February, 10 2010, 10:15am EDT
Whole Foods, Bed, Bath & Beyond Reject Tar Sands
New guidelines affect refineries supplied by Canada’s Tar Sands
WASHINGTON
Whole Foods Market (NASDAQ: WFMI) today announced its commitment to
stop buying transportation fuel linked to Canada's Tar Sands. Bed Bath
& Beyond (NASDAQ: BBBY) also released its new policy encouraging
transportation providers to avoid high impact fuels such as those from
refineries using Tar Sands.
Whole Foods and Bed Bath &
Beyond are the first companies to publicly reject the Tar Sands since
ForestEthics launched its US Tar Sands campaign in July 2009. The toxic
air and water pollution, deforestation and human health hazards
associated with the Tar Sands have alarmed corporate consumers such as
the Fortune 500. These companies represent a large part of US demand
for transportation fuel, the primary end-use for Tar Sands oil.
"Today's
announcement ends the Tar Sands industry's hallucination that consumers
have no choice but to blindly purchase their fuel, even with its
nightmare environmental price tag," said ForestEthics Executive
Director Todd Paglia. "Whole Foods and Bed, Bath and Beyond have
confirmed that Canada's dirty Tar Sands oil represents a brand risk too
great to ignore."
Tar Sands oil production generates 3-5 times
the greenhouse gas emissions of conventional oil production.
Production of Tar Sands oil destroys fresh drinking water, pollutes the
air, and razes North America's ecologically critical Boreal Forests.
Communities downstream of Tar Sands projects are facing elevated levels
of cancer. Tar Sands sludge, extracted primarily in the province of
Alberta, cannot be made clean by technological solutions.
"At
Whole Foods Market, we demonstrate our commitment to our communities
and the environment in many ways, including supporting sustainable food
production, purchasing wind renewable energy credits (some of the
largest by a single buyer in the US), and our commitment to green
building and reducing our energy consumption at our stores and
facilities," said Michael Besancon, senior global vice president of
purchasing, distribution and marketing for Whole Foods Market. "Fuel
that comes from Tar Sands refineries does not fit our values."
To
back up its new position, Whole Foods eliminated Tar Sands-linked fuel
at one of its distribution centers and committed to work with
ForestEthics and others to replace all fuel supplies connected with
Canada's Tar Sands.
Bed Bath & Beyond has agreed to make the
Tar Sands an issue in the bidding process it follows for selecting
transportation providers. This provides a competitive opportunity for
providers that can demonstrate their commitment to fuels with lower
well-tank carbon emissions and lower overall environmental and social
impacts.
In July 2009, ForestEthics sent letters to over a
hundred Fortune 500 companies, warning that continued use of
transportation and fuels linked to Canada's Tar Sands puts their brands
at risk. Citing the growing public controversy about the environmental
and social costs of fuels from Tar Sands oil, the letters offer the
group's expertise to help companies avoid these fuels. ForestEthics
also warned that a public campaign could be launched against any
company that does not act to eliminate such fuels from their
operations.
Founded in 2000, ForestEthics is a nonprofit environmental organization with staff in Canada, the United States and Chile. Our mission is to protect Endangered Forests and wild places, wildlife, and human wellbeing--one of our focus areas is climate change, which compromises all of our efforts if left unchecked. We catalyze environmental leadership among industry, governments and communities by running hard-hitting and highly effective campaigns that leverage public dialogue and pressure to achieve our goals.
LATEST NEWS
'People of Gaza Need a Cease-Fire,' Medical Aid Leader Tells UN Security Council
"This body has failed to effectively address this conflict. We have watched members of this council deliberate and delay while civilians die."
Feb 22, 2024
The head of a leading international humanitarian group on Thursday implored the United Nations Security Council to work out an immediate cease-fire in Gaza, where more than 100,000 Palestinians have been killed or maimed by Israeli bombs and bullets, around 90% of the strip's 2.3 million people are forcibly displaced, and famine is a growing reality.
"Meeting after meeting, resolution after resolution, this body has failed to effectively address this conflict," Doctors Without Borders/Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) secretary general Christopher Lockyear told the Security Council in New York City. "We have watched members of this council deliberate and delay while civilians die."
"Every day, we witness unimaginable horror."
"This death, destruction, and forced displacement are the result of military and political choices that blatantly disregard civilian lives," he said. "These choices could have been—and still can be—made very differently."
Lockyear's remarks came just two days after the United States vetoed a Security Council cease-fire resolution for the third time since Israeli forces began bombarding Gaza following the October 7 Hamas-led attacks on Israel.
"We are appalled by the willingness of the United States to use its powers as a permanent council member to obstruct efforts to adopt the most evident of resolutions: one demanding an immediate and sustained cease-fire," Lockyear said.
