September, 09 2009, 03:56pm EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Jenny Harbine, Earthjustice, (406) 586-9699
Suzanne Asha Stone, Defenders of Wildlife, (208) 861-4655
Louisa Willcox, Natural Resources Defense Council, (406) 222-9561
Melanie Stein, Sierra Club, (307) 733-4557
Noah Greenwald, Center for Biological Diversity, (503) 484-7495
Court Finds Wolf Delisting is Likely Unlawful; Declines to Stop Wolf Hunts
MISSOULA, Montana
Late Tuesday evening, a federal district court issued an order finding that the delisting of wolves
in the northern Rockies was likely illegal, but declined to stop wolf
hunts in Idaho and Montana. In the ruling, the court stated that the
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's decision to remove protections from
wolves in Idaho and Montana while retaining protections for Wyoming
wolves appeared to be "a practical determination that does not seem to
be scientifically based."
The court order came
in an ongoing lawsuit seeking to restore federal Endangered Species Act
protections to wolves in the northern Rocky Mountains until wolf
numbers are stronger, the states develop an adequate legal safety net,
and connectivity between recovery areas is ensured. The order came just
over a week after Idaho's wolf-hunting season opened on September 1 in
two of the state's 12 hunting units. Montana is set to begin wolf
hunting on September 15.
Idaho
authorized the killing of 220 wolves in a wolf hunt, which represents
25 percent of the last official Idaho wolf population estimate at the
end of December 2008. Montana has authorized the take of 75 wolves in a
wolf hunt, which is 15 percent of its last official wolf population
estimate.
The court declined to stop the hunts
because it held that a single hunting season at these levels in Idaho
and Montana would not "irreparably harm" the wolf population as a
whole.
The wolf hunting is in addition to wolf
killing due to livestock conflicts, defense-of-property wolf killing,
and natural mortality, which last year accounted for more than 200 wolf
deaths in Idaho and Montana. The hunting would occur throughout the
states, including in core wilderness regions where wolves have
virtually no conflicts with livestock. The combined loss of all these
wolves threatens the recovery of the still-vulnerable regional wolf
population in the northern Rockies.
Under the
challenged U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service wolf delisting rule, Idaho
and Montana are free to reduce the wolf population down to 150 per
state - a potential loss of roughly two-thirds of the region's wolves.
No other endangered species has ever been delisted at such a low
population level and then immediately hunted to even lower,
unsustainable levels.
The wolf hunts threaten to
cripple the regional wolf population by isolating wolves into
disconnected subgroups incapable of genetic or ecological
sustainability. The wolf hunts would also allow the killing of the
breeding alpha male and female wolves, thereby disrupting the social
group, leaving pups more vulnerable.
Wolves are
still under federal protection in Wyoming because a federal court
previously ruled that Wyoming's hostile wolf-management scheme leaves
wolves in "serious jeopardy." The Fish and Wildlife Service in the
recent past held that a state-by-state approach to delisting wolves was
not permitted under the Endangered Species Act, but the federal
government flip-flopped on its earlier position and this year took
wolves in Idaho and Montana off the endangered species list while
leaving those in Wyoming on the list.
In addition to Wyoming,
the states of Idaho and Montana have refused to make enforceable
commitments to maintain viable wolf populations within their borders.
Earthjustice
represents Defenders of Wildlife, Natural Resources Defense Council,
Sierra Club, Center for Biological Diversity, The Humane Society of the
United States, Jackson Hole Conservation Alliance, Friends of the
Clearwater, Alliance for the Wild Rockies, Oregon Wild, Cascadia
Wildlands, Western Watersheds Project, Wildlands Network, and Hells
Canyon Preservation Council.
###
"We're
disappointed that wolves will continue to be hunted in the short term,
but we're very encouraged that the court has expressed agreement that
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service acted illegally by delisting wolves
under the current rule." Suzanne Stone, Northern Rockies representative of Defenders of Wildlife
"In the big picture, this is a win," said Louisa Willcox, senior wildlife advocate at NRDC.
"We feel good about the judge's analysis of the merits of our case. The
Department of Interior has clearly missed an opportunity to get this
right. We need a national wolf recovery plan and this piecemeal effort
just won't get us there."
"We are encouraged by the
fact that Judge Molloy agrees that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
violated the Endangered Species Act when removing protections for
wolves. However, we are disheartened that public hunting will be
allowed to continue in Idaho and Montana this fall. Wolves are at the
brink of recovery in the northern Rockies and we believe a public hunt
is premature and could negatively impact their chance to make a full
recovery." Melanie Stein, Sierra Club representative
"Today's
order affirms that removal of protections for wolves in the northern
Rockies before they have fully recovered was illegal," said Noah Greenwald, endangered species program director with the Center for Biological Diversity. "Although the court's decision to leave wolves unprotected is a setback for recovery, we hope it is a temporary one."
"Here in Oregon, we just had two young wolves killed after conflicts with livestock," said Rob Klavins with the conservation group Oregon Wild.
"The last thing our neighbors need to be doing is shooting these still
recovering animals for sport. We hope that the state-sponsored hunts
can be ended soon and recovery can begin once again."
"In
keeping with Judge Molloy's findings in this Order, WWP looks forward
to the overturning of the delisting of wolves in the northern Rockies
and the ending of hunting of wolves," said Jon Marvel, executive director of Western Watersheds Project.
"Today's ruling is a split decision," said Doug Honnold of Earthjustice,
who represents the conservation groups in the wolf-delisting lawsuit.
"We are glad the court agreed with us that the Fish and Wildlife
Service violated the Endangered Species Act. We are deeply saddened by
the fact that the court decided not to stop the Idaho and Montana wolf
hunts this year."
LATEST NEWS
Amid Spying Fight, House Passes Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act
"As FANFSA and the 702 reauthorization move to the Senate, lawmakers in that chamber need to take a stand for the rights of people in the United States," said one advocate.
Apr 17, 2024
While applauding the U.S. House of Representatives' bipartisan passage of a bill to ensure that "law enforcement and intelligence agencies can't do an end-run around the Constitution by buying information from data brokers" on Wednesday, privacy advocates highlighted that Congress is trying to extend and expand a long-abused government spying program.
The House voted 219-199 for Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act (FANFSA), which won support from 96 Democrats and 123 Republicans, including the lead sponsor, Rep. Warren Davidson (R-Ohio). Named for the constitutional amendment that protects against unreasonable searches and seizures, H.R. 4639 would close what campaigners call the data broker loophole.
"The privacy violations that flow from law enforcement entities circumventing the Fourth Amendment undermine civil liberties, free expression, and our ability to control what happens to our data," said Free Press Action policy counsel Jenna Ruddock. "These impacts affect everyone who uses digital platforms that extract our personal information any time we open a browser or visit social media and other websites—even when we go to events like demonstrations and other places with our phones revealing our locations."
"We're grateful that the House passed these vital and popular protections," she added. "The bill would prevent flagrant abuses of our privacy by government authorities in league with unscrupulous third-party data brokers. Making this legislation into law with Senate passage too would be a decisive and long-overdue action against government misuse of this clandestine business sector that traffics in our personal data for profit."
Wednesday's vote followed the House sending the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act to the Senate. H.R. 7888 would reauthorize Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), which allows for warrantless spying on noncitizens abroad but also sweeps up Americans' data.
The House notably included an amendment forcing a wide range of individuals and businesses to cooperate with government spying operations but rejected an amendment that would have added a warrant requirement to the bill, which the Senate could vote on as soon as Thursday.
Noting those decisions on the FISA reauthorization legislation, Ruddock stressed that "today's vote is a victory but follows a recent loss and ongoing threat as that Section 702 bill moves to the Senate this week too."
"As FANFSA and the 702 reauthorization move to the Senate, lawmakers in that chamber need to take a stand for the rights of people in the United States," she argued. "That means passing FANFSA and reforming Section 702 authority—and prioritizing everyone's First and Fourth Amendment rights."
Jeramie Scott, senior counsel and director of the Electronic Privacy Information Center's Project on Surveillance Oversight, also praised the House's FANFSA passage on Wednesday.
"The passage of the Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale underscores the extent to which reining in abusive warrantless surveillance is a bipartisan issue," Scott said. "We urge the Senate to take up this measure and close the data broker loophole."
Kia Hamadanchy, senior policy counsel at ACLU, similarly said Wednesday that "the bipartisan passage of this bill is a flashing warning sign to the government that if it wants our data, it must get a warrant."
Hamadanchy added that "we hope this vote puts a fire under the Senate to protect their constituents and rein in the government's warrantless surveillance of Americans, once and for all."
Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), a critic of the pending 702 bill and FANFSA's lead sponsor in the upper chamber, called the the House's Wednesday vote "a huge win for privacy" and said that "now it's time for the Senate to follow suit."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Leaked Cables Show Biden Pressuring Nations to Oppose Palestine's UN Membership
"This is the evidence that President Biden's talk about a two-state solution is nothing but idle talk," said one former Lebanese diplomat.
Apr 17, 2024
As the United Nations Security Council prepares to vote Thursday on Palestine's bid to become a full U.N. member, the Biden administration—which claims to support Palestinian statehood—is lobbying UNSC nations in an effort to wrangle enough "no" votes so that the United States can avoid resorting to a veto.
Leaked cables obtained by The Intercept show U.S. pressure on Security Council members including Malta—which currently presides over the body—and Ecuador.
While claiming that President Joe Biden backs "Palestinian aspirations for statehood," one of the cables asserts that "it remains the U.S. view that the most expeditious path toward a political horizon for the Palestinian people is in the context of a normalization agreement between Israel and its neighbors."
"We therefore urge you not to support any potential Security Council resolution recommending the admission of 'Palestine' as a U.N. member state, should such a resolution be presented to the Security Council for a decision in the coming days and weeks," the document advises.
The U.S. argument essentially is that the U.N. should not create an independent Palestinian state by fiat—even though that's precisely how the world body voted in 1947 to establish the modern state of Israel.
The renewed push for Palestine's U.N. membership comes as Israel wages a genocidal war on the Gaza Strip. The Palestinian Authority, which hasn't controlled Gaza for nearly two decades, rejected the Biden administration's requests to hold off on seeking full membership.
"We wanted the U.S. to provide a substantive alternative to U.N. recognition. They didn't," one unnamed Palestinian official toldAxios on Wednesday. "We believe full membership in the U.N. for Palestine is way overdue. We have waited more than 12 years since our initial request."
As The Intercept's Ken Klippenstein and Daniel Boguslaw noted:
Since 2011, the U.N. Security Council has rejected the Palestinian Authority's request for full member status. On April 2, the Palestinian Observer Mission to the U.N. requested that the council once again take up consideration of its membership application. According to the first State Department cable, U.N. meetings since the beginning of April suggest that Algeria, China, Guyana, Mozambique, Russia, Slovenia, Sierra Leone, and Malta support granting Palestine full membership to the U.N. It also says that France, Japan, and Korea are undecided, while the United Kingdom will likely abstain from a vote.
Along with the United States, China, France, Russia, and the United Kingdom are permanent members of the UNSC, so they also have veto power.
Ahead of Thursday's planned vote, Spain has been doing its own lobbying in Europe to build greater support for Palestinian statehood. At a joint Tuesday press conference with Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez, Slovenian Prime Minister Robert Golob said the question is "when, not if, but when is the best moment to recognize Palestine."
Belgium—which is seeking economic sanctions against Israel in response to its genocidal war on Gaza—is expected to join Spain's push for Palestinian statehood after the country's European Union presidency expires in June.
Currently, 139 of the U.N.'s 193 member states recognize Palestine as an independent state.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu—who has also claimed to support a so-called "two-state solution"—has alternately boasted about thwarting Palestinian statehood.
Critics pointed to the leaked cables as more proof of U.S. duplicity and double standards on the Israel-Palestine issue.
"This is the evidence that President Biden's talk about a two-state solution is nothing but idle talk," Massoud Maalouf, a former Lebanese ambassador to Canada, Chile, and Poland, said on social media.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Database Exposes 'Illicit Network Undermining Democracy Around the World'
Yanis Varoufakis hailed the effort as "a treasure chest of well-researched reports on how the reactionaries of the world unite."
Apr 17, 2024
"Coups. Assassinations. Riots. Detentions. Disinformation. We know the tactics that have been deployed to undermine our democracies. But who is behind them?"
Progressive International (PI) asks and answers this and other questions with an extensive new database published Wednesday that connects the dots in what the leftist group calls the "Reactionary International"—a loose global network of right-wing leaders and organizations working to subvert democratic institutions.
PI calls it an "illicit network undermining democracy around the world."
"Today is a mask-off moment for the Reactionary International and the parties, politicians, judges, journalists, foundations, think tanks, tech platforms, NGOs, activists, financiers, and entrepreneurs that comprise it," PI said.
"After a year of preparation, we finally open the doors to our new research consortium, exposing the global network of reactionary forces that corrode our democracies, destroy our planet, and drive us closer to world war," the group added.
"The twin insurrections at the U.S. Capitol in 2021 and BrasÃlia's Three Powers Plaza in 2023 left no doubt about the international coordination of reactionary forces," PI argued. "Yet far too little is known about the entities of this network, their sources of financing, and their institutional allies operating inside our political systems."
Ultimately, PI aims to "support democratic systems to become more resilient to their insidious tactics."
From leaders like Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, and former U.S. President Donald Trump—the presumptive 2024 Republican presidential nominee—to evangelical Christian groups influencing laws in African countries criminalizing LGBTQ+ people and tech companies empowering ubiquitous state surveillance, Reactionary International is a who's-who of the world's right-wing forces.
A cursory search of the database's contents shows users can:
- Learn about Israel's NSO, Rayzone, and Team Jorge, and how a team of Tel Aviv tech entrepreneurs fuel unrest in Latin America;
- Meet the Grey Wolves, Turkey's roving death squad with links to President Recep Tayyip ErdoÄŸan and the ethno-nationalists in his governing coalition; and
- Explore the global network of the Falun Gong, its Trump-connected media outlet The Epoch Times, and its traveling dance troupe known as Shen Yun.
Yanis Varoufakis, a PI member and secretary-general of the left-wing Democracy in Europe Movement 2025, called the database "a treasure chest of well-researched reports on how the reactionaries of the world unite."
PI invites the public to contribute to the database.
"Together, we will not only name, shame, and expose the forces of the far right—but also dismantle their network of complicity," the group said.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular