LONDON - British security agents sent an undercover mole dubbed the ‘Muslim
007’ to convince Al Qaeda suspect Binyam Mohamed to turn informant if
he wanted his torture to end, it was claimed last night.
allegations suggest Britain’s involvement in the ‘medieval’ treatment
of the former Guantanamo Bay prisoner goes much deeper than previously
Ministers and MI5 have insisted they had no idea that
Mohamed was the subject of an ‘extraordinary rendition’ to Morocco, nor
that he was tortured there on the orders of the CIA.
last night Mohamed told how the mole, known only as Informant A, tried
to persuade him that giving intelligence to the British would end his
ordeal – suggesting MI5 agents were complicit in his treatment.
said that his torturers brought the mole, a UK citizen of Moroccan
descent, to see him in early September 2002, nearly two months after he
arrived in Morocco, where he had been subjected to horrific abuse,
including the cutting of his genitals with a scalpel.
was one of my lowest points,’ he said. ‘The really bad stuff had
already been going on for weeks. I thought he was a friendly face who
might get the British to help me – but it was just another way of
putting on pressure.’
Mohamed’s lawyer, Clive Stafford Smith,
added: ‘The Moroccans told Mohamed that Informant A was working with
the British Government and pressed Mr Mohamed to do the same if he
wanted to end his torture.’
Mr Stafford Smith has written to
Gordon Brown demanding an immediate inquiry, calling on the Government
to come clean about British involvement in the case and ‘quit working
with the US to hide evidence of criminal acts’.
line is that the British authorities had no idea that Mohamed was taken
to Morocco three months after his capture in Pakistan in April 2002 –
and became aware of him again only when he arrived at Guantanamo Bay
more than two years later.
Mr Stafford Smith’s letter says:
‘The suggestion that British officials simply lost track of Mohamed for
more than two years and did not know that he had been rendered to
Morocco for torture is implausible.
‘They had their own
agent in Morocco who had seen Mohamed there and that person was back in
the UK while the razor blades were still being taken to Mohamed’s
SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT
Our Summer Campaign Is Underway
Support Common Dreams Today
Independent News and Views Putting People Over Profit
Mohamed told Mr Stafford Smith about Informant A
when they first met in Guantanamo four years ago but it is only
recently that new sources have come forward to support his account.
One is Tarek Dergoul, who was held at a US base in Afghanistan in 2002 at the same time as Informant A.
said yesterday: ‘The fact he’d agreed to become a grass was all over
the jail. One of the guards was saying, “We’ve got another 007.”’
is Shaker Aamer, a British-resident Saudi, who was captured with
Informant A. He told Mr Stafford Smith that although he was flown to
Guantanamo, where he is still a prisoner, Informant A was taken
elsewhere by the British.
A third source said Informant A had
been allowed to return to London after his capture, despite his
suspected links to the Taliban and his militant views.
A knew Mohamed in London and helped him plan the fateful journey in the
spring of 2001 that took him first to Pakistan, then to
After Mohamed had fled the
conflict, the mole was wounded fighting alongside Osama Bin Laden in
the caves of Tora Bora. Months after that, Mohamed saw Informant A
again in Pakistan shortly before both men were separately captured.
his release from Guantanamo earlier this year, Mohamed told The Mail on
Sunday he was interrogated by MI5 in Pakistan after being beaten and
hung by his wrists. Later he suffered ‘medieval’ tortures in Morocco.
Americans were convinced he was planning to build a ‘dirty’ radioactive
bomb and detonate it in New York – an allegation that has now been
The British Government is currently fighting a
legal battle to keep secret a summary of CIA documents that describe
On Friday, Foreign Secretary David
Miliband signed a new demand for a gagging order, arguing that
publication of the High Court judges’ summary would cause irreparable
harm to Britain’s relationship with America.