Published on

EPA Administrator Forecasts Potential Shift on Bush-Era Drilling Loophole

Joaquin Sapien

Administrator of the US Environmental Protection Agency Lisa Jackson gives a press conference during a G8 environment meeting in Siracusa, Sicily. (AFP/Str)

Signaling the potential for an important policy reversal,
Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lisa Jackson said in a
congressional hearing on Tuesday that the agency would consider
revisiting its controversial position that a popular natural gas
drilling technique doesn't harm groundwater.

A 2004 study [1] (PDF) conducted by the EPA concluded that hydraulic fracturing [2]
-- a process that involves pummeling the earth with millions of gallons
of water mixed with sand and chemicals to extract natural gas -- causes
"no threat" to underground drinking water.

The study is often used by the gas industry to rebut concerns over
drinking water contamination. It was also the main basis for a
provision in a 2005 energy bill that exempts hydraulic fracturing from
regulation under the Safe Drinking Water Act. The bill says the process
is exempt because it doesn't harm groundwater. Opponents of the
exemption are trying to repeal it, and a new study from the EPA would
add muscle to their argument.

A ProPublica investigation [3] co-published with BusinessWeek [4]
last November identified serious flaws in the EPA's 2004 study. We
found that the agency negotiated directly with the gas industry before
finalizing its conclusions and ignored evidence that the process might
indeed contaminate water supplies.

Rep. Maurice Hinchey (D-NY) expressed concern [5]
about these issues and recent reports of contamination near drill
sites. At a House Appropriations Subcommittee on Interior hearing on
Tuesday, he asked Jackson [6] whether the emerging evidence would prompt the EPA to revise its previous conclusions.

Jackson said she recognized that the current regulations restrict the
EPA's ability to protect groundwater and said the issue "was well worth
looking into." But she didn't say how the EPA would approach the
problem or whether the 2004 study would be revised.

A spokesperson for Jackson would not elaborate on her remarks.

The statement has stirred optimism [7]
among environmentalists who have been urging the EPA and Congress to
repeal the exemption. They feel it's a sign that the Obama
administration is willing to take a fresh look at the Bush
administration's legacy on gas drilling.

"Big ships turn slowly," said Bruce Baizel, an attorney with the Oil and Gas Accountability Project [8],
"but I think this is the first time EPA has acknowledged that maybe
their previous conclusions were not entirely supported by sound

Industry representatives contend that fracturing is safe and dispute
the claim that the process has been linked to water contamination. They
also maintain that fracturing is best regulated by individual states,
rather than the federal government.

"The EPA study is one of several studies done by a variety of different
interests in the past decade, and I don't believe that there is any
compelling evidence that the risk has changed since 2004," said Lee
Fuller, vice president of government relations for the Independent Petroleum Association of America [9]. "The reports mentioned (in the hearing) have been analyzed to show that they are not related to hydraulic fracturing."

This is the world we live in. This is the world we cover.

Because of people like you, another world is possible. There are many battles to be won, but we will battle them together—all of us. Common Dreams is not your normal news site. We don't survive on clicks. We don't want advertising dollars. We want the world to be a better place. But we can't do it alone. It doesn't work that way. We need you. If you can help today—because every gift of every size matters—please do. Without Your Support We Won't Exist.

Please select a donation method:

Share This Article