An anti-war protest in 2010. (Photo: Fibonacci Blue/cc/flickr)
Jun 27, 2014
President Obama on Thursday announced he would ask Congress for $58.6 billion in war funding for the 2015 fiscal year.
A White House statement outlining the request for what is formally called the Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO) notes that it is $20.9 billion less than what had been figured in an earlier budget.
The OCO--re-branded from the Global War on Terror--fund is in addition to the nearly $500 billion base FY2015 budget for the Defense Department.
The OCO fund request amount on its own represents 1.55 percent of the the total budget, but is part of the overall military spending that accounts for over 16 percent of the budget.
The OCO budget "isn't subject to caps or cuts or any restrictions at all," as Mattea Kramer of the National Priorities Projected has noted, and, as Defense News reported earlier this month, "The administration has never announced a final year for OCO funding."
"While it is good to see the Overseas Contingency Operations account finally begin to come down, the Pentagon's request continues to use OCO as a massive slush fund to avoid fiscal discipline," Stephen Miles, coalition coordinator for Win Without War, stated to Common Dreams. "At nearly $60 billion, the request is $40 billion over what the Administration itself has pegged as the costs of our mission in Afghanistan," he added.
Included within the nearly $60 billion request is "$500 million for a proposed authority to train and equip vetted elements of the Syrian armed opposition to help defend the Syrian people, stabilize areas under opposition control, facilitate the provision of essential services, counter terrorist threats, and promote conditions for a negotiated settlement."
As Democracy Now!reported Friday, "If approved, it would mark the most direct U.S. military role in the [Syrian] conflict to date, following more covert forms of support for the rebels."
In contrast to calls by war hawks for continued military intervention, Miles added that the American public doesn't want continued war funding.
"Americans want our tax dollars to be coming home with our troops," he stated.
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today! |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
President Obama on Thursday announced he would ask Congress for $58.6 billion in war funding for the 2015 fiscal year.
A White House statement outlining the request for what is formally called the Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO) notes that it is $20.9 billion less than what had been figured in an earlier budget.
The OCO--re-branded from the Global War on Terror--fund is in addition to the nearly $500 billion base FY2015 budget for the Defense Department.
The OCO fund request amount on its own represents 1.55 percent of the the total budget, but is part of the overall military spending that accounts for over 16 percent of the budget.
The OCO budget "isn't subject to caps or cuts or any restrictions at all," as Mattea Kramer of the National Priorities Projected has noted, and, as Defense News reported earlier this month, "The administration has never announced a final year for OCO funding."
"While it is good to see the Overseas Contingency Operations account finally begin to come down, the Pentagon's request continues to use OCO as a massive slush fund to avoid fiscal discipline," Stephen Miles, coalition coordinator for Win Without War, stated to Common Dreams. "At nearly $60 billion, the request is $40 billion over what the Administration itself has pegged as the costs of our mission in Afghanistan," he added.
Included within the nearly $60 billion request is "$500 million for a proposed authority to train and equip vetted elements of the Syrian armed opposition to help defend the Syrian people, stabilize areas under opposition control, facilitate the provision of essential services, counter terrorist threats, and promote conditions for a negotiated settlement."
As Democracy Now!reported Friday, "If approved, it would mark the most direct U.S. military role in the [Syrian] conflict to date, following more covert forms of support for the rebels."
In contrast to calls by war hawks for continued military intervention, Miles added that the American public doesn't want continued war funding.
"Americans want our tax dollars to be coming home with our troops," he stated.
President Obama on Thursday announced he would ask Congress for $58.6 billion in war funding for the 2015 fiscal year.
A White House statement outlining the request for what is formally called the Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO) notes that it is $20.9 billion less than what had been figured in an earlier budget.
The OCO--re-branded from the Global War on Terror--fund is in addition to the nearly $500 billion base FY2015 budget for the Defense Department.
The OCO fund request amount on its own represents 1.55 percent of the the total budget, but is part of the overall military spending that accounts for over 16 percent of the budget.
The OCO budget "isn't subject to caps or cuts or any restrictions at all," as Mattea Kramer of the National Priorities Projected has noted, and, as Defense News reported earlier this month, "The administration has never announced a final year for OCO funding."
"While it is good to see the Overseas Contingency Operations account finally begin to come down, the Pentagon's request continues to use OCO as a massive slush fund to avoid fiscal discipline," Stephen Miles, coalition coordinator for Win Without War, stated to Common Dreams. "At nearly $60 billion, the request is $40 billion over what the Administration itself has pegged as the costs of our mission in Afghanistan," he added.
Included within the nearly $60 billion request is "$500 million for a proposed authority to train and equip vetted elements of the Syrian armed opposition to help defend the Syrian people, stabilize areas under opposition control, facilitate the provision of essential services, counter terrorist threats, and promote conditions for a negotiated settlement."
As Democracy Now!reported Friday, "If approved, it would mark the most direct U.S. military role in the [Syrian] conflict to date, following more covert forms of support for the rebels."
In contrast to calls by war hawks for continued military intervention, Miles added that the American public doesn't want continued war funding.
"Americans want our tax dollars to be coming home with our troops," he stated.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.