Published on
Associated Press

Study: Some Tasers Deliver Bigger Jolt Than Manufacturer Claims Raising Risk of Cardiac Arrest


A British police officer holds a Taser gun in Kent. A new study shows that some Taser stun guns can deliver a much bigger jolt of electricity than the manufacturer says is possible and could increase the risk of cardiac arrest by as much as half in some people. (AFP/File/Carl de Souza)

A new study shows that some Taser stun guns can deliver a much
bigger jolt of electricity than the manufacturer says is possible and
could increase the risk of cardiac arrest by as much as half in some

The study done by researchers commissioned by the Canadian
Broadcasting Corp. also concluded that even stun guns firing at
expected electrical levels carry some risk of inducing cardiac arrest
in some people.

The study was done by a Montreal biomedical engineer and doctors
working for a U.S. defense contractor and examined 44 Taser stun guns
obtained from seven undisclosed U.S. police agencies.

Taser International Inc., based in Scottsdale, called the study flawed.

"Regardless of whether or not the anomaly (high-firing guns) is
accurate, it has no bearing on safety," Taser Vice President Steve
Tuttle said.

The researchers' analysis contradicts Taser's position that electric
shocks from the weapons cannot kill. The results also raise questions
about quality control in the stun gun's manufacturing and decline in
performance over time.

The study tests found that of the 44 Tasers tested, four would not
fire at all or fired improperly and four others produced from 47
percent more to 58 percent more power than the manufacturer specified.

All four of those that fired beyond their expected capacity were
sold in 2004, making them among the oldest tested. That raised
questions about how the guns age and how they were made in the first
place, said Pierre Savard, a biomedical engineer in Montreal who
co-authored the report with two Chicago doctors.

Taser officials acknowledged the possibility of a higher-than-normal
initial charge in weapons not first given a "spark test" to ensure they
are in proper working condition. They insist this does not affect
safety and cautioned Canadian Broadcasting in a memo not to use
"engineering minutiae to confuse the (public) and create a false sense
of controversy."

Magne Nerheim, another Taser vice president, challenged the study on
significant areas. He said researchers failed to spark-test the gun
before testing the power, which created exaggerated results "not
representative of actual output."

He also said the guns were tested using an incorrect resistance
level that does not reflect the effect of Taser shocks on a human.

In an interview with The Arizona Republic, Savard said previous
studies may have understated the risk Tasers pose because there is
little available research on the effects of the weapon on humans,
especially those who have heart disease.

Although Savard said he recognizes the value of less-lethal weapons,
he added that he is convinced Tasers can kill in some circumstances.

"Scientists who had evaluated the Taser to start with said, 'Well,
there's zero probability of death.' I'm sure that's not the case,"
Savard told The Republic.

The doctors and engineers hired by the CBC to interpret the results
determined the higher electrical current was enough to raise the risk
of an irregular heartbeat to as much as 50 percent for those with
existing heart troubles.

"I'm 100 percent certain that cardiac diseases increase the risk of
death after receiving Taser shock. I think there's enough scientific
evidence for that."

It's still unknown if illegal drugs also change the risk factor, Savard added.

The guns are used by more than 12,000 police agencies across the
country, including many in Arizona. Many authorities credit the weapon
with preventing deaths and injuries to officers and suspects.

But there have been more than 380 deaths following police Taser
strikes in the United States and 26 in Canada since 2001. Medical
examiners have ruled that a Taser was a cause, contributing factor or
could not be ruled out in more than 30 of those deaths.

Taser has challenged those findings and maintains the stun gun is safe.

The findings that the stun guns can produce higher-than-design shock levels contradict repeated Taser statements.

Taser executives have said for years that the guns could not produce
shocks greater than the manufacturer's specifications and that the stun
gun would melt before producing high-level shocks.

"The device is calibrated such that it cannot output any more power.
It's running at 100 percent," Taser Chief Executive Officer Tom Smith
testified in May during a British Columbia government inquiry into
Taser safety.

The inquiry was spurred by the 2007 death of a Polish citizen at
Vancouver International Airport. The man stopped breathing within
moments of being shocked twice by police.

This is the world we live in. This is the world we cover.

Because of people like you, another world is possible. There are many battles to be won, but we will battle them together—all of us. Common Dreams is not your normal news site. We don't survive on clicks. We don't want advertising dollars. We want the world to be a better place. But we can't do it alone. It doesn't work that way. We need you. If you can help today—because every gift of every size matters—please do. Without Your Support We Simply Don't Exist.

Share This Article

More in: