Published on
The New York Times

American Antiwar Movement Plans an Autumn Campaign Against Policies on Afghanistan

James Dao

A restive antiwar movement, largely dormant since the election of Barack Obama, is preparing a nationwide campaign this fall to challenge the administration’s policies on Afghanistan.

Anticipating a Pentagon request for more troops there, antiwar
leaders have engaged in a flurry of meetings to discuss a month of
demonstrations, lobbying, teach-ins and memorials in October to
publicize the casualty count, raise concerns about the cost of the war
and pressure Congress to demand an exit strategy.

But they face a starkly changed political climate from just a year ago, when President George W. Bush
provided a lightning rod for protests. The health care battle is
consuming the resources of labor unions and other core Democratic
groups. American troops are leaving Iraq, defusing antiwar sentiments
in some quarters. The recession
has hurt fund-raising for peace groups and forced them to slash
budgets. And, perhaps most significant, many liberals continue to
support Mr. Obama, or at least are hesitant about openly criticizing

“People do not want to take on the administration,” said Jon Soltz, chairman of “Generating the kind of money that would be required to challenge the president’s policies just isn’t going to happen.”

Tom Andrews, national director for an antiwar coalition, Win
Without War, said most liberals “want this guy to succeed.” But he said
the antiwar movement would try to convince liberals that a prolonged
war would undermine Mr. Obama’s domestic agenda. Afghanistan, he said,
“could be a devastating albatross around the president’s neck.”

But there is also a sense among some antiwar advocates that Mr.
Obama’s honeymoon with Democrats in general and liberals in particular
is ending. As evidence, they point to a recent Washington Post/ABC News
showing that 51 percent of Americans now feel the war in Afghanistan is
not worth fighting, a 10-point increase since March. The poll had a
margin of sampling error of plus or minus three percentage points.

“We’re coming out of a low period,” said Medea Benjamin, co-founder of the antiwar group Code Pink.
“But as progressives feel more comfortable protesting against the Obama
administration and challenging Democrats as well as Republicans in
Congress, then we’ll be back on track.”

The Obama administration has opposed legislation
requiring an exit strategy, saying it needs time to develop new
approaches to the war. “Given his own impatience for progress, the
president has demanded benchmarks to track our progress and ensure that
we are moving in the right direction,” a White House official said,
speaking on condition of anonymity.

The October protest schedule is expected to include marches in
Washington and elsewhere. But organizers acknowledge that it may be
difficult to recruit large numbers of demonstrators. So groups like United
for Peace and Justice are also planning smaller events in communities
around the country, including teach-ins with veterans and families of
deployed troops, lobbying sessions with members of Congress, film
screenings and ad hoc memorials featuring the boots of deceased
soldiers and Marines.

“There are some that feel betrayed” by Mr. Obama, said Nancy Lessin, a founder of the group Military Families Speak Out.
“There are some who feel that powerful forces are pushing the president
to stay on this course and that we have to build a more powerful
movement to change that course.”

The October actions will be timed not only to the eighth anniversary of the first American airstrikes on Taliban forces and the seventh anniversary of Congressional authorization for invading Iraq, but also an anticipated debate in Congress over sending more troops to Afghanistan. Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal, the commander of American forces in Afghanistan, is widely expected to request additional troops, beyond the 68,000 projected for the end of the year, after finalizing a policy review in the next few weeks.

The antiwar movement consists of dozens of organizations
representing pacifists, veterans, military families, labor unions and
religious groups, and they hardly speak with one voice. Some groups
like Iraq Veterans
Against the War have started shifting their focus toward Afghanistan,
passing resolutions demanding an immediate withdrawal of troops from
there. Others, like, support the American military presence in Afghanistan, calling it crucial to fighting terrorism.


Never Miss a Beat.

Get our best delivered to your inbox.

And some groups, including, have yet to take a clear position on Afghanistan beyond warning that war drains resources from domestic programs.

“There is not the passion around Afghanistan that we saw around Iraq,” said Ilyse Hogue,’s spokeswoman. “But there are questions.”

There are also signs that some groups that have been relatively
quiet on Afghanistan are preparing to become louder. U.S. Labor Against
the War,
a network of nearly 190 union affiliates that has been focused on Iraq,
is “moving more into full opposition to the continuing occupation” of
Afghanistan, said Michael Eisenscher, the group’s national coordinator.

President Obama
risks his entire domestic agenda, just as Johnson did in Vietnam, in
pursuing this course of action in Afghanistan,” Mr. Eisenscher said.

Handfuls of antiwar protestors can still be seen on Capitol Hill,
outside state office buildings and around college campuses. Cindy
Sheehan, for instance, has set up her vigil on Martha’s Vineyard while
Mr. Obama vacations there. But many advocates say a lower-key approach
may be more effective in winning support right now.

An example of that strategy is an Internet film titled “Rethink
Afghanistan,” which is being produced and released in segments by the
political documentary filmmaker Robert Greenwald. In six episodes so
far, Mr. Greenwald has used interviews with academics, Afghans and
former C.I.A.
operatives to raise questions about civilian casualties, women’s
rights, the cost of war and whether it has made the United States safer.

The episodes, some as short as two minutes, are circulated via Twitter, YouTube, Facebook
and blogs. Antiwar groups are also screening them with members of
Congress. Mr. Greenwald, who has produced documentaries about Wal-Mart
and war profiteers, said the film represented a “less incendiary”
approach influenced by liberal concerns that he not attack Mr. Obama

“We lost funding from liberals who didn’t want to criticize Obama,” he said. “It’s been lonely out there.”

Code Pink is trying to build opposition to the war among women’s
groups, some of which argue that women will suffer if the Taliban
returns. In September, a group of Code Pink organizers will visit Kabul
to encourage Afghan women to speak out against the American military
presence there.

And Iraq Veterans Against the War is using the Web to circulate episodes of a documentary, “This Is Where We Take Our Stand,”
filmed in 2008 at its Winter Soldier conference, at which veterans from
Iraq and Afghanistan testified about civilian casualties, combat stress
and other tolls of the wars.

The group’s leaders say they do not expect many people to take to
the barricades against the administration any time soon. But that will
change, they argue, as the death toll continues to rise.

“In the next year, it will more and more become Obama’s war,” said
Perry O’Brien, president of the New York chapter of Iraq Veterans
Against the War. “He’ll be held responsible for the bloodshed.”

This is the world we live in. This is the world we cover.

Because of people like you, another world is possible. There are many battles to be won, but we will battle them together—all of us. Common Dreams is not your normal news site. We don't survive on clicks. We don't want advertising dollars. We want the world to be a better place. But we can't do it alone. It doesn't work that way. We need you. If you can help today—because every gift of every size matters—please do. Without Your Support We Simply Don't Exist.

Please select a donation method:

Share This Article