In addition to diplomatic support that includes testifying against South Africa-led allegations of Israeli genocide at the International Court of Justice, the Biden administration is leading an effort to send more than $14 billion in additional military aid to Israel atop the nearly $4 billion it already receives each year from Washington.
Biden has also twice bypassed Congress to fast-track armed aid to Israel, even as reports emerge of war crimes including the torture, rape, and execution of men, women, children, and elders. Many of the victims are medical professionals.
"Every day, we witness unimaginable horror," Lockyear told the council. "As I speak, more than 1.5 million people are trapped in Rafah. We live in fear of a ground invasion."
"Our fears are rooted in experience," he said. "Just 48 hours ago, as a family sat around their kitchen table in a house sheltering MSF staff and their families in Khan Younis, a 120mm tank shell exploded through the walls, igniting a fire, and killing two people and severely burning six others. Five of the six injured are women and children."
"We took every precaution to protect the 64 humanitarian staff and family members from such an attack by notifying warring parties of the location and clearly marking the building with an MSF flag," Lockyear noted. "Despite our precautions, our building was struck not only by a tank shell but by intense gunfire. Some were trapped in the burning building while active shooting delayed ambulances from reaching them. This morning I am looking at photos that show the catastrophic extent of the damage and I am watching videos of rescue teams removing the charred bodies from the rubble."
"This is all too familiar—Israeli forces have attacked our convoys, detained our staff, and bulldozed our vehicles, hospitals have been bombed and raided," he said. "Now, for a second time, one of our staff shelters has been hit. This pattern of attacks is either intentional or indicative of reckless incompetence. Our colleagues in Gaza are fearful that, as I speak to you today, they will be punished tomorrow."
Lockyear continued:
For 138 days, we have witnessed the unimaginable suffering of the people of Gaza.
For 138 days, we have done everything we can to enact a meaningful humanitarian response.
For 138 days, we have watched the systematic obliteration of a health system we have supported for decades. We have watched our patients and colleagues be killed and maimed.
This situation is the culmination of a war Israel is waging on the entire population of the Gaza Strip—a war of collective punishment.
A war without rules.
A war at all costs.
"The consequences of casting international humanitarian law to the wind will reverberate well beyond Gaza," said Lockyear. "It will be an enduring burden on our collective conscience. This is not just political inaction—it has become political complicity."
Lockyear then took aim at the recent U.S. calls for a "temporary cease-fire" to be implemented "as soon as practicable."
"A new draft resolution by the United States ostensibly calls for a cease-fire," he said. "However, this is misleading at best. This council should reject any resolution that further hampers humanitarian efforts on the ground and leads this Council to tacitly endorse the continued violence and mass atrocities in Gaza."
"The people of Gaza need a cease-fire not when 'practicable,' but now," Lockyear stressed. "They need a sustained cease-fire, not a 'temporary period of calm.' Anything short of this is gross negligence."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Planned Parenthood Asks Wisconsin Supreme Court to Affirm Abortion Rights
"Wisconsinites deserve the ability to make decisions that shape their future—to make decisions about if or when they become a parent. And they deserve to know this right is protected by our state constitution."
Feb 22, 2024
Continuing a legal battle that began with the nationwide reversal of Roe v. Wade in June 2022, Planned Parenthood on Thursday filed a petition urging the liberal-controlled Wisconsin Supreme Court to swiftly protect the right to abortion.
"We're asking the Wisconsin Supreme Court to answer this question: Does the Wisconsin Constitution protect the right to access abortion care and a provider's right to provide abortion care?" Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin (PPWI) president and CEO Tanya Atkinson explained in a video shared on social media.
"Wisconsinites deserve the ability to make decisions that shape their future—to make decisions about if or when they become a parent," she stressed. "And they deserve to know this right is protected by our state constitution."
According to the Wisconsin State Journal:
The lawsuit asks the high court to declare that abortion rights are protected in the constitutional provision stating, "All people are born equally free and independent, and have certain inherent rights; among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness."
"At the sacred core of the inherent right to life and liberty lies the right to determine what one does with one's own body, including whether and when to have a child," the lawsuit states.
The lawsuit doesn't seek to define when exactly abortion rights are guaranteed.
Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin has clinics that offer abortion care in Dane, Milwaukee, and Sheboygan counties. However, after the U.S. Supreme Court's right-wing majority overturned Roe in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, PPWI stopped providing abortions due to uncertainty over an 1849 state law.
PPWI decided to resume abortion care last September, in response to Dane County Judge Diane Schlipper's July ruling that the law only applies to feticide, or the act of killing a fetus, and not consensual pre-viability abortion. Joel Urmanski, Sheboygan County's Republican district attorney, asked Schlipper to reconsider her decision, but she reaffirmed it in December.
