Donate Today!

March 23, 2010
6:41 PM

CONTACT: Institute for Public Accuracy (IPA)

Sam Husseini, (202) 347-0020; or David Zupan, (541) 484-9167

Pressure on Israel?

WASHINGTON - March 23 - Tonight, President Obama is scheduled to meet with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. On Monday, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Netanyahu were among the speakers at the annual conference of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee.

Professor of history and international relations at Boston University, Bacevich is an author whose latest book is The Limits of Power: The End of American Exceptionalism.

He recently wrote the piece "How Petraeus could swing thinking on Israel: His belated recognition that U.S. and Israeli interests aren't always intertwined has particular impact," which states: "How long the United States can tolerate the denial of Palestinian self-determination is one question demanding urgent attention. Yet behind that question there lurks an even larger one: Is the progressive militarization of U.S. policy in the Greater Middle East -- entrusting ever more authority to proconsuls like Gen. Petraeus and flooding the region with American troops -- contributing to peace and stability? Or is it producing precisely the opposite result?"

Abileah is a national organizer with CODEPINK and a Jewish-American of Israeli descent who interrupted Netanyahu's remarks Monday night. See: "CODEPINK Protests Netanyahu inside AIPAC Gala: Activists call for end to siege on Gaza and illegal settlements."

Earlier Monday, a spoof news release distributed by CODEPINK, saying that AIPAC had called for an Israeli settlement freeze, was reported as fact by NPR and other major media.

Bennis is a fellow at the Institute for Policy Studies. Her books include Understanding the Palestinian-Israeli Conflict: A Primer. Bennis said today: "Despite a campaign commitment to making a two-state solution real, which would require real pressure to make Israel comply with international law, the Obama administration's policy towards settlements has largely been limited to a series of polite requests of Israel. Request: 'Please freeze settlements.' Answer: 'No.' 'Please freeze settlements.' Answer: 'No.' 'Please freeze just a few settlements.' Answer: 'No.' 'Please freeze just a few settlements, just for a little while.' Answer: 'Maybe ... well ... no.' Then they stopped asking.

"Someone seems to have told the Obama administration that a series of polite requests equals pressure. It doesn't. Real pressure looks like this: 'Please stop settlements.' Answer: 'No.' 'Then, you know that $30 billion that Bush arranged for you from U.S. tax money, and we agreed to pay -- you can kiss that goodbye.' That's what pressure looks like."

A nationwide consortium, the Institute for Public Accuracy (IPA) represents an unprecedented effort to bring other voices to the mass-media table often dominated by a few major think tanks. IPA works to broaden public discourse in mainstream media, while building communication with alternative media outlets and grassroots activists.

Comments are closed

2 Comments so far

Show All


Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...