Published on
Huffington Post Investigative Fund

Cities Sue Manufacturer of Weed-Killer Found in Tap Water

Federal Lawsuit Seeks Funding to Remove Atrazine from Water Supply

Danielle Ivory

A coalition of communities in six Midwestern states filed a federal lawsuit Monday seeking to force the manufacturer of a widely-used herbicide to pay for its removal from drinking water.

Atrazine, a weed-killer sprayed primarily on cornfields, can run off
into rivers and streams that supply municipal water systems. As the
Huffington Post Investigative Fund reported in a  series of  articles last  fall,
the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency failed to notify the public
that atrazine had been found at levels above the federal safety limit
in drinking water in at least four states.

The lawsuit was filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern
District of Illinois by 16 cities in Kansas, Illinois, Indiana, Ohio,
Missouri, and Iowa.  The communities allege that Swiss corporation
Syngenta AG and its Delaware counterpart Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc.
reaped billions of dollars from the sale of atrazine while local
taxpayers were left with the financial burden of filtering the chemical
from drinking water.

Many water utility managers  told the Investigative Fund that they could not afford the expensive carbon filters that are needed to remove atrazine.

Syngenta spokesman Paul Minehart told the Investigative Fund that
the company had not yet received word of a federal action, but said
that current levels of atrazine in drinking water are safe.

"What Syngenta can say is that EPA re-registered atrazine in 2006,
stating it would cause no harm to the general population," Minehart
said. "In the current economy many organizations, including water
systems, are looking for additional sources of revenue.  It is not
surprising that some water systems would say they cannot afford
additional filtering but, for atrazine, there is no need."

Atrazine has long been a controversial product. The European Union
in 2004 banned its use, saying there was not enough information to
prove its safety. The EPA recently  announced that
it would be re-evaluating the herbicide's ability to cause cancer and
birth defects, as well as its potential to disrupt the hormone and
reproductive systems of humans and amphibians.

Last week, a study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Science  reported that
male frogs exposed to levels of atrazine below federal limits could
become functional females, with the ability to mate and lay eggs.

Citizens in all sixteen of the cities named in the lawsuit get their
drinking water from sources next to or surrounded by agricultural
fields where farmers use atrazine. Some of these cities sell their
water in bulk to other nearby towns.

According to EPA data from 2008, at least two of the cities --
Coulterville, Ill. and Monroeville, Ohio -- found atrazine in their
river water at levels above 30 parts per billion (ppb). To comply with
federal law, the level of atrazine in drinking water must not exceed
3ppb on annual average.

Lawyer Stephen Tillery, who is representing the sixteen cities in
this complaint, said that these cities alone have spent upwards of $350
million trying to filter atrazine from their drinking water.

Investigative Fund reporter Danielle Ivory discussed atrazine last fall on the TV program Democracy Now. To watch, click  here.

Illinois Class Action Complaint Against Syngenta

This is the world we live in. This is the world we cover.

Because of people like you, another world is possible. There are many battles to be won, but we will battle them together—all of us. Common Dreams is not your normal news site. We don't survive on clicks. We don't want advertising dollars. We want the world to be a better place. But we can't do it alone. It doesn't work that way. We need you. If you can help today—because every gift of every size matters—please do.

Share This Article

More in: