Oct 05, 2009
The White House has said for the first time that it does not expect to see a climate change bill this year, removing one of the key elements for reaching an international agreement to avoid catastrophic global warming.
In
a seminar in Washington, Barack Obama's main energy adviser, Carol
Browner, gave the clearest indication to date that the administration
did not expect the Senate to vote on a climate change bill before an
international meeting in Copenhagen in December.
Browner spoke
barely 48 hours after Senate Democrats staged a campaign-style rally in
support of a climate change bill that seeks to cut US emissions by 20%
on 2005 levels by 2020.
"Obviously, we'd like to be through the
process, but that's not going to happen," Browner told a conference
hosted by the Atlantic magazine on Friday. "I think we would all agree
the likelihood that you'd have a bill signed by the president on
comprehensive energy by the time we go in December is not likely."
Browner's
bleak assessment deepens concerns that negotiations, already
deadlocked, will fail to produce a meaningful agreement in Copenhagen.
It also threatens to further dampen the prospects for a bill that was
struggling for support among conservative and rustbelt Democrats.
The
UN has cast the Copenhagen meeting as a last chance for countries to
reach an agreement to avoid the most disastrous effects of warming.
Negotiators - including the state department's climate change envoy -
admit it will be far harder to reach such a deal unless America,
historically the world's biggest polluter, shows it is willing to cut
its own greenhouse gas emissions.
Browner's comments undercut a
campaign by Democratic leaders in the Senate, corporations and
environmental organisations to try to build momentum behind the bill.
The day before Browner's comments, John Kerry, the former presidential
candidate who is one of the sponsors of the cap-and-trade bill, told a
conference he remained confident the bill would squeak through the
Senate.
Her remarks also raise further doubts about how forcefully the Obama administration is willing to press the Senate for a climate bill in the midst of its struggles over healthcare.
In
the last two weeks, diplomats have grown increasingly frustrated with
the administration. Negotiators say they understand Obama would have to
struggle to get this agenda through the Senate, but say the president
has shied away from opportunities to make the case for climate change.
Obama came in for harsh criticism from environmental organisations for failing to urge the Senate to act during a speech to the United Nations summit on climate change late last month. Environmental groups called it a "missed opportunity".
"If
there is no serious US legislation in place then we will have
delegations arriving and getting increasingly frustrated with nothing
happening," said John Bruton, the European Union's ambassador.
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today! |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
The White House has said for the first time that it does not expect to see a climate change bill this year, removing one of the key elements for reaching an international agreement to avoid catastrophic global warming.
In
a seminar in Washington, Barack Obama's main energy adviser, Carol
Browner, gave the clearest indication to date that the administration
did not expect the Senate to vote on a climate change bill before an
international meeting in Copenhagen in December.
Browner spoke
barely 48 hours after Senate Democrats staged a campaign-style rally in
support of a climate change bill that seeks to cut US emissions by 20%
on 2005 levels by 2020.
"Obviously, we'd like to be through the
process, but that's not going to happen," Browner told a conference
hosted by the Atlantic magazine on Friday. "I think we would all agree
the likelihood that you'd have a bill signed by the president on
comprehensive energy by the time we go in December is not likely."
Browner's
bleak assessment deepens concerns that negotiations, already
deadlocked, will fail to produce a meaningful agreement in Copenhagen.
It also threatens to further dampen the prospects for a bill that was
struggling for support among conservative and rustbelt Democrats.
The
UN has cast the Copenhagen meeting as a last chance for countries to
reach an agreement to avoid the most disastrous effects of warming.
Negotiators - including the state department's climate change envoy -
admit it will be far harder to reach such a deal unless America,
historically the world's biggest polluter, shows it is willing to cut
its own greenhouse gas emissions.
Browner's comments undercut a
campaign by Democratic leaders in the Senate, corporations and
environmental organisations to try to build momentum behind the bill.
The day before Browner's comments, John Kerry, the former presidential
candidate who is one of the sponsors of the cap-and-trade bill, told a
conference he remained confident the bill would squeak through the
Senate.
Her remarks also raise further doubts about how forcefully the Obama administration is willing to press the Senate for a climate bill in the midst of its struggles over healthcare.
In
the last two weeks, diplomats have grown increasingly frustrated with
the administration. Negotiators say they understand Obama would have to
struggle to get this agenda through the Senate, but say the president
has shied away from opportunities to make the case for climate change.
Obama came in for harsh criticism from environmental organisations for failing to urge the Senate to act during a speech to the United Nations summit on climate change late last month. Environmental groups called it a "missed opportunity".
"If
there is no serious US legislation in place then we will have
delegations arriving and getting increasingly frustrated with nothing
happening," said John Bruton, the European Union's ambassador.
The White House has said for the first time that it does not expect to see a climate change bill this year, removing one of the key elements for reaching an international agreement to avoid catastrophic global warming.
In
a seminar in Washington, Barack Obama's main energy adviser, Carol
Browner, gave the clearest indication to date that the administration
did not expect the Senate to vote on a climate change bill before an
international meeting in Copenhagen in December.
Browner spoke
barely 48 hours after Senate Democrats staged a campaign-style rally in
support of a climate change bill that seeks to cut US emissions by 20%
on 2005 levels by 2020.
"Obviously, we'd like to be through the
process, but that's not going to happen," Browner told a conference
hosted by the Atlantic magazine on Friday. "I think we would all agree
the likelihood that you'd have a bill signed by the president on
comprehensive energy by the time we go in December is not likely."
Browner's
bleak assessment deepens concerns that negotiations, already
deadlocked, will fail to produce a meaningful agreement in Copenhagen.
It also threatens to further dampen the prospects for a bill that was
struggling for support among conservative and rustbelt Democrats.
The
UN has cast the Copenhagen meeting as a last chance for countries to
reach an agreement to avoid the most disastrous effects of warming.
Negotiators - including the state department's climate change envoy -
admit it will be far harder to reach such a deal unless America,
historically the world's biggest polluter, shows it is willing to cut
its own greenhouse gas emissions.
Browner's comments undercut a
campaign by Democratic leaders in the Senate, corporations and
environmental organisations to try to build momentum behind the bill.
The day before Browner's comments, John Kerry, the former presidential
candidate who is one of the sponsors of the cap-and-trade bill, told a
conference he remained confident the bill would squeak through the
Senate.
Her remarks also raise further doubts about how forcefully the Obama administration is willing to press the Senate for a climate bill in the midst of its struggles over healthcare.
In
the last two weeks, diplomats have grown increasingly frustrated with
the administration. Negotiators say they understand Obama would have to
struggle to get this agenda through the Senate, but say the president
has shied away from opportunities to make the case for climate change.
Obama came in for harsh criticism from environmental organisations for failing to urge the Senate to act during a speech to the United Nations summit on climate change late last month. Environmental groups called it a "missed opportunity".
"If
there is no serious US legislation in place then we will have
delegations arriving and getting increasingly frustrated with nothing
happening," said John Bruton, the European Union's ambassador.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.