Published on
Radio France International

Death On All Sides as NATO Offensive Begins

The Marjah Offensive - What are The Prospects?

Tony Cross

An Afghan villager, who was not detained, at the first compound that the Marines seized during an assault into Marja, a Taliban stronghold in Helmand Province. (Tyler Hicks/The New York Times)

No sooner had combat begun
than both sides were claiming to have inflicted losses on their
enemies. The Nato-led troops claimed to have killed five Taliban, while
the rebels said they had killed six foreign soldiers.

Operation Mushtarak
("Together" in Dari) aims to secure Marjah district, a long-time
Taliban bastion which is also reported to provide ten per cent of the
world's opium.

British Defence Minister Bob Ainsworth declared
that "casualties are something that we have to expect", while British
Engineer Group commander Lieutenant Colonel Matt Bazeley warned that
"it is bloody dangerous out there".

"We are going into the heart of darkness," he told his troops.

forces number 15,000, while estimates of Taliban numbers vary between
400 and 2,000. But the rebels have the advantage of having occupied the
area for years, being hard to distinguish from civilians and,
apparently, having good enough relations with local people
to lead generals to fear that many may shelter Taliban fighters.

The Afghan and international troops of Isaf
did not even try to profit from the element of suprise, announcing that
the offensive would take place several days before it began.

western troops trumpet their intentions or not, the Taliban know when
their enemies will launch their attacks," says Gilles Dorronsoro, of
the Carnegie Peace Foundation.

Instead, the offensive was
preceded by a welter of press releases, perhaps aiming to convince the
public in the US and UK that something serious was going on. And
helicopters dropped leaflets on the target area, warning the population
to stay indoors, rather than flee. 

But rights campaigners fear that there will be civilian casualties.

suspect that they believe they have the ability to generally
distinguish between combatants and civilians,' says Brad Adams of Human Rights Watch. "I would call that into question, given their long history of mistakes, particularly when using air power."

The Wall Street Journal
reports that "frustration is boiling over" among frontline troops
over more restrictive combat rules than those in place in Iraq.

"The line between peaceful villager and enemy fighter is often blurred," an editorial in the paper says.

Although civilian deaths
are a source of enormous resentment in Afghanistan, the strategists
insist they want to win hearts and minds. They plan to hand over power
to pro-government officials as swiftly as possible, in line with
President Hamid Karzai's repeated calls for "Afghanisation".

are going to arrive with Afghan governance as the tip of the spear,"
British General Nick Carter, who is the Nato commander for southern
Afghanistan, told the BBC.

principal aim of the offensive is to drive the Taliban out of Marjah,
preferably forcing them right down to the southern border with Pakistan.

A decisive
military defeat in Helmand would limit them to neighbouring Kandahar
province, the western strategists hope. The aim is to hammer the rebels
during this year's troop build-up, allowing withdrawal to start in 2011.

This is not the first offensive in Helmand.

When the British took over security in the province in 2006 their brief was modest - to control two population centres.

the British general in charge at the time all of a sudden decided to
clean up the whole of Helmand province," says the Carnegie Peace
Foundation's Dorronsoro. "It was a disaster."

"Then every year
since you have a new offensive, which is to say that the only thing
which explains this overinvestment in Helmand was the initial offensive
which was compensated for by victory."

The model for Operation Mushtarak is Operation Khanjar ("dagger" in Dari and Pashtu), last summer's offensive in Garmser and Nawa districts.

was judged a success as most of the Taliban fled, while heavily armed
troops set up posts in key settlements and junctions. That was quickly
followed by meetings, in which the pro-government forces' intention of
staying was impressed on local elders.

But it failed in its aim to ensure security in August's presidential election, in
which fraud was widespread in the south. Troops continue to suffer
casualties from improvised explosive devices (IEDs), which they are
also likely to face in Marjah.

US and Nato commander General
Stanley McChrystal has promised to follow military gains with
development and aid. Government officials, police and army are poised
to follow the combat troops into Marjah to establish control, according
to Helmand governor Mohammad Gulab Mangal. 

This time, the leaders of the pro-government forces insist, they intend to win and they intend to stay.

This is the world we live in. This is the world we cover.

Because of people like you, another world is possible. There are many battles to be won, but we will battle them together—all of us. Common Dreams is not your normal news site. We don't survive on clicks. We don't want advertising dollars. We want the world to be a better place. But we can't do it alone. It doesn't work that way. We need you. If you can help today—because every gift of every size matters—please do.

Share This Article

More in: