The next United Nations climate change conference is almost a year
away, and health care is still dominating the legislative agenda in
Washington. That means climate reform opponents, from the coal industry
to the global warming skeptics, have plenty of time to work, out of the
spotlight, to derail progress. Here's a glimpse of the enemies of
reform-and the companies and individuals that are still fighting for
change in 2010.
Take the case of Cape Wind, an offshore wind farm planned for
Massachusetts' Nantucket Sound, as an example. The project faced yet
another roadblock this week, when the National Park Service said the
site could be listed as a historical place, prized by Nantucket's
Native American tribes. But as Kate Sheppard writes in Mother Jones,
the park service's decision counts as a victory for a less sympathetic
opponent as well. William Koch is the founder and president of the
Oxbow Group, a privately-held group of companies, and he has laid out
more than a million dollars to fight Cape Wind.
"Koch ... has made his fortune off mining and marketing coal, natural
gas, petroleum, and petroleum coke products," Sheppard explains. "He's
the son of Fred Koch, founder of oil and gas giant Koch Industries, and
brother of David and Charles Koch-who have supported conservative
groups like Citizens for a Sound Economy (which later merged with
another group to form FreedomWorks) and Americans for Prosperity, which
has campaigned against both climate legislation and health care reform."
Mother Jones is also on the case of the Atlas Foundation, a
think tank that promotes climate change skepticism (and also receives
funding from Koch). Josh Harkinson
examines this group and other foundations that are supporting "a loose
network of some 500 similar organizations in dozens of countries" and
that are in turn financed by "carbon-spewing American industries." The
Atlas Economic Research Foundation alone has supported more than 30
other foreign think tanks that buy into climate change skepticism,
"The foreign groups' finances are opaque, yet an Atlas Foundation
spokesman acknowledges that some of them wouldn't exist without dollars
being pumped in," Harkinson writes. "In the coming months, these groups
will lead the fight in their own countries to derail the shaky deal
made in Copenhagen-which will likely prompt American skeptics to cite
widespread international opposition to taking action on climate change."
Of course, the skeptics do have opponents, including the solar and
wind power industries that stand to gain from climate change
legislation. One group that can be added to that list: Farmers. Lynda Washington
of the Iowa Independent reports that "most, but not all, [agricultural]
producers will benefit from the package passed earlier this year by the
U.S. House of Representatives," according to a new study by Kansas
State University (KSU) researchers.
The American Farmland Trust, which funded the KSU study, will have
plenty of strange bedfellows as it lobbies Congress on climate change
legislation. Amy Goodman of
Democracy Now! reports that the groups joining the battle on Capitol
Hill include "venture capitalists, the natural gas lobby, America's
most iconic soup maker Campbell Soup," according to a new analysis of
"The sheer range of interests registered to lobby on climate change
is expected to create further delays in the Senate's effort to complete
a successful bill to curb fossil fuel emissions," Goodman explains.
Over the next year, the fight for strong climate policy won't just
take place in Washington. On a state and local level, governments,
independent organizations and individuals will work towards turning
back global warming. As Mark Herstgaard points out in The Nation:
"Hundreds of local and regional governments have also implemented
ambitious green energy programs ahead of federal policy. A pioneer of
this effort, California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger announced in
Copenhagen the formation of the R-20 Group-twenty regions around the
world that will 'set high standards for cutting carbon and creating
green economies, then invite others to join them,' in the words of
Terry Tamminen, the California governor's former environment adviser."
And in Yes! Magazine, Tara Lohan
writes that some cities "have long been ahead of Congress and the White
House on climate commitments ... committing to Kyoto goals in 2005
through the U.S. Conference of Mayors Climate Protection Agreement."
"But the community climate movement goes beyond local government
initiatives," Lohan explains. "It's a cultural shift involving people
at all levels of the community, from tiny rural towns in red states to
major metropolitan areas."
In one California town, that shift promoted Catherine Sutton to
start Transition Albany, a project that encourages the town's residents
to consider new ways to face climate change and dwindling oil supplies,
reports Pamela O'Malley Chang at Yes! Magazine.
And in Iowa, "Lonnie Gamble, who lives in a solar and wind powered
straw bale home in this Jefferson County community, hasn't paid a gas
or electric bill in two decades," writes Beth Dalbey
for the Iowa Independent. Gamble is just one resident of Fairfield, IA,
who is helping to "institutionalize sustainable living", while
""blazing a trail" for other small Iowa cities," Dalbey reports.
One small thing anyone can do to move towards climate change reform: This winter, remind everyone, as Cord Jefferson does at Campus Progress, that, yes, it's cold, but that doesn't mean global warming isn't real.
"As the World Meteorological Organization has said for years,"
Jefferson reminds us, "global warming and cool temperatures go together
like cocoa and marshmallows."