Published on
Agence France Presse

Could The US Election Be Stolen?

Mira Oberman

US voters lining up to register in January 2008. With John McCain and Barack Obama already swapping accusations of widespread voter fraud, experts warn that a bitter and protracted fight could ensue if the race to the White House is decided by a narrow margin. (AFP/File/Ryan Hanson)

TOLEDO, Ohio -
With John McCain and Barack Obama
already swapping accusations of widespread voter fraud, experts warn
that a bitter and protracted fight could ensue if the race to the White House is decided by a narrow margin.

The legal battle over election rules has already made it all the way to the Supreme Court
as Republicans fight to block potentially false registrations from
being validated and Democrats struggle to prevent voter

Compounding the
problem is the decentralized US electoral system, which hands often
partisan local officials the power to make rules and maintain the voter registration rolls.

"I'm hoping it's not close," said Richard L. Hasen, a professor who specializes in election law at Loyola Law School in Los Angeles.

"I am certain there will be problems on election day."

An estimated nine million new voters have registered for the hotly
contested November 4 election, and the Obama campaign says Democratic
registrations are outpacing Republican ones by four to one.

The McCain campaign contends that an untold number of those
registration forms are false and warns that illegally cast ballots
could alter the results of the election and undermine the public's
faith in democracy.

Republicans have launched a slew of lawsuits aimed at preventing false
ballots from being cast, the most high-profile an attempt to challenge
as many as 200,000 of more than 600,000 new registrations submitted in
the battleground state of Ohio that was blocked by a Supreme Court ruling Friday.

They point to investigations into whether liberal-leaning community organization ACORN deliberately submitted false voter registrations as proof of "rampant" and widespread fraud which McCain said could be "destroying the fabric of democracy."

But the Obama campaign said this was just a "smokescreen" to divert
attention from Republican "plotting" to suppress legitimate votes and
to "sow confusion and harass voters and complicate the process for
millions of Americans."

Voters whose registrations have been challenged or those who find their
names have been removed from the rolls are often required to cast provisional ballots, which are not immediately counted in some jurisdictions and are often rejected due to technicalities.

Meanwhile, a 2007 study by the New York University School of Law
concluded that "it is more likely that an individual will be struck by
lightning than that he will impersonate another voter at the polls."

"For these problems to be really decisive they have to be within the
margin of litigation, which is typically a few thousand votes," Hasen
said in a recent interview.


At Stake?

An existential threat to our democracy. A global pandemic. An unprecedented economic crisis. Our journalism has never been more needed.

Can you pitch in today and help us make our Fall Campaign goal of $80,000 by November 2nd?

Please select a donation method:

The 2000 election took weeks to resolve as Democrat Al Gore fought Republican George W. Bush all the way to the Supreme Court after Bush won the state of Florida, and thus the election, with a margin of a few hundred votes.

Four years later, Democrat John Kerry conceded defeat despite allegations of widespread voter suppression in Ohio, which handed Bush his second term with a margin of nearly 119,000 votes.

In the meantime, electoral litigation has become part of the standard play book.

The number of lawsuits filed over elections has more than doubled from
an average of 94 in the four years prior to the 2000 election to an
average of 230 in the six years following, Hasen found in a study
published in the Stanford Law Review.

Misinformation has also been used to discourage voters from showing up on election day.

Students in Virginia, Colorado and South Carolina
were wrongfully told by voting officials that they could lose their
scholarships and their parents would no longer be able to claim them on
their income taxes if they registered to vote in their college towns.

The Michigan Department of Civil Rights
launched an advertising campaign this week to combat misleading rumors
- some started by local officials in mailings to voters - that people
would be denied the right to vote if they lost their home to
foreclosure, have a criminal record or do not have photo identification.

Such tactics are not new, said Laughlin McDonald, the director of the American Civil Liberties Union's voting rights project.

Despite strict constitutional and legal protections for the
right to vote, "the history of the country has been one of flagrant
vote denial," McDonald told AFP.

Many of tactics once used to keep blacks from voting in the south - poll taxes, literacy tests, violence and intimidation - have been eliminated.

But some have been adapted, including the practice of purging
voting rolls of people likely to vote for the other party by
challenging them en masse.

"There's more (attempts at voter suppression) that's been going on in the lead-up to this election than any I can remember," McDonald told AFP.

"The fact remains the people who have the power to make the
rules are all too often willing to do so in ways that serve their
partisan interests."

This is the world we live in. This is the world we cover.

Because of people like you, another world is possible. There are many battles to be won, but we will battle them together—all of us. Common Dreams is not your normal news site. We don't survive on clicks. We don't want advertising dollars. We want the world to be a better place. But we can't do it alone. It doesn't work that way. We need you. If you can help today—because every gift of every size matters—please do. Without Your Support We Simply Don't Exist.

Please select a donation method:

Share This Article