Published on
the McClatchy Newspapers

Lobbyists Push Use of Deadly Asbestos in Developing Nations

Jim Morris, International Consortium of Investigative Journalists

White asbestos is flaky and fibrous (BBC)

WASHINGTON - A global network of lobby groups has
spent nearly $100 million since the mid-1980s to preserve the
international market for asbestos, a known carcinogen that's taken
millions of lives and is banned or restricted in 52 countries, the
International Consortium of Investigative Journalists has found in a
nine-month investigation.

Backed by public and private money and aided by
scientists and friendly governments, the groups helped facilitate the
sale of 2.2 million tons of asbestos last year, mostly in developing
nations. Anchored by the Montreal-based Chrysotile Institute, the
network stretches from New Delhi to Mexico City to the city of Asbest in
Russia's Ural Mountains. Its message is that asbestos can be used
safely under "controlled" conditions.

As a result, asbestos use is
growing rapidly in countries such as China and India, prompting health
experts to warn of future epidemics of lung cancer, asbestosis and
mesothelioma, an aggressive malignancy that usually attacks the lining
of the lungs.

The World Health Organization says that 125 million people still
encounter asbestos in the workplace, and the United Nations'
International Labor Organization estimates that 100,000 workers die each
year from asbestos-related diseases. Thousands more perish from
exposures outside the workplace.

Dr. James Leigh, the retired
director of the Centre for Occupational and Environmental Health at the
Sydney School of Public Health in Australia, has forecast a total of 5
million to 10 million deaths from asbestos-related cancers by 2030, an
estimate he considers conservative.

"It's totally unethical,"
Jukka Takala, the director of the European Agency for Safety and Health
at Work and a former International Labor Organization official, said of
the pro-asbestos campaign. "It's almost criminal. Asbestos cannot be
used safely. It is clearly a carcinogen. It kills people."

a panel of 27 experts convened by the WHO's International Agency for
Research on Cancer reported last year, "Epidemiological evidence has
increasingly shown an association of all forms of asbestos ... with an
increased risk of lung cancer and mesothelioma."

The asbestos
industry, however, has signaled that it will fight to protect sales of
raw fiber and finished products such as asbestos cement roofing and
water pipes. Among its allies are industry-funded researchers who have
contributed hundreds of articles to the scientific literature claiming
that chrysotile - white asbestos, the only kind sold today - is orders
of magnitude less hazardous than brown or blue asbestos. Russia is the
world's biggest chrysotile producer, China the biggest consumer.

an extremely valuable material," argued Dr. J. Corbett McDonald, an
emeritus professor of epidemiology at McGill University in Montreal who
began studying chrysotile-exposed workers in the mid-1960s with the
support of the Quebec Asbestos Mining Association. "It's very cheap. If
they try to rebuild Haiti and use no asbestos it will cost them much
more. Any health effects (from chrysotile) will be trivial, if any."

sanguine view of chrysotile assumes that employers provide proper dust
controls, ventilation and protective equipment for workers, but public
health experts say that such measures are uncommon in the developing

"Anybody who talks about controlled asbestos use is either a
liar or a fool," said Barry Castleman, an environmental consultant
based near Washington who advises the WHO on asbestos matters.

and heat-resistant, strong and inexpensive, asbestos - a naturally
occurring fibrous mineral - once was seen as a construction material
with near-magical properties. For decades, industrialized countries from
the United States to Australia relied on it for countless products,
including pipe and ceiling insulation, shipbuilding materials, brake
shoes and pads, bricks, roofing and flooring.

In the early 20th
century, reports of the mineral's lung-ravaging properties began to
surface. By the century's end, millions of people were sick or had died
from asbestos exposure, and billions of dollars in compensation had been
paid to claimants.

Ninety-five percent of all the asbestos ever used has been chrysotile.

sordid history, however, hasn't deterred the asbestos lobby, whose
longtime leader is Canada. The federal government and the government of
Quebec, where chrysotile has been mined for decades, collectively have
given 35 million Canadian dollars to the Chrysotile Institute, formerly
known as the Asbestos Institute.

Canada uses little asbestos
domestically but it sent 168,000 tons abroad last year; more than half
of that went to India. Canada has fought to keep chrysotile from being
listed under Annex III of the Rotterdam Convention, a treaty that
requires exporters of hazardous substances to use clear labeling and
warn importers of any restrictions or bans.

Despite mounting
pressure from public health officials to stop asbestos exports, Canadian
officials continue to defend the industry.

"Since 1979, the
government of Canada has promoted the safe and controlled use of
chrysotile and our position remains the same," Christian Paradis, the
natural resources minister in Canada's conservative government and a
former president of the Asbestos Chamber of Commerce and Industry, told
the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists in a written

Amir Attaran, an associate professor of law and
medicine at the University of Ottawa, calls the government's position
unconscionable. "It's absolutely clear that (Prime Minister) Stephen
Harper and his government have accepted the reality that the present
course of action kills people, and they find that tolerable," Attaran

The Chrysotile Institute's president, Clement Godbout, said his organization's message had been misinterpreted.

never said that chrysotile was not dangerous," he said. "We said that
chrysotile is a product with potential risk and it has to be controlled.
It's not something that you put in your coffee every morning."

The institute is a purveyor of information, Godbout emphasized, not an international police agency.

"We don't have the power to interfere in any countries that have their own powers, their own sovereignty," he said.

said he was convinced that large asbestos cement factories in Indian
cities had good dust controls and medical surveillance, though he
acknowledged there might be smaller operations "where the rules are not
really followed. But it's not an accurate picture of the industry. If
you have someone on a highway in the U.S. driving at 200 miles per hour,
it doesn't mean everybody's doing it."

The Chrysotile Institute
offers what it describes as "technical and financial aid" to a dozen
sister organizations around the world. These organizations, in turn,
seek to influence science and policy in their own countries and regions.

the situation in Mexico, which imports most of its asbestos from
Canada. Promoting chrysotile use is Luis Cejudo Alva, who's overseen the
Instituto Mexicano de Fibro Industrias for 40 years. Cejudo said he was
in regular contact with the Chrysotile Institute and related groups in
Russia and Brazil, and that he gave presentations in Mexico and abroad
on the prudent use of chrysotile.

Dr. Guadalupe Aguilar Madrid, a
physician and researcher at Mexico's federal Social Security Institute,
said the Instituto Mexicano de Fibro Industrias had had a major
influence on Mexico's workplace and environmental rules, which remain
weak. The nation is on the cusp of an epidemic of mesothelioma and other
asbestos-related diseases that could take 5,000 lives per year, the
doctor said.

In Brazil, a state prosecutor is seeking dissolution
of the Brazilian Chrysotile Institute, a self-described public interest
group with tax-exempt status. The prosecutor charges in a court pleading
that the institute is a poorly disguised shill for the Brazilian
asbestos industry. The institute denies the allegation, saying it
"ensures the health and security of workers and users."

In India,
where the asbestos market is growing at the rate of 25 percent per year,
the powerful Asbestos Cement Products Manufacturers Association, a
trade group, has a close relationship with politicians and has received
$50 million from the industry since 1985, according to government

One of the group's specialties is "advertorials," faux
news articles that extol the safety and value of asbestos products. An
ad placed in The Times of India last December is typical. It said, among
other things, that the cancer scourge in the West had come during a
"period of ignorance," when careless handling of asbestos insulation
resulted in excessive exposure. Such exposures are long gone, the ad
said. It neglects to note, however, that asbestos either has vanished
from products or has been banned in industrialized nations.

The asbestos lobby's argument hinges to a great extent on scientists who minimize the health risks of white asbestos.

science on chrysotile began in earnest in the mid-1960s, when damning
studies on asbestos cast unwanted scrutiny on Quebec's then-thriving
mines. Minutes of the Quebec Asbestos Mining Association's November 1965
meeting suggest that the group saw the tobacco industry as a paradigm:
It "was recalled that the tobacco industry launched its own (research)
program and it now knows where it stands. Industry is always well
advised to look after its own problems."

The studies have proved
helpful to an industry that's under growing pressure to disband. They're
disputed by other scientists, who argue that chrysotile is clearly
capable of causing mesothelioma and lung cancer.

"Is there a
legitimate scientific question as to whether white asbestos is less
dangerous (than blue or brown)? Yes," said Dr. Arthur Frank, a physician
and professor at the Drexel University School of Public Health in
Philadelphia. "But is it safe? No."

(This story is part of
"Dangers in the Dust," a joint investigation by the BBC's International
News Services and the International Consortium of Investigative
Journalists. The consortium is a collaboration of some of the world's
top investigative reporters. Launched in 1997 as a project of The Center
for Public Integrity, the consortium globally extends the center's
style of watchdog journalism, working with 100 journalists in 50
countries to produce long-term, transnational investigations.)

Read more on the investigation at and the BBC.

This is the world we live in. This is the world we cover.

Because of people like you, another world is possible. There are many battles to be won, but we will battle them together—all of us. Common Dreams is not your normal news site. We don't survive on clicks. We don't want advertising dollars. We want the world to be a better place. But we can't do it alone. It doesn't work that way. We need you. If you can help today—because every gift of every size matters—please do. Without Your Support We Simply Don't Exist.

Please select a donation method:

Share This Article