to establish the modern state of Israel.
The renewed push for Palestine's U.N. membership comes as Israel wages a genocidal war on the Gaza Strip. The Palestinian Authority, which hasn't controlled Gaza for nearly two decades, rejected the Biden administration's requests to hold off on seeking full membership.
"We wanted the U.S. to provide a substantive alternative to U.N. recognition. They didn't," one unnamed Palestinian official toldAxios on Wednesday. "We believe full membership in the U.N. for Palestine is way overdue. We have waited more than 12 years since our initial request."
As The Intercept's Ken Klippenstein and Daniel Boguslaw noted:
Since 2011, the U.N. Security Council has rejected the Palestinian Authority's request for full member status. On April 2, the Palestinian Observer Mission to the U.N. requested that the council once again take up consideration of its membership application. According to the first State Department cable, U.N. meetings since the beginning of April suggest that Algeria, China, Guyana, Mozambique, Russia, Slovenia, Sierra Leone, and Malta support granting Palestine full membership to the U.N. It also says that France, Japan, and Korea are undecided, while the United Kingdom will likely abstain from a vote.
Along with the United States, China, France, Russia, and the United Kingdom are permanent members of the UNSC, so they also have veto power.
Ahead of Thursday's planned vote, Spain has been doing its own lobbying in Europe to build greater support for Palestinian statehood. At a joint Tuesday press conference with Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez, Slovenian Prime Minister Robert Golob said the question is "when, not if, but when is the best moment to recognize Palestine."
Belgium—which is seeking economic sanctions against Israel in response to its genocidal war on Gaza—is expected to join Spain's push for Palestinian statehood after the country's European Union presidency expires in June.
Currently, 139 of the U.N.'s 193 member states recognize Palestine as an independent state.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu—who has also claimed to support a so-called "two-state solution"—has alternately boasted about thwarting Palestinian statehood.
Critics pointed to the leaked cables as more proof of U.S. duplicity and double standards on the Israel-Palestine issue.
"This is the evidence that President Biden's talk about a two-state solution is nothing but idle talk," Massoud Maalouf, a former Lebanese ambassador to Canada, Chile, and Poland, said on social media.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Database Exposes 'Illicit Network Undermining Democracy Around the World'
Yanis Varoufakis hailed the effort as "a treasure chest of well-researched reports on how the reactionaries of the world unite."
Apr 17, 2024
"Coups. Assassinations. Riots. Detentions. Disinformation. We know the tactics that have been deployed to undermine our democracies. But who is behind them?"
Progressive International (PI) asks and answers this and other questions with an extensive new database published Wednesday that connects the dots in what the leftist group calls the "Reactionary International"—a loose global network of right-wing leaders and organizations working to subvert democratic institutions.
PI calls it an "illicit network undermining democracy around the world."
"Today is a mask-off moment for the Reactionary International and the parties, politicians, judges, journalists, foundations, think tanks, tech platforms, NGOs, activists, financiers, and entrepreneurs that comprise it," PI said.
"After a year of preparation, we finally open the doors to our new research consortium, exposing the global network of reactionary forces that corrode our democracies, destroy our planet, and drive us closer to world war," the group added.
"The twin insurrections at the U.S. Capitol in 2021 and Brasília's Three Powers Plaza in 2023 left no doubt about the international coordination of reactionary forces," PI argued. "Yet far too little is known about the entities of this network, their sources of financing, and their institutional allies operating inside our political systems."
Ultimately, PI aims to "support democratic systems to become more resilient to their insidious tactics."
From leaders like Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, and former U.S. President Donald Trump—the presumptive 2024 Republican presidential nominee—to evangelical Christian groups influencing laws in African countries criminalizing LGBTQ+ people and tech companies empowering ubiquitous state surveillance, Reactionary International is a who's-who of the world's right-wing forces.
A cursory search of the database's contents shows users can:
- Learn about Israel's NSO, Rayzone, and Team Jorge, and how a team of Tel Aviv tech entrepreneurs fuel unrest in Latin America;
- Meet the Grey Wolves, Turkey's roving death squad with links to President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan and the ethno-nationalists in his governing coalition; and
- Explore the global network of the Falun Gong, its Trump-connected media outlet The Epoch Times, and its traveling dance troupe known as Shen Yun.
Yanis Varoufakis, a PI member and secretary-general of the left-wing Democracy in Europe Movement 2025, called the database "a treasure chest of well-researched reports on how the reactionaries of the world unite."
PI invites the public to contribute to the database.
"Together, we will not only name, shame, and expose the forces of the far right—but also dismantle their network of complicity," the group said.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular