Workers with East Bay Municipal Utility District (EBMUD) stack water pipes before being installed on April 22, 2021 in Walnut Creek, California. (Photo: Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)
Jul 01, 2021
A number of progressive advocacy groups welcomed as a critical step forward the U.S. House's Thursday approval of a water and transportation infrastructure bill, the INVEST in America Act.
"This act is the real clean transportation and water plan people in our country deserve," said Deron Lovaas, a senior policy advocate in NRDC's Healthy People & Thriving Communities program, calling the bill "what we need to tackle the crises of crumbling roads and bridges, unsafe water, racial inequality, and climate change."
The bill passed in a 221-201 vote, with just two Republicans joining Democrats in voting yes. The GOP's near unanimous rejection came "even though it included earmarks proposed by Republican members that would explicitly help their districts," CBS News noted.
The vote came as progressive Democrats continue to demand that the bipartisan infrastructure bill be tied to a broader reconciliation package that includes spending on safety-net programs and investments in green energy.
As CNNreported:
House Democrats say the bill--known as the INVEST in America Act--will deliver on key priorities in President Joe Biden's American Jobs Plan, and they hope the legislative text can be used to negotiate with the Senate and the White House to determine what specific policy proposals can be included as part of the recently announced bipartisan infrastructure framework.
Democratic Rep. Peter DeFazio of Oregon, the lead sponsor of the INVEST Act and chair of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, said at a news conference on Wednesday, "I'm suggesting that substantial amounts of the policy in our bill should be negotiated by the White House, and the Senate and the House to be part of that bipartisan proposal."
DeFazio introduced the bill last month, saying at the time that it would put "a core piece of President Biden's American Jobs Plan into legislative text--seizing this once-in-a-generation opportunity to move our transportation planning out of the 1950s and toward our clean energy future."
According to a fact sheet, the bill puts $343 billion towards roads, bridges, and safety, including $8.3 billion "for activities targeted to reduce carbon pollution and... $6.2 billion for mitigation and resiliency improvements"; $109 billion in transit with "record investments" to increase routes and service; $95 billion for passenger and freight rail, including a tripling of Amtrak funding; $117 billion in drinking water infrastructure and assistance. Water improvements also include "fully" replacing the nation's lead service lines and directing the Environmental Protection Agency to set national standards for PFAS and other toxins, as well as investing $51.25 million in wastewater infrastructure.
Environment America president Wendy Wendlandt called the INVEST in America Act "the approach we need to tackle today's problems, including the greatest challenge of our time: climate change."
She further welcomed the "bill's investments in clean, electric, and zero-carbon transportation options such as walking and biking" as "good news for people and the planet."
While welcoming parts of the bill, Mary Grant, the Public Water for All Campaign Director at Food & Water Watch, expressed concern that the INVEST Act's water infrastructure funding was insufficient and that the bipartisan infrastructure deal could facilitate privatization of public services including water.
"We applaud the House for its commitment to eliminate lead service lines and provide significant household water debt relief with a five-year shutoff moratorium," Grant said, referring to provision of the INVEST Act.
"This legislation offers a bolder response than the Senate's water bill," yet, she said, "the funding levels for water improvements are still not enough." Grant said it was crucial to "seize the opportunity provided by ongoing infrastructure negotiations and ensure the critical, transformative water funding the country really needs."
She suggested the Water Affordability, Transparency, Equity, and Reliability (WATER) Act be included in any infrastructure package as a way to help "provide a permanent water solution and ensure stronger, more resilient and more accessible water systems."
"Congress must reject the White House's ill-conceived bipartisan framework that would privatize water systems through public-private partnerships and asset recycling," she continued. "Our communities cannot afford that compromise on water."
For now, the manner the INVEST Act advances is unclear, Politico reported following the House vote.
"A surface transportation bill, considered must-pass legislation, will eventually be enacted in some way," the outlet noted. "But it's looking increasingly likely to be linked to broader efforts on infrastructure, which would mean an uncharted path ahead for the legislation, which has a deadline of the end of September."
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today! |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
A number of progressive advocacy groups welcomed as a critical step forward the U.S. House's Thursday approval of a water and transportation infrastructure bill, the INVEST in America Act.
"This act is the real clean transportation and water plan people in our country deserve," said Deron Lovaas, a senior policy advocate in NRDC's Healthy People & Thriving Communities program, calling the bill "what we need to tackle the crises of crumbling roads and bridges, unsafe water, racial inequality, and climate change."
The bill passed in a 221-201 vote, with just two Republicans joining Democrats in voting yes. The GOP's near unanimous rejection came "even though it included earmarks proposed by Republican members that would explicitly help their districts," CBS News noted.
The vote came as progressive Democrats continue to demand that the bipartisan infrastructure bill be tied to a broader reconciliation package that includes spending on safety-net programs and investments in green energy.
As CNNreported:
House Democrats say the bill--known as the INVEST in America Act--will deliver on key priorities in President Joe Biden's American Jobs Plan, and they hope the legislative text can be used to negotiate with the Senate and the White House to determine what specific policy proposals can be included as part of the recently announced bipartisan infrastructure framework.
Democratic Rep. Peter DeFazio of Oregon, the lead sponsor of the INVEST Act and chair of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, said at a news conference on Wednesday, "I'm suggesting that substantial amounts of the policy in our bill should be negotiated by the White House, and the Senate and the House to be part of that bipartisan proposal."
DeFazio introduced the bill last month, saying at the time that it would put "a core piece of President Biden's American Jobs Plan into legislative text--seizing this once-in-a-generation opportunity to move our transportation planning out of the 1950s and toward our clean energy future."
According to a fact sheet, the bill puts $343 billion towards roads, bridges, and safety, including $8.3 billion "for activities targeted to reduce carbon pollution and... $6.2 billion for mitigation and resiliency improvements"; $109 billion in transit with "record investments" to increase routes and service; $95 billion for passenger and freight rail, including a tripling of Amtrak funding; $117 billion in drinking water infrastructure and assistance. Water improvements also include "fully" replacing the nation's lead service lines and directing the Environmental Protection Agency to set national standards for PFAS and other toxins, as well as investing $51.25 million in wastewater infrastructure.
Environment America president Wendy Wendlandt called the INVEST in America Act "the approach we need to tackle today's problems, including the greatest challenge of our time: climate change."
She further welcomed the "bill's investments in clean, electric, and zero-carbon transportation options such as walking and biking" as "good news for people and the planet."
While welcoming parts of the bill, Mary Grant, the Public Water for All Campaign Director at Food & Water Watch, expressed concern that the INVEST Act's water infrastructure funding was insufficient and that the bipartisan infrastructure deal could facilitate privatization of public services including water.
"We applaud the House for its commitment to eliminate lead service lines and provide significant household water debt relief with a five-year shutoff moratorium," Grant said, referring to provision of the INVEST Act.
"This legislation offers a bolder response than the Senate's water bill," yet, she said, "the funding levels for water improvements are still not enough." Grant said it was crucial to "seize the opportunity provided by ongoing infrastructure negotiations and ensure the critical, transformative water funding the country really needs."
She suggested the Water Affordability, Transparency, Equity, and Reliability (WATER) Act be included in any infrastructure package as a way to help "provide a permanent water solution and ensure stronger, more resilient and more accessible water systems."
"Congress must reject the White House's ill-conceived bipartisan framework that would privatize water systems through public-private partnerships and asset recycling," she continued. "Our communities cannot afford that compromise on water."
For now, the manner the INVEST Act advances is unclear, Politico reported following the House vote.
"A surface transportation bill, considered must-pass legislation, will eventually be enacted in some way," the outlet noted. "But it's looking increasingly likely to be linked to broader efforts on infrastructure, which would mean an uncharted path ahead for the legislation, which has a deadline of the end of September."
A number of progressive advocacy groups welcomed as a critical step forward the U.S. House's Thursday approval of a water and transportation infrastructure bill, the INVEST in America Act.
"This act is the real clean transportation and water plan people in our country deserve," said Deron Lovaas, a senior policy advocate in NRDC's Healthy People & Thriving Communities program, calling the bill "what we need to tackle the crises of crumbling roads and bridges, unsafe water, racial inequality, and climate change."
The bill passed in a 221-201 vote, with just two Republicans joining Democrats in voting yes. The GOP's near unanimous rejection came "even though it included earmarks proposed by Republican members that would explicitly help their districts," CBS News noted.
The vote came as progressive Democrats continue to demand that the bipartisan infrastructure bill be tied to a broader reconciliation package that includes spending on safety-net programs and investments in green energy.
As CNNreported:
House Democrats say the bill--known as the INVEST in America Act--will deliver on key priorities in President Joe Biden's American Jobs Plan, and they hope the legislative text can be used to negotiate with the Senate and the White House to determine what specific policy proposals can be included as part of the recently announced bipartisan infrastructure framework.
Democratic Rep. Peter DeFazio of Oregon, the lead sponsor of the INVEST Act and chair of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, said at a news conference on Wednesday, "I'm suggesting that substantial amounts of the policy in our bill should be negotiated by the White House, and the Senate and the House to be part of that bipartisan proposal."
DeFazio introduced the bill last month, saying at the time that it would put "a core piece of President Biden's American Jobs Plan into legislative text--seizing this once-in-a-generation opportunity to move our transportation planning out of the 1950s and toward our clean energy future."
According to a fact sheet, the bill puts $343 billion towards roads, bridges, and safety, including $8.3 billion "for activities targeted to reduce carbon pollution and... $6.2 billion for mitigation and resiliency improvements"; $109 billion in transit with "record investments" to increase routes and service; $95 billion for passenger and freight rail, including a tripling of Amtrak funding; $117 billion in drinking water infrastructure and assistance. Water improvements also include "fully" replacing the nation's lead service lines and directing the Environmental Protection Agency to set national standards for PFAS and other toxins, as well as investing $51.25 million in wastewater infrastructure.
Environment America president Wendy Wendlandt called the INVEST in America Act "the approach we need to tackle today's problems, including the greatest challenge of our time: climate change."
She further welcomed the "bill's investments in clean, electric, and zero-carbon transportation options such as walking and biking" as "good news for people and the planet."
While welcoming parts of the bill, Mary Grant, the Public Water for All Campaign Director at Food & Water Watch, expressed concern that the INVEST Act's water infrastructure funding was insufficient and that the bipartisan infrastructure deal could facilitate privatization of public services including water.
"We applaud the House for its commitment to eliminate lead service lines and provide significant household water debt relief with a five-year shutoff moratorium," Grant said, referring to provision of the INVEST Act.
"This legislation offers a bolder response than the Senate's water bill," yet, she said, "the funding levels for water improvements are still not enough." Grant said it was crucial to "seize the opportunity provided by ongoing infrastructure negotiations and ensure the critical, transformative water funding the country really needs."
She suggested the Water Affordability, Transparency, Equity, and Reliability (WATER) Act be included in any infrastructure package as a way to help "provide a permanent water solution and ensure stronger, more resilient and more accessible water systems."
"Congress must reject the White House's ill-conceived bipartisan framework that would privatize water systems through public-private partnerships and asset recycling," she continued. "Our communities cannot afford that compromise on water."
For now, the manner the INVEST Act advances is unclear, Politico reported following the House vote.
"A surface transportation bill, considered must-pass legislation, will eventually be enacted in some way," the outlet noted. "But it's looking increasingly likely to be linked to broader efforts on infrastructure, which would mean an uncharted path ahead for the legislation, which has a deadline of the end of September."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.