Published on

Stiglitz: More Stimulus Now or Economic Pain Will Endure

Nobel Prize-Winning Economist Joseph Stiglitz Calls for Second Federal Stimulus

Linda Austin

Nobel Prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz called for a second round of federal stimulus spending in a New York speech to the Society of American Business Editors and Writers. (

NEW YORK — Nobel Prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz called for
another round of federal stimulus dollars to spur the economy. He spoke
Sept. 30 to the Society of American Business Editors and Writers (SABEW)
at its Fall Workshop.

“We will see in the next two years the real cost of there not being a
second round of stimulus,” he said. “We will see the economy slow down
at a very high economic cost.”

The Columbia University professor also said that the “new normal” as
far as the unemployment rate is concerned may not be the 4 to 5 percent
that existed before the financial crisis in 2008, but more like 7 to 8

Unemployment is about 9.5 to 9.6 percent officially, he said, but
many people who are working part-time involuntarily or who have stopped
looking but want work are not counted in the official rate.

Congress passed the first stimulus on Feb. 11, 2009, approving a $787 billion bill, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act.


Never Miss a Beat.

Get our best delivered to your inbox.

He said one reason that stimulus has not had more effect is that
state and local governments have cut spending, undoing about one-half of
the impact of the money that the feds have injected.

He said the stimulus also could have had more effect if more money
had been put into making up for the shortfalls of state budgets,
stopping layoffs; if less had been put into tax cuts that wary consumers
just ended up saving; and if safeguards to prevent waste had not slowed
the money from being spent.

Still, he said, “The stimulus absolutely worked.” Without it, unemployment could have peaked at more than 12 percent.

He said that one-fourth of Americans have negative equity in their
homes, meaning that they can’t draw on their homes as a piggybank to
borrow and live beyond their means. In fact, they are going to have to
live below their means to pay off debt accumulated during better times.

“We likely face a marked reduction in standard of living,” he said.

This is the world we live in. This is the world we cover.

Because of people like you, another world is possible. There are many battles to be won, but we will battle them together—all of us. Common Dreams is not your normal news site. We don't survive on clicks. We don't want advertising dollars. We want the world to be a better place. But we can't do it alone. It doesn't work that way. We need you. If you can help today—because every gift of every size matters—please do. Without Your Support We Simply Don't Exist.

Please select a donation method:

Share This Article