Urmanski on Tuesday asked the state's top court to bypass the appellate level and weigh in. In response, PPWI chief strategy officer Michelle Velasquez said in a statement that the group "vehemently opposes" his view that the 175-year-old law took effect upon Roe's reversal but "we do agree with DA Urmanski that bypass to the Wisconsin Supreme Court is appropriate, as this issue is of statewide importance and that requiring this case to be first decided by the Court of Appeals will only result in needless delay."
"Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin will continue to provide abortion care services at our Water Street Health Center in Milwaukee, Madison East Health Center, and Sheboygan Health Center," Velasquez added. "We will continue essential work to help protect and expand reproductive freedom in Wisconsin so that everyone who needs comprehensive reproductive healthcare in our state can get the nonjudgmental and compassionate care they deserve."
If the Wisconsin Supreme Court takes up the issue, its four liberal members are expected to affirm abortion rights, a key topic that led voters to end right-wing control of the court last April by electing Justice Janet Protasiewicz. However, even if the justices rule as anticipated, GOP state lawmakers across the country have ramped up efforts to restrict reproductive freedom since Dobbs.
Republicans in the Wisconsin State Assembly last month approved a bill that—if also passed by the Senate—could lead to a statewide referendum in the April election asking voters whether to ban abortion after 14 weeks of pregnancy. However, Democratic Gov. Tony Evers has vowed to veto the measure, which would block it from the ballot.
After the January vote, Jon McCray Jones, a policy analyst at the ACLU of Wisconsin, toldtheGrio that already, "1 in 5 patients are now traveling out of state for abortion care," and a new ban would exacerbate challenges faced by marginalized communities.
Residents now deal with "healthcare deserts," because "many young people who are graduating from residency are opting to go into states that have linear abortion laws," Jones said, arguing that "politicians need to stay out of the uteruses of Wisconsinites."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Campaigners Applaud UK Exit From 'Climate-Wrecking' Energy Charter Treaty
"The Energy Charter Treaty was a major barrier to the progress of a just transition," said one climate action group. "Good riddance!"
Feb 22, 2024
The United Kingdom's decision to exit a 30-year-old fossil fuel-friendly treaty will "untie a straitjacket" on the country's ability to ensure a just transition toward renewable energy, said one campaign group on Thursday.
Officials announced that after two years of negotiations regarding a modernization of the 1994 Energy Charter Treaty (ECT)—which allows fossil fuel companies to sue governments over profits lost due to climate policies that reduce the use of coal, oil, and gas—the U.K. will leave the treaty due to a stalemate.
The U.K., which plans to achieve net-zero fossil fuel emissions by 2050, helped broker a deal in 2022 that would have included protections for a transition to renewable energy sources while maintaining the ECT's investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) mechanism, which permits the fossil fuel lawsuits.
"The Energy Charter Treaty is outdated and in urgent need of reform, but talks have stalled and sensible renewal looks increasingly unlikely," said Graham Stuart, the energy security and net zero minister for the U.K. "Remaining a member would not support our transition to cleaner, cheaper energy, and could even penalize us for our world-leading efforts to deliver net zero."
Social justice group Global Justice Now noted that Britons "up and down the country have campaigned tirelessly" to end the U.K.'s participation in the treaty.
"Huge congratulations to all the campaigners who have pushed so hard for this for so long," added Fossil Free Parliament. "The Energy Charter Treaty was a major barrier to the progress of a just transition. Good riddance!"
An estimated 60% of decisions by tribunals set up by the ECT favor fossil fuel companies, and the treaty has allowed energy companies to sue the Netherlands for $2.6 billion to compensate for their losses stemming from the Dutch government's planned coal phaseout. A U.K. company also sued Italy for $237 million for banning it from drilling an oil field in the Adriatic Sea.
"The ECT is now a dead man walking, and only those profiting from the destruction of our planet will mourn its passing," said Cleodie Rickard, trade campaigns manager for Global Justice Now. "However, the mechanism in the ECT which made it so deadly—the investor-state dispute settlement provisions—lives on in a number of other treaties... With ISDS's legitimacy crumbling, now is the time to scrap this system."
The U.K.'s decision comes three months after more than 200 civil society groups called on U.S. President Joe Biden to dismantle the ISDS mechanism within the Americas Partnership for Economic Prosperity (APEP), a trade agreement between the U.S. and 11 countries in Central and South America and the Caribbean.
Nine E.U. member states have recently withdrawn from the ECT, including France, Spain, and the Netherlands.
On Tuesday, E.U. energy ministers held a technical meeting on a proposal for all 27 member states to exit the treaty en masse; an agreement could be reached on the plan by next month.
"As it stands, the treaty is not in line with the E.U.'s energy and climate goals and with the E.U.'s investment policy and law," a spokesperson for the European Commission toldThe Guardian. "Despite the commission's successful negotiating efforts with international partners to update the treaty, it was not possible for member states to find the necessary majority to approve the modernized treaty. We therefore proposed that the E.U., its member states, and Euratom withdraw from the ECT in a coordinated and orderly manner."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular