Demonstrators seen holding placards during the "Stop The Bans Day of Action for Abortion Rights" rally in front of the Supreme Court in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Michael Brochstein/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images)
Jul 12, 2019
The Center for Reproductive Rights on Friday announced its intention to keep fighting after an Oklahoma court upheld a ban on a common abortion procedure.
"We cannot overstate the harm this decision will have on women in Oklahoma," said Julie Rikelman, litigation director at the Center for Reproductive Rights (CRR), in a statement. CRR filed the suit on behalf of Tulsa Women's Clinic to have the law stricken down.
Oklahoma County District Judge Cindy Truong's ruling upholds House Bill 1721, a 2015 law that "targets a procedure known as dilation and evacuation (D and E), which is frequently used during second-trimester abortions," as Rewire's legislative tracker noted.
The American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) has called D and E "evidence-based and medically preferred because it results in the fewest complications for women compared to alternative procedures." Efforts to ban any particular type of procedure, the group said, "represent legislative interference at its worst: doctors will be forced, by ill-advised, unscientifically motivated policy, to provide lesser care to patients. This is unacceptable."
As CRR said in its statement, Truong's ruling bucks a trend: other state courts ruling on similar bans in Alabama, Arkansas, Kansas, Kentucky, and Texas blocked them from taking effect. The U.S. Supreme Court also said last month it would not hear Alabama's appeal to keep its similar law on the books.
\u201cWe are saddened to announce that today the Oklahoma district court became the first court in the country to uphold a ban on the standard method of ending a pregnancy after approximately 14 weeks. #stopthebans https://t.co/Ulw2ZjZFHP\u201d— Oklahoma Call for Reproductive Justice (@Oklahoma Call for Reproductive Justice) 1562951791
"Politicians should never take medical options off the table for pregnant patients," said Rikelman. The Oklahoma law, she said, "bans care that women need and doctors recommend, and is part of a national strategy by anti-abortion politicians to push abortion care out of reach by passing hundreds of laws that limit access. We will keep fighting this unconstitutional ban to make sure Oklahomans have access to the best medical treatment."
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today! |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
The Center for Reproductive Rights on Friday announced its intention to keep fighting after an Oklahoma court upheld a ban on a common abortion procedure.
"We cannot overstate the harm this decision will have on women in Oklahoma," said Julie Rikelman, litigation director at the Center for Reproductive Rights (CRR), in a statement. CRR filed the suit on behalf of Tulsa Women's Clinic to have the law stricken down.
Oklahoma County District Judge Cindy Truong's ruling upholds House Bill 1721, a 2015 law that "targets a procedure known as dilation and evacuation (D and E), which is frequently used during second-trimester abortions," as Rewire's legislative tracker noted.
The American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) has called D and E "evidence-based and medically preferred because it results in the fewest complications for women compared to alternative procedures." Efforts to ban any particular type of procedure, the group said, "represent legislative interference at its worst: doctors will be forced, by ill-advised, unscientifically motivated policy, to provide lesser care to patients. This is unacceptable."
As CRR said in its statement, Truong's ruling bucks a trend: other state courts ruling on similar bans in Alabama, Arkansas, Kansas, Kentucky, and Texas blocked them from taking effect. The U.S. Supreme Court also said last month it would not hear Alabama's appeal to keep its similar law on the books.
\u201cWe are saddened to announce that today the Oklahoma district court became the first court in the country to uphold a ban on the standard method of ending a pregnancy after approximately 14 weeks. #stopthebans https://t.co/Ulw2ZjZFHP\u201d— Oklahoma Call for Reproductive Justice (@Oklahoma Call for Reproductive Justice) 1562951791
"Politicians should never take medical options off the table for pregnant patients," said Rikelman. The Oklahoma law, she said, "bans care that women need and doctors recommend, and is part of a national strategy by anti-abortion politicians to push abortion care out of reach by passing hundreds of laws that limit access. We will keep fighting this unconstitutional ban to make sure Oklahomans have access to the best medical treatment."
The Center for Reproductive Rights on Friday announced its intention to keep fighting after an Oklahoma court upheld a ban on a common abortion procedure.
"We cannot overstate the harm this decision will have on women in Oklahoma," said Julie Rikelman, litigation director at the Center for Reproductive Rights (CRR), in a statement. CRR filed the suit on behalf of Tulsa Women's Clinic to have the law stricken down.
Oklahoma County District Judge Cindy Truong's ruling upholds House Bill 1721, a 2015 law that "targets a procedure known as dilation and evacuation (D and E), which is frequently used during second-trimester abortions," as Rewire's legislative tracker noted.
The American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) has called D and E "evidence-based and medically preferred because it results in the fewest complications for women compared to alternative procedures." Efforts to ban any particular type of procedure, the group said, "represent legislative interference at its worst: doctors will be forced, by ill-advised, unscientifically motivated policy, to provide lesser care to patients. This is unacceptable."
As CRR said in its statement, Truong's ruling bucks a trend: other state courts ruling on similar bans in Alabama, Arkansas, Kansas, Kentucky, and Texas blocked them from taking effect. The U.S. Supreme Court also said last month it would not hear Alabama's appeal to keep its similar law on the books.
\u201cWe are saddened to announce that today the Oklahoma district court became the first court in the country to uphold a ban on the standard method of ending a pregnancy after approximately 14 weeks. #stopthebans https://t.co/Ulw2ZjZFHP\u201d— Oklahoma Call for Reproductive Justice (@Oklahoma Call for Reproductive Justice) 1562951791
"Politicians should never take medical options off the table for pregnant patients," said Rikelman. The Oklahoma law, she said, "bans care that women need and doctors recommend, and is part of a national strategy by anti-abortion politicians to push abortion care out of reach by passing hundreds of laws that limit access. We will keep fighting this unconstitutional ban to make sure Oklahomans have access to the best medical treatment."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.