Published on
The Washington Post

Iraq May Hold Vote On US Withdrawal

As American Focus Turns to North, Troops Could Be Forced to Leave Early

Ernesto Londoño

BAGHDAD -- U.S. troops could be forced by Iraqi voters to
withdraw a year ahead of schedule under a referendum the Iraqi
government backed Monday, creating a potential complication for
American commanders concerned about rising violence in the country's

Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki's move appeared to disregard the
wishes of the U.S. government, which has quietly lobbied against the
plebiscite. American officials fear it could lead to the annulment of
an agreement allowing U.S. troops to stay until the end of 2011, and
instead force them out by the start of that year.

The Maliki government's announcement came on the day that the top U.S. general in Iraq
proposed a plan to deploy troops to disputed areas in the restive
north, a clear indication that the military sees a continuing need for
U.S. forces even if Iraqis no longer want them here.

Gen. Ray Odierno said American troops would partner with contingents
of the Iraqi army and the Kurdish regional government's paramilitary
force, marking the first organized effort to pair U.S. forces with the
militia, known as the pesh merga. Iraqi army and Kurdish forces nearly
came to blows recently, and there is deep-seated animosity between
them, owing to a decades-long fight over ancestry, land and oil.

If Iraqi lawmakers sign off on Maliki's initiative to hold a
referendum in January on the withdrawal timeline, a majority of voters
could annul a standing U.S.-Iraqi security agreement, forcing the
military to pull out completely by January 2011 under the terms of a
previous law.

It is unclear whether parliament, which is in recess until next
month, would approve the referendum. Lawmakers have yet to pass a
measure laying the basic ground rules for the Jan. 16 national
election, their top legislative priority for the remainder of 2009.

Before signing off on the U.S.-Iraqi security agreement last year,
Iraqi lawmakers demanded that voters get to weigh in on the pact in a
referendum that was to take place no later than last month. Because it
did not happen, American officials assumed the plebiscite was a dead

U.S. officials say they have no way to know how the referendum would
turn out, but they worry that many Iraqis are likely to vote against
the pact. Maliki billed the withdrawal of U.S. forces from urban areas
at the end of June as a "great victory" for Iraqis, and his government
has since markedly curbed the authority and mobility of U.S. forces.

Senior Pentagon officials who spoke on the condition of anonymity
said that Odierno probably will make an announcement later this week or
early next week the accelerating the withdrawal of U.S. forces, which
now stand at 130,000, by one or two brigades between now and the end of
the year. Each brigade consists of about 5,000 troops. Odierno said
Monday that he has not decided whether to speed up the plan, which he
said remains on schedule.

The acceleration would still be much slower than if the referendum nullified the agreement.

Still, senior Pentagon officials played down Maliki's announcement,
saying it was an expected part of Iraq's political process. Senior
Iraqi officials did not raise the possibility of the referendum with
Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates when he visited the country earlier
this month, Pentagon officials said.

Bahaa Hassan, who owns a mobile phone store in Najaf, south of Baghdad, said he would vote for a speedier withdrawal.

"We want to get rid of the American influence in Iraq, because we
suffer from it politically and economically," he said. "We will vote
against it so Iraq will be in the hands of Iraqis again."

But many Iraqis, particularly Sunnis and Kurds, consider the
presence of the U.S. military a key deterrent to abuses of power by the
Shiite-led government.

"After six years of Shiite rule and struggle, we still have no
electricity, so what will happen if Americans leave?" said Dhirgham
Talib, a government employee in Najaf. "The field will be left to the
Shiite parties to do whatever they want with no fear from anybody."

A poll commissioned by the U.S. military earlier this year found
that Iraqis expressed far less confidence in American troops than in
the Iraqi government or any of its security forces. Twenty-seven
percent of Iraqis polled said they had confidence in U.S. forces,
according to a Pentagon report presented to Congress last month. By
contrast, 72 percent expressed confidence in the national government.

Zainab Karim, a Shiite lawmaker from the Sadrist movement, the most
ardently anti-American faction, said she was pleasantly surprised that
the government is backing the referendum.

"I consider this a good thing," she said. "But we have to wait and
see whether the government is honest about this or whether it is
electoral propaganda."

As the Iraqi government took steps to force U.S. troops out earlier
than planned, Odierno said Monday that he would like to deploy American
forces to villages along disputed areas in northern Iraq to defuse
tension between Kurdish troops and forces controlled by the Shiite
Arab-led government in Baghdad.

"We're working very hard to come up with a security architecture in
the disputed territories that would reduce tension," Odierno told
reporters. "They just all feel more comfortable if we're there."

Scores of Iraqis have been killed in recent weeks in villages along
the 300-mile frontier south of the Kurdish region. U.S. military
officials say the attacks bear the hallmarks of Sunni extremists, but
local leaders have traded accusations to bolster their positions on
whether specific areas should be under the control of Baghdad or the
autonomous government of Kurdistan.

The pesh merga currently controls some villages that are nominally
outside the three-province Kurdish region. The expansion of Kurdish
influence in northern Iraq has prompted Maliki to deploy more troops
loyal to Baghdad to northern provinces south of Kurdistan. The new
provincial leadership in Nineveh province, the most restive among them,
has made curbing Kurdish expansion its top priority and has called for
the expulsion of pesh merga forces.

The tension, Odierno said, has created a security vacuum that has
emboldened al-Qaeda in Iraq, a Sunni insurgent group that he said was
almost certainly responsible for recent sensational bombings in the
province. The number of civilian casualties in Iraq has increased since
the urban pullout, Odierno said, largely as a result of attacks in the
disputed territories.

"What we have is al-Qaeda exploiting this fissure between the Arabs
and the Kurds," he said. "What we're trying to do is close that

Staff writers Greg Jaffe and Scott Wilson in Washington and special
correspondents Zaid Sabah and Aziz Alwan in Baghdad, Saad Sarhan in
Najaf, and Dlovan Brwari in Mosul contributed to this report.

This is the world we live in. This is the world we cover.

Because of people like you, another world is possible. There are many battles to be won, but we will battle them together—all of us. Common Dreams is not your normal news site. We don't survive on clicks. We don't want advertising dollars. We want the world to be a better place. But we can't do it alone. It doesn't work that way. We need you. If you can help today—because every gift of every size matters—please do. Without Your Support We Simply Won't Exist.

Share This Article

More in: