Published on
The Tyee (Canada)

Oil Sands to Boom: Internal Federal Report

Expect a rise in greenhouse-gas emitting heavy crude oil production in North America, says federal government report.

Stanley Tromp

Prepare for a Canadian and U.S. shift toward heavier
forms of crude oil as global production of lighter crude oil sources
decline, says a federal government report. As well, "Generally, heavier
forms of crude oil, such as that contained in the oil sands, require
more energy and resources to produce and refine, compared to lighter
crude oil, resulting in higher air pollutant and GHG [greenhouse gas]

Those were amongst the conclusions of "A
discussion paper on the Oil Sands: Challenges and Opportunities" by
economist Kevin Birn and policy advisor Paul Khanna. Both work for the
federal department of natural resources, but state they were only
expressing their own views. The 25-page internal report of July 2010
(which provides a good introduction to the subject for the general
reader) was obtained via the Access to Information Act.

Oil sands GHGs 'will likely rise'

Beneath about 142,000 square kilometres of
boreal forests, prairies and wetlands in Alberta lies the second-largest
known deposit of crude oil in the world, that is an estimated 1.8
trillion barrels, the report begins.

Alberta is now producing 1.5 million
barrels of oil sands production each day, which is forecast to rise to
3.8 million barrels a day by 2020. The oil sands is "the only one in
North America, currently capable of making large scale contributions to
our energy security," said the authors.

The industrial challenge is to separate the
valuable bitumen crude oil from the sands and clay. For oil sands that
are too deep for surface mining operations, some form of "in-situ" is
needed to extract the oil. Most in-situ operations involve the
injection of steam into the oil sands deep underground.

The steam warms the bitumen, making it more mobile, so that it can then be extracted through drilling.

Some sources say 20 per cent of this area
will be mined versus 80 per cent being developed in situ. (The Alberta
government disagrees, telling The Tyee the number is more like 2.5 per
cent mining and 97.5 per cent in situ.) Regarding greenhouse gas
emissions, "In the oil sands, in-situ operations are generally more GHG
intensive [than mining... Upgraders also contribute to GHG emissions
through the hydrogen production process."

"While the industry has historically made
significant reductions in GHG emissions intensity of crude oil
production, falling 39 per cent from 1990 to 2008, absolute GHG
emissions from the oil sands industry will likely continue to rise --
due to anticipated production increases."

Greener process unproven

Experimental extraction technologies could
dramatically lower GHG emissions, "but these are yet to be proven on a
large scale." Several projects on heavy oil upgraders show promise, "but
large scale applications in oil sands operations still face a number of

And yet, overall, Alberta's oil sands
production accounted for only five per cent of Canada's total GHG
emissions in 2008, the study said.

The report has some positive news: "Today,
government investment has shifted from improving the economics of oil
sands production towards researching ways to reduce the environmental
impact performance of the sector." Yet many such experiments are
inconclusive as yet.

For example, in-situ operations are moving
to the use of saline/brackish groundwater sources to reduce impacts on
surface water. "However, the impacts of groundwater withdrawals and
re-injection of process water from in-situ operations back into the
ground is still being studied."

Land use impacts differ between mining and
in-situ operations. Mining operations need the removal of all top soil
to access the oil sands. These soils are stored for later use in
reclamation projects. "This results in a large scale temporary removal
of wildlife and wildlife habitat." To date, about 600 square kilometres
of land has been affected by mining activity. In-situ has a milder land
use impact than surface mining.

"Due to the long time frames (e.g. 40-60
plus years) and massive scale of oil sands mining projects, reclamation
of disturbed land does not happen quickly." The province of Alberta
demands that companies remediate and reclaim land after the oil sands
have been extracted. To date, 67 square kilometres is under active
reclamation and one square kilometre has been certified as reclaimed.
Although this number seems small, the report says, it was still a useful
learning experience.

Aboriginals split on oil sands

Tailing ponds are created at oil sands
mining operations from the leftover water, clay and sand of the bitumen
separation process, and cover about 170 square kilometres. Some worry
about the potential seepage from the tailings ponds into the local
ecosystem, yet all tailing ponds are built with groundwater monitoring
and seepage capture systems, and in 2008 Environment Canada found no
evidence of tailing ponds contaminants leaching into the river, said the

However, the report said, "It should be
noted that the presence of naturally eroding surface bitumen deposits in
the area complicates the tracing of tailing pond residues in the river
in a definitive manner."

The authors also note a deep split amongst
Alberta's 6,000 aboriginal people living within the oil sands' area.
Some complain of health problems and harms to fisheries and wildlife,
but others prosper economically. The Alberta government says that in
2008 there were over 1,500 aboriginals employed in the oil sands, with a
$575 million boon to aboriginal businesses.

This is the world we live in. This is the world we cover.

Because of people like you, another world is possible. There are many battles to be won, but we will battle them together—all of us. Common Dreams is not your normal news site. We don't survive on clicks. We don't want advertising dollars. We want the world to be a better place. But we can't do it alone. It doesn't work that way. We need you. If you can help today—because every gift of every size matters—please do.

Share This Article

More in: