Published on
Environmental News Service

Conservationists Hit BP With $19 Billion Clean Water Act Lawsuit


At the direction of the Unified Command, BP contractors burn off surface oil from the spill to keep it from reaching shore, sending clouds of pollution into the atmosphere. June 13, 2010. (Photo courtesy U.S. Coast Guard)

NEW ORLEANS, Louisiana - In the largest
citizen enforcement action ever taken under the Clean Water Act, the
Center for Biological Diversity is suing BP and Transocean Ltd., for
illegally spilling more than 100 million gallons of oil and other
pollutants into the Gulf of Mexico. The suit was filed Friday in U.S.
District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana.

The Center is seeking the maximum possible penalty against BP for the
spill that began April 20 when the oil rig Deepwater Horizon, owned by
Transocean and leased by BP, exploded and caught fire off the coast of
Louisiana about 50 miles southeast of the Mississippi Delta, killing 11

The rig burned for 36 hours before it sank, leaving the damaged wellhead
spilling oil and gas into the water at the latest flow rate estimate of
35,000 to 60,000 barrels per day, released last week by the National
Incident Command's Flow Rate Task Force.

While, BP is now containing approximately 28,000 barrels of oil per day,
the remainder continues to gush into the gulf.

"It is undisputed that responsibility for the oil spill rests primarily
on BP and that efforts to stop the leak have failed. The oil and toxic
pollutants flowing into the Gulf of Mexico are a plain violation of the
Clean Water Act," the Center claims in its complaint, which states that
BP does not have a permit to discharge the oil.

Investigations to determine the causes of the incident are ongoing in
Congress and at several federal agencies. In addition, President Barack
Obama has established a Presidential Commission to get to the bottom of
the situation.

If BP's violations are found to have been the result of gross negligence
or willful misconduct, the maximum fine is $4,300 per barrel spilled.
At this rate, the company is already liable for approximately $11
billion in Clean Water Act penalties.

If the spill continues through August 1, 2010, BP's liability will be
approximately $19 billion. The penalties will be paid to the U.S.
Treasury and will be available for Gulf coast restoration efforts.

Under an agreement between BP officials and President Obama reached last
week, the company has set aside $20 billion in an independently
administered escrow fund to cover spill-related claims.

Accompanied by Mississippi Governor Haley Barbour, fund administrator,
attorney Kenneth Feinberg told a news conference in Jackson on Friday,
"The goal is to help the people of Mississippi and the Gulf and I intend
to do that and to be prompt."

"I would hope we will pay claims within 30 to 60 days," Feinberg said.

The Center's lawsuit seeks a full accounting from BP of how much oil is
gushing into the Gulf of Mexico each day and what pollutants are mixed
in with the oil.

"The government has yet to take any criminal or civil actions against
BP," said Kieran Suckling, executive director of the Center for
Biological Diversity.


The media landscape is changing fast

Our news team is changing too as we work hard to bring you the news that matters most.

Change is coming. And we've got it covered.

Please donate to our 2019 Mid-Year Campaign today.

"We filed this suit to ensure BP is held accountable for every drop of
oil and pollution it has released into the Gulf of Mexico," he said. "We
can't bring back dead sea turtles, dolphins and whales, but we can
ensure BP is penalized to the full extent of the law for causing the
worst environmental disaster in American history."

In addition to the oil," alleged Sucking, "the spill is also leaking
hazardous chemicals including benzene, arsenic and naphthalene."

"Gulf residents, cleanup crews, wildlife officials and the American
public have a right to know to the magnitude and danger of this spill,"
said Suckling. "The company hasn't been forthright even in the face of
public outrage. A judge's order will change all that. Until then, we're
flying blind when it comes to protecting human health and the

The Center has taken other legal actions in connection with the BP oil

On May 27, the Center filed a lawsuit against Interior Secretary Ken
Salazar and the Minerals Management Service to strike down the agency's
exemption of 49 Gulf of Mexico drilling projects from all environmental
review. That suit was filed in the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in New

On June 3, the Center filed an official notice of its intent to sue the
Environmental Protection Agency for authorizing the use of toxic
dispersants without ensuring that these chemicals would not harm
endangered species and their habitats. The letter of notice requests
that the agency, along with the U.S. Coast Guard, immediately study the
effects of dispersants on species such as sea turtles, sperm whales,
piping plovers, and corals and incorporate this knowledge into oil-spill
response efforts.

A federal judge has ruled that there is no reason to delay an oil spill
lawsuit against BP Plc while the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict
Litigation decides whether or not to consolidate the more than 130
lawsuits arising from the Deepwater Horizon rig explosion.

On May 27 Chief Judge William Steele of the U.S. District Court for the
Southern District of Alabama denied BP's motion to stay the litigation
Tuesday, ruling that preliminary motions might proceed.

BP says it has now spent roughly $2 billion since April 20 trying to
stop the oil spill and to pay initial claims for damages.

The spill has now fouled shores in four states - Louisiana, Alabama,
Mississippi and Florida.

Today, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, NOAA,
expanded the closed fishing area in the Gulf of Mexico to include areas
where the oil slick is moving beyond the current boundaries off of the
Florida panhandle and due south of Mississippi.

The closed area now covers 86,985 square miles, which is about 36
percent of Gulf of Mexico federal waters. This federal closure does not
apply to any state waters.

Closing fishing in the designated areas is a precautionary measure to
ensure that seafood from the Gulf will remain safe for consumers.

We want a more open and sharing world.

That's why our content is free. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported.

All of our original content is published under Creative Commons—allowing (and encouraging) our articles to be republished freely anywhere. In addition to the traffic and reach our content generates on our site, the multiplying impact of our work is huge and growing as our articles flourish across the Internet and are republished by other large and small online and print outlets around the world.

Several times a year we run brief campaigns to ask our readers to pitch in—and thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Our 2019 Mid-Year Campaign is underway. Can you help? We can't do it without you.

Please select a donation method:

Share This Article