Published on
The Huffington Post

Obama Scoffed at McCain's Spending Freeze Proposal During Campaign

Sam Stein

It didn't take long for the critics to come out in force -- and on YouTube -- against the Obama administration's just-leaked plan to propose a three-year freeze in discretionary, "non-security" spending as part of the upcoming budget.

Some Democrats scoffed at the idea, calling it the wrong approach
during a time of deep economic recession. Republicans depicted it as a
political gambit destined to be shot down by a non-compliant Congress.

One particularly tough attack, however, was delivered in Obama's own
words -- in the form of a video compilation showing the president
scoffing at just such a proposal in three successive presidential
campaign debates. The video was posted quickly on YouTube.

"The problem with a spending freeze is you're using a hatchet where
you need a scalpel. There are some programs that are very important
that are underfunded," Obama says in his first debate against
Republican candidate John McCain, who was pushing a spending freeze.

"That is an example of an unfair burden sharing," Obama says of
McCain's proposal in the second debate. "That's using a hatchet to cut
the federal budget. I want to use a scalpel so that people who need
help are getting help and those of us like myself and Senator McCain
who don't need help aren't getting it. That is how we make sure that
everybody is willing to make a few sacrifices."

"It sounds good," Obama says of the proposal during the third
debate. "It is proposed periodically. It doesn't happen. And in fact an
across-the-board spending freeze is a hatchet and we do need a scalpel
because there are some programs that don't work at all. There are some
programs that are underfunded and I want to make sure that we are
focused on those programs that work."

The administration's argument that it is not backtracking on a
campaign pledge seems likely to rest on the use of the term
"across-the-board." Obama's proposed cap for discretionary, non-defense
spending would allow for some agencies and programs to get additional
funding, on the condition that it comes from another agency.

"This is not a blunt, across-the-board freeze," said a senior
administration official. "Some agencies will go up, others will go
down; but in aggregate for those non-security agencies the total will
remain constant."

As for the political dynamics, they clearly have changed since the
campaign. Still stinging from the Democratic Party's loss of Ted
Kennedy's Massachusetts Senate seat, the White House is apparently
choosing to respond to a rise in anti-government sentiment by making a
new show of commitment to fiscal discipline.

The president, a senior adviser said, made the decision to propose
the spending freeze after consultation with many advisers, in which he
came to the conclusion that the government "can't spend more money than
it has; that it has to make some decisions about what is vital."

"Do I think this is going to win us lots of kudos among some on Capitol Hill?" the official added. "No."

This is the world we live in. This is the world we cover.

Because of people like you, another world is possible. There are many battles to be won, but we will battle them together—all of us. Common Dreams is not your normal news site. We don't survive on clicks. We don't want advertising dollars. We want the world to be a better place. But we can't do it alone. It doesn't work that way. We need you. If you can help today—because every gift of every size matters—please do.

Share This Article

More in: