"This is a dangerous disregard for the rule of law by Pennsylvania Republicans," voting rights expert Stephen Wolf argued on Twitter Monday. (Photo: Janai Nelson/Twitter)
Feb 05, 2018
After the U.S. Supreme Court rejected an attempt by the Pennsylvania GOP to restore the state's "insanely gerrymandered" congressional map on Monday, one Republican decided that the next rational course of action would be to launch an impeachment campaign against the five state justices who deemed the map unconstitutional--a move critics denounced as a "remarkable" attempt to subvert democracy.
"Impeaching judges because one disagrees with a court decision that strengthened democracy is a classic move of authoritarian regimes."
--Stephen Wolf
The effort was spearheaded by Republican Pennsylvania state Rep. Cris Dush, who sent a memo attacking the state Supreme Court's 5-2 ruling last month that said the GOP-drawn districts "clearly, plainly, and palpably" violate the state constitution. Many analysts agreed with this interpretation, calling the map one of the most extreme partisan gerrymanders in the nation.
Instead of obeying the court's order to redraw the map ahead of the 2018 midterms, Dush on Monday urged his colleagues to co-sponsor legislation to remove the five Pennsylvania Supreme Court justices who struck down the map.
"The five justices who signed this order that blatantly and clearly contradicts the plain language of the Pennsylvania constitution, engaged in misbehavior in office. Wherefore, each is guilty of an impeachable offense warranting removal from office and disqualification to hold any office or trust or profit under this Commonwealth."
\u201cA remarkable subversion of our democracy continues in Pennsylvania. After losing their fight at the Supreme Court, Republicans are now threatening to impeach members of the state Supreme Court who found the congressional map to be an unconstitutional gerrymander.\u201d— Matt McDermott (@Matt McDermott) 1517431288
While experts characterized the Pennsylvania GOP's legal arguments for restoring the gerrymandered map as "frivolous," many reacted with alarm to Dush's memo, calling it a "serious threat" because Republicans--thanks to aggressive gerrymandering--hold a strong majority in the state legislature.
"This is a dangerous disregard for the rule of law by Pennsylvania Republicans," voting rights expert Stephen Wolf argued on Twitter Monday. "Impeaching judges because one disagrees with a court decision that strengthened democracy is a classic move of authoritarian regimes."
Other commentators expressed their agreement with Wolf, calling the impeachment push further evidence that "the Republican Party does not believe in democracy."
\u201cWoah. This is INSANE. The PA Supreme Court ruled that gerrymandered districts violated the state constitution. So now legislators are proposing to impeach the majority of the justices who ruled against them. https://t.co/NV5HBvJOFc\u201d— Julian Sanchez (@Julian Sanchez) 1517879771
\u201crat bastard cheating, it's the Republican way https://t.co/OFy7e1Y5kG\u201d— ryan cooper (@ryan cooper) 1517884926
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today! |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
After the U.S. Supreme Court rejected an attempt by the Pennsylvania GOP to restore the state's "insanely gerrymandered" congressional map on Monday, one Republican decided that the next rational course of action would be to launch an impeachment campaign against the five state justices who deemed the map unconstitutional--a move critics denounced as a "remarkable" attempt to subvert democracy.
"Impeaching judges because one disagrees with a court decision that strengthened democracy is a classic move of authoritarian regimes."
--Stephen Wolf
The effort was spearheaded by Republican Pennsylvania state Rep. Cris Dush, who sent a memo attacking the state Supreme Court's 5-2 ruling last month that said the GOP-drawn districts "clearly, plainly, and palpably" violate the state constitution. Many analysts agreed with this interpretation, calling the map one of the most extreme partisan gerrymanders in the nation.
Instead of obeying the court's order to redraw the map ahead of the 2018 midterms, Dush on Monday urged his colleagues to co-sponsor legislation to remove the five Pennsylvania Supreme Court justices who struck down the map.
"The five justices who signed this order that blatantly and clearly contradicts the plain language of the Pennsylvania constitution, engaged in misbehavior in office. Wherefore, each is guilty of an impeachable offense warranting removal from office and disqualification to hold any office or trust or profit under this Commonwealth."
\u201cA remarkable subversion of our democracy continues in Pennsylvania. After losing their fight at the Supreme Court, Republicans are now threatening to impeach members of the state Supreme Court who found the congressional map to be an unconstitutional gerrymander.\u201d— Matt McDermott (@Matt McDermott) 1517431288
While experts characterized the Pennsylvania GOP's legal arguments for restoring the gerrymandered map as "frivolous," many reacted with alarm to Dush's memo, calling it a "serious threat" because Republicans--thanks to aggressive gerrymandering--hold a strong majority in the state legislature.
"This is a dangerous disregard for the rule of law by Pennsylvania Republicans," voting rights expert Stephen Wolf argued on Twitter Monday. "Impeaching judges because one disagrees with a court decision that strengthened democracy is a classic move of authoritarian regimes."
Other commentators expressed their agreement with Wolf, calling the impeachment push further evidence that "the Republican Party does not believe in democracy."
\u201cWoah. This is INSANE. The PA Supreme Court ruled that gerrymandered districts violated the state constitution. So now legislators are proposing to impeach the majority of the justices who ruled against them. https://t.co/NV5HBvJOFc\u201d— Julian Sanchez (@Julian Sanchez) 1517879771
\u201crat bastard cheating, it's the Republican way https://t.co/OFy7e1Y5kG\u201d— ryan cooper (@ryan cooper) 1517884926
After the U.S. Supreme Court rejected an attempt by the Pennsylvania GOP to restore the state's "insanely gerrymandered" congressional map on Monday, one Republican decided that the next rational course of action would be to launch an impeachment campaign against the five state justices who deemed the map unconstitutional--a move critics denounced as a "remarkable" attempt to subvert democracy.
"Impeaching judges because one disagrees with a court decision that strengthened democracy is a classic move of authoritarian regimes."
--Stephen Wolf
The effort was spearheaded by Republican Pennsylvania state Rep. Cris Dush, who sent a memo attacking the state Supreme Court's 5-2 ruling last month that said the GOP-drawn districts "clearly, plainly, and palpably" violate the state constitution. Many analysts agreed with this interpretation, calling the map one of the most extreme partisan gerrymanders in the nation.
Instead of obeying the court's order to redraw the map ahead of the 2018 midterms, Dush on Monday urged his colleagues to co-sponsor legislation to remove the five Pennsylvania Supreme Court justices who struck down the map.
"The five justices who signed this order that blatantly and clearly contradicts the plain language of the Pennsylvania constitution, engaged in misbehavior in office. Wherefore, each is guilty of an impeachable offense warranting removal from office and disqualification to hold any office or trust or profit under this Commonwealth."
\u201cA remarkable subversion of our democracy continues in Pennsylvania. After losing their fight at the Supreme Court, Republicans are now threatening to impeach members of the state Supreme Court who found the congressional map to be an unconstitutional gerrymander.\u201d— Matt McDermott (@Matt McDermott) 1517431288
While experts characterized the Pennsylvania GOP's legal arguments for restoring the gerrymandered map as "frivolous," many reacted with alarm to Dush's memo, calling it a "serious threat" because Republicans--thanks to aggressive gerrymandering--hold a strong majority in the state legislature.
"This is a dangerous disregard for the rule of law by Pennsylvania Republicans," voting rights expert Stephen Wolf argued on Twitter Monday. "Impeaching judges because one disagrees with a court decision that strengthened democracy is a classic move of authoritarian regimes."
Other commentators expressed their agreement with Wolf, calling the impeachment push further evidence that "the Republican Party does not believe in democracy."
\u201cWoah. This is INSANE. The PA Supreme Court ruled that gerrymandered districts violated the state constitution. So now legislators are proposing to impeach the majority of the justices who ruled against them. https://t.co/NV5HBvJOFc\u201d— Julian Sanchez (@Julian Sanchez) 1517879771
\u201crat bastard cheating, it's the Republican way https://t.co/OFy7e1Y5kG\u201d— ryan cooper (@ryan cooper) 1517884926
